Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5234 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys,

I took up this crazy game about 2 years ago. Currently have a EGA handicap of 21.6.

I wanted to get some feedback on my driver swing.  My distance is about 220m (carry + roll) off the tee. if i'm hitting it well, i have a slight fade - if i'm hitting it badly, i have a pronounced slice :)

I noticed that most people at setup have their arms hang down and then their club shaft at an angle to the arms. My arms and club shaft form a straight line at setup. You'll hopefully see what i mean when you watch the video.

It could be because i havent had any formal golf instruction - the reason i started doing it that way was because i figured the longer the shaft, the better the velocity of the clubhead (assuming angular momentum is conserved), but i could be way off base.

Any comments on the swing overall, as well as the specific question above , are welcome.

cheers

Ujjwal


Posted

Hi Ujwall,

I see a couple of things that could be indicators of swing faults.

Ujwall.bmp

1) Your club face near the top of your back swing looks closed. It's difficult to say what grip manipulations (if any) are occurring from this position. A closed face at the top usually results in the same at impact. A closed face at impact results in either a pull or hook. Since your typical ball flight is a slight fade or slice, you might be blocking your shot by not fully releasing your hands thru impact. I'd first work on squaring up your club face at the various positions of the golf swing. See this article ---> LINK You may want to purchase a swing aid like this ---> LINK

2) It also seems like you over swing at the top. I'd shorten your back swing to the point where your club shaft does not travel beyond parallel with the target line.


Posted

For me, you have a bunch of good things happening in your swing.

Your shaft-arm setup is in the spirit of we single plane swing guys. Check out the site below to find out more about why your instinct to reach for the ball is a good one. You've stumbled into (IMHO) the best way to get that long shaft you are looking for. A conventional swing requires that you clear the hips or make room in some other way to make room for the shaft and arm to make a line. You'll see what your setup can produce in a swing. Dive in and join those of us who swing like Moe Norman.

To see Moe visit:

To learn more about the swing visit:

http://moenormangolf.com/

My few quick tips if you choose not to visit the site that shows Moe -- and things to look for when you do:

Shorten up backswing to allow club no further than parallel to the ground. Longer backswing does not create more speed and makes solid contact harder.

And although it is hard to see in the video, I'm guessing there is something happening in your grip that has the clubface pointing to the sky on the backswing and then somehow re-directed to get more or less square at impact. Fix your grip and you'll find it easier to get the club in position for success. A proper grip allows the hands to produce speed and consistency.

The right grip and a shorter backswing and you'll be killing the ball.

You are also just a bit over the plane line which could also be a compensation for your grip.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Posted

Thanks , rustyredcab and mps67 for your comments.

mps, I hadnt noticed the closed clubface at the top - i think it maybe because i take a very strong grip, because my release is not that great. I'll work on that at the range.

Also, I sometimes shorten the backswing , especially when i'm looking for accuracy - maybe i should make that the standard.

rusty, i checked out the moenorman site - i hadnt actually heard of moe before, but the videos look interesting and in line with my understanding of the physics - i'll do some more digging and try and adopt the techniques.

thanks for the help, guys.

cheers

Ujjwal


Posted

Ujjwal,

Dive head-first into swinging like Moe. I had an 18.0 index and it was going nowhere but slowly up in 2001 before I converted to Single Plane. In 2005 (as a 13.0 index) I discovered the Graves Golf Academy and the true Moe Norman swing. My current index is a personal low of 6.1 (likely to bounce up to 6.4 at the next revision).

You are already embracing one of the main differences -- standing farther from the ball and setting up on your impact plane.

Good luck.

Russ - Student of the Moe Norman swing as taught by the pros at - http://moenormangolf.com

Titleist 910 D3 8.5* w/ Project X shaft/ Titleist 910F 15* w/ Project X shaft

Cobra Baffler 20* & 23* hybrids with Accra hybrid shafts

Mizuno MP-53 irons 5Iron-PW AeroTech i95 shafts stiff and soft stepped once/Mizuno MP T-11 50.6/56.10/MP T10 60*

Seemore PCB putter with SuperStroke 3.0

Srixon 2012 Z-Star yellow balls/ Iomic Sticky 2.3, X-Evolution grips/Titleist Lightweight Cart Bag---

extra/alternate clubs: Mizunos JPX-800 Pro 5-GW with Project X 5.0 soft-stepped shafts


Note: This thread is 5234 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.