Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Rory McIllroy and New Nike VR_S Covert driver


Note: This thread is 4681 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Will there be an impact on Rory McIlroy's game with the switch to Nike?

    • Yes - He won't win in 2013
      4
    • Yes - He'll lose his No. 1 ranking
      15
    • No - There will be no impact
      27


Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by CanuckAaron

I am not sure that someone as talented as Rory would benefit from trying to optimize his numbers. Understanding his own swing and what he needs to do and feel for a given shot ....

I think you contradict yourself a little here, because I believe that optimizing his numbers is the same as the bold.  Or at least it is one tool leading you to that same end goal.  I can't imagine that more understanding could ever hurt.

Quote:

We'll have to agree to disagree then.  Because these guys can get numbers, know the flight from video - and ingrain that feel/swing pattern into shaping that particular shot.  I'm betting you haven't used Trackman? At least in a formal instructional environment - with a top tier coach who has been trained on Trackman?

No, I think you guys have to agree to agree, he is just wording it differently. :)

Originally Posted by saevel25

Well it depends really. If you learn the feel, sight, sound of the shots you hit, then you combine that with trackman or other fitting tools, you now got data saying, ok that shot shape and impact feels like this, and that is a couple thousand more RPM. With new technology, its possible to relate feel to numbers now.

Yes, but you aren't "feeling" the RPM.  You're working backwards from what you saw happen with the ball to know that it spun a lot more or less.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by k-troop

You can feel a draw, and you can feel that you hit the ball a little too high. But you can't feel the difference between 3000 rpm or spin and 5000.

If the ball goes where you want it to, then does it really matter what the numbers are?


Posted
Originally Posted by CanuckAaron

If the ball goes where you want it to, then does it really matter what the numbers are?

Of course not!  But what about when it doesn't go where you want it to?  Trackman (and the like) can be a valuable tool in helping determine what might be off in your swing.

Furthermore, you can also learn things you didn't know that can help as well.  I recently learned that my driver attack angle is -4 degrees!  More distance has never been a priority for me, but after learning that, I now know that I have more distance in me.  If and when it ever becomes a priority, if I can adjust that attack angle, without changing anything else (except maybe a re-fitting for a driver) I can gain a lot of distance.  [Saw last week that Colt Knost gained 15 yards on his driver just by getting his attack angle from -4 to +0.5]

Without Trackman, it would be hard to know that.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

funny, thats EXACTLY what my divot trench looks like too!!!

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by colin007

funny, thats EXACTLY what my divot trench looks like too!!!


Problem is yours is after three golf balls, and the target is 30° to the right, no? e2_whistling.gif d4_w00t.gif 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Problem is yours is after three golf balls, and the target is 30° to the right, no? e2_whistling.gif d4_w00t.gif 1

Yes! Because everyone knows that divots that go to the right mean you're a good player, right? ;-)

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Rory in 2012:

Rory in 2013:

Must admit that after having received so much money, Rory didn't say anything to really endorse Nike's products.

TaylorMade RBZ 9° | TaylorMade Burner SF 2.0 16.5° | Mizuno MP-33 3-PW | Titleist Vokey SM4 56°11 | Cleveland Classic #4


Posted
Originally Posted by marvin

Must admit that after having received so much money, Rory didn't say anything to really endorse Nike's products.

Other than playing them?

Nike Covert 2.0 10.5* with Fujikura Motore F3 Stiff Flex
Nike Covert 2.0 3 Wood 15* Kuro Kage X-stiff 71g
Nike Covert 2.0 21* 3 hybrid Kuro Kage X-stiff 85g
Nike VR Pro Combo CB 4--PW
Nike VR Pro forged 50, 56, 58
Scotty Cameron Newport 2.5


Note: This thread is 4681 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.