Jump to content
IGNORED

Ball Moves On Putting Surface - Do You Call It?


LovinItAll
Note: This thread is 4317 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by zeg

Don't tell me we're going to have to add general relativistic corrections to the RoG!

No we do not have to as they have already taken that into account:

18/3

Ball in Fork of Tree Moves in Relation to Ground But Not in Relation to Fork

Q.A ball rests in the fork of a branch of a tree. The player climbs the tree to play his next stroke. The branch bends under his weight. Although the ball has moved relative to the ground, it has not moved relative to the fork. Is the ball deemed to have moved?

A.The ball is deemed not to have moved since it did not move in relation to the fork of the tree in which it was lodged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by luu5

No we do not have to as they have already taken that into account:

Yes, but what if the ball remains stationary but the spacetime between the ball and the cup curves due to the presence of a large mass (say, from a very dense golfer walking by)? Presumably you must then replace your ball, but I am confused as to how to choose a point of reference for this, since all inertial reference frames are equivalent.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by zeg

Yes, but what if the ball remains stationary but the spacetime between the ball and the cup curves due to the presence of a large mass (say, from a very dense golfer walking by)? Presumably you must then replace your ball, but I am confused as to how to choose a point of reference for this, since all inertial reference frames are equivalent.

Now that Higgs boson has been found, I guess R&A; and USGA can implement all this into next revision of rules. Or if needed in meantime, release some Decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So if my ball is in the sand, do I give myself the penalty for grounding my club because from quantum mechanics the position of my club is not fixed but extends in a probability density function throughout everywhere,  my wedge was "grounded" to the sand even when it was in the trunk of my car.

Or are you recommending that I disregard the Rules of Physics?  Mulligan city?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4317 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...