Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Should each tour have it's own set of rules?


Note: This thread is 5032 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

I was reading a Golfweek article written by John Maginnes.  He talks about how the PGA Tour, European Tour, etc...should each have their own set of rules. With all of the recent talk of belly putters and anchoring going on, he states that:

Quote:
If there was ever a time for the professional organizations to step in the time is now.

He explains that there are quite a few players using one of these types of putters and as much as 50% of the Champions Tour players use them.  Placing a ban on these styles are effectively going to make some players chances of making a living be much harder.

Quote:

The PGA Tour (and the other organizations) has shown reluctance to step in and adopt its own set of rules but it could and it should. It would give the professional game the ability to govern far more than the length of a guy’s putter. It then could easily handle some of the other aspects of the game that have been ignored by the USGA and its counterpart.

The tour, with its own set of rules, could mandate that the ball be dialed back a few percentage points so that players only hit it 340 instead of 355. This is just one example that would be good for the game. Long players would still be long but maybe we wouldn’t have to rebuild every great golf course in the world to make it a challenge for the best players in the world.

He goes on to say talk a little about amateurs and Pros playing by the same rules

Quote:

The possibilities here are endless. There is no other sport that even attempts to have the same set of rules for professionals as it does for amateurs. Furthermore there is no other sport where the governing body for the professionals is an amateur organization. I have the utmost respect for the USGA and the R&A.; What I don’t understand is how it would cause any problem for the professional game to govern the professional game.

I have heard all the tired, old arguments before about how golf is the only game with one set of rules for all. What I don’t understand is the thinking that it is a good thing. You don’t play like Bubba, Ernie, Webb or Tiger. Their organization should make their rules. The rest of us, those who play for the love of the game, will continue to ignore the rules on Saturday mornings like always.

So what do you guys think?  Good idea? Bad idea?  Would this just make everything more complicated than it already is or would this solve issues that seem to have no resolution at the moment?

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I really like John Maginnes (Maginnes on Tap is great)... But I'm sorry.  He is wrong here IMO.  I like that the R&A; and USGA work together to put together a universal language that we all understand and follow which is the 'Rules of Golf'.  I believe the tours should continue to use the rules published by these two bodies as the doctrine and follow them accordingly.

While I agree they should incorporate a rule change for the long putter (belly)... If it doesn't go into effect until 2016, then so be it.  It gives everyone plenty of time to adjust accordingly.  And it isn't like the Long putter has started to cause scoring records to be shattered or anything.  Has it?

And I think it is concidental that 3 of the last four majors have been won by long putters.  And that it isn't going to make the conventional putting stroke obsolete.  I'll go as far to say that even if players with long putters win the balance of the majors between the 2012 PGA and the 2015 PGA... Then so be it.  The long putter had its run in golf, just like steroids in baseball.

The steroids comment is a joke by the way.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5032 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I would think of it in terms of time. The time it takes to get the arm angle into a good position to deliver the club with proper shaft lean. Another component is rotation, but that is also a matter of timing. It relates to how the body stalls to give the golfer time to hit the ball. If you have to get 80+ degrees out of that right elbow in one third of a second versus 50 degrees in the same time then you have to steal time from somewhere. It is usually body rotation. That does not help with shaft lean.  I agree in that amateurs tend to make the swing more complicated than pro golfers. 
    • I haven't been able to practice like I wanted and won't for the next week.  1. The weather sucks in Ohio this year. I have been mostly inside hitting foam balls. Just kind of my basic stuff.  2. I woke up last Saturday with a left side rib muscle on fire. If I turned or leaned a certain way it would spasm that almost buckled my knees. I have been taking a break to let that settle. I don't want to get a long term injury. I think I pinched a nerve or just aggravated a muscles.   3. I am going on a mini-vacation to Florida (screw you Ohio weather) with a friend, and rolling that into a work conference I have next week. I will be with out my clubs for a week.  I will be back next in two Fridays to hit the ground running with some warmer temps and better weather in Ohio, hopefully. I would really like to get more out on the course and the range.     
    • Day 580 - 2026-05-04 Played eight holes. Sometimes golf kicks you in the nuts. 😉 
    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.