Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

"Control of your destiny" in FedExCup...


Note: This thread is 4837 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I figure this phrase, rather philosophical for the golf world, and frequently heard on the TV,  has something to do with the scoring or points system used to determine the winner of the Cup. But only 5 players can get into this 'destiny' group.   As i understand it, the player with the most points after the 4 events wins the cup.  I guess possible that a player who takes 2nd place 4 times may win the cup and 10 MILLION DOLLARS.  But i don't quite get the 'destiny' angle.  I can say without a doubt that if i won that money my destiny would indeed benefit.  And say, didn't one player walk into the final event so far ahead of all others that he stayed home, did not play East Lake, and took the Cup (money)? Weird.  My choice: Watney. All the others already have large bags of money.


Posted
The "control your destiny" thing is just that any of the top five players in the standings will win the FedExCup if they win the Tour Championship. They instituted that rule after 2008, when Vijay Singh was so far ahead he just had to get around East Lake without having a heart attack (he did play though).

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by joekelly

I figure this phrase, rather philosophical for the golf world, and frequently heard on the TV,  has something to do with the scoring or points system used to determine the winner of the Cup. But only 5 players can get into this 'destiny' group.   As i understand it, the player with the most points after the 4 events wins the cup.  I guess possible that a player who takes 2nd place 4 times may win the cup and 10 MILLION DOLLARS.  But i don't quite get the 'destiny' angle.  I can say without a doubt that if i won that money my destiny would indeed benefit.  And say, didn't one player walk into the final event so far ahead of all others that he stayed home, did not play East Lake, and took the Cup (money)? Weird.  My choice: Watney. All the others already have large bags of money.

When Vijay won it he had such a big lead that he probably could have skipped the Tour Championship, but he didn't.  But the rules are far different now.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
When Vijay won it he had such a big lead that he probably could have skipped the Tour Championship, but he didn't.  But the rules are far different now.

Didn't they fix the skipping problem after Tiger skipped The Barclays and still won the FedExCup in 2007?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

For the last several years, they have reset the points just before the Tour Championship so that the guy in first will lose to the guy in 5th if the 5th place guy beat the 1st place guy in a two man playoff.

So in theory, a guy could win every regular season and the first 3 playoff events and still not win the Fed Ex Cup if he lost the Tour Championship in a playoff to someone in the top 5.  If the guy in 6th wins the Tour Championship, he will win the Fed Ex Cup unless the guy in 1st finishes really high up (maybe as high as solo 2nd, but I am not exactly sure).

I am pretty sure that Bill Haas was in something like 27th place going into the Tour Championship while Luke Donald was within the top 5 and missed the playoff by a shot...Result- Haas Champion with Donald 3rd behind Web Simpson (who was #1 going into the TC, but played poorly).

So basically anyone can win if the top 1 or 2 guys play poorly enough at the TC.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter


Note: This thread is 4837 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.