Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4627 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, I am a in my 1st year of golf, have had some success by shooting in the 90's the last few rounds. 90 is best score.

I have been playing with goodwill clubs and discount drivers. My goodwill irons are ok, but until I get consistent with them,no point in getting better ones.  However my driver has been more stable.

Somehow, someway, I figured out I should choke up on it. After I did that, my driving has been pretty consistent.  It is hard to get a true carry/ total on drivers in Tesxas as it ALWAYS windy.  Average day is 10-15mph.  I hit 220-240 ave. into the wind, and 250-270 total with wind at back. Have snuck in a few 302's and 305s' but if I get 280-290, I have thought it was a lucky clean shot. Today I got 9 holes in with virtually no wind. My shortest was 240 and my longest was 280 as measured by the yd. markers.  I play this coarse a lot and they all looked close to where they normally are. Didnt see a 20 yd. forward tee marker.Normally I get one or 2 270's in if I have the wind behind me. Was hitting it really well today.

My question I guess is would a newer driver help ? I hit my buddies Covert the other day and it was a pizz missle ! I told myself I must have one . Just dont know if it would really help. He had it set to 9.5* and I really liked the trajectory. I am hitting an old hand me down 10* Hippo driver. The ball goes a mile high and am just wondering if a) I need a lower trajectory and B) would the newer tech help any ?


Posted

A properly fitted new driver will, no doubt, do you somewhere between some and a lot of good.  Your comment about your irons, however, should apply to the driver as well, IMO.  Sounds like you're hitting the driver you have pretty darn well and that it isn't likely the main thing holding you back from better scores.  Save your bucks and figure out where you need to focus your purchases to improve your scores.  If you're working with a teaching pro that person should be able to help advise on this.

When you are ready to buy the Big Dog, get a professional fitting.  The shaft on modern drivers counts more than the head it seems, and both the shaft and head loft very directly effect trajectory.  But waiting until your swing is grooved a bit more could save you money and frustration.

Driver: Titleist 913 D2 10.5*, Aldila RIP Phenom 50

Fairway 1: Titleist 913F, 17*, Titleist Bassara W55

Fairway 2: Titleist 913F, 21*, Titleist Bassara W55

Irons: Titleist AP1 714 5-PW, Aerotech Steelfiber i95

Wedges: SCOR 4161 48/52/56/60, Genius 9

Grips: GolfPride New Decade Red Mid-size on all of the above.

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Super Stroke Slim 3.0


Posted

Was thinking my money would probably be better served on lessons since my long irons are horribly inconsistent. But a new driver sounds more fun ! Plus it would help take the long irons out of my hands more often. Usually from 140 in I am decent. From 150- 250 out I am sunk.(although 150-160ish is not super bad) .

Am happy with my driver swing as it gets good results so that is why I wouldnt feel so bad upping my driver. Would be useless to drop cash on irons right now. Am thinking about going to golfsmith and get clubhead speed tested and maybe even fitted.  Are they a reliable clubfitter ? Or are they hacks just trying to sell high dollar items ?


Posted

When I was in your position I set a goal for myself before buying new sticks. I said at 85 I'd get a driver at 80 Id get a putter and then when consistently under 80 I went for new irons.

You can adjust your goals in what you feel is realistic for yourself, but my idea was I needed to make sure to get a good swing before good clubs.  The new clubs will help you get more distance and more forgiveness, but won't fix your game.


Posted

If you hit your driver like you say, why buy a new one? Answer because it is fun. That's ok, but not the best advise.

Your long irons are the problem, maybe try a wood or a hybrid instead? I'm not using an I3 and 4 because of the same problem.

The I4 is replaced by a w7, mainly because the w7 is my easiest to hit club (also to get distance out of fairway bunkers). The I3 is replaced by a Hy3.

To tell you the truth: I am in my 4th year of golf and using my 4th driver. Using a Titleist 910 D2 and.... just ordered a Titleist 905T oldie via Ebay

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am familiar with buying clubs simply because I've got the itch for something golf'ish that's new and shiny.  If the kids don't have to eat half-rations next month because of the decision, hey, it's your money!  But lessons and time on the driving range (with the irons you don't hit so well) will probably pay better long-term interest.

My one experience with Golfsmith fittings was disappointing.  I had the distinct impression the guy was primarily interested in making sure I matched something they had immediately in stock.  Maybe he was planning to quit the next week and wanted to make sure he got his spiff for the sale?  That was just one guy, in just one store of a large and successful chain, so other's experiences may well be much better.

Driver: Titleist 913 D2 10.5*, Aldila RIP Phenom 50

Fairway 1: Titleist 913F, 17*, Titleist Bassara W55

Fairway 2: Titleist 913F, 21*, Titleist Bassara W55

Irons: Titleist AP1 714 5-PW, Aerotech Steelfiber i95

Wedges: SCOR 4161 48/52/56/60, Genius 9

Grips: GolfPride New Decade Red Mid-size on all of the above.

Putter: Scotty Cameron Newport 2 - Super Stroke Slim 3.0


Posted

I agree with the goals aspect. Start with a certain club, like a driver, then progress to new clubs as you shoot better. Eventually you will be playing great. Guidance is also always great so lessons wouldn't hurt.


Posted

I've got a fairly fitted bag.  I'd rank the immediate improvement from fitting this way:

1.  Edel Putter

....

...

...

2 (but way behind). Driver

3. Irons

4. Wedges

Just my $0.02.  Go get an Edel fitting.  Its about as much as a new driver ($300-330) and it is incredible the difference a fitted putter makes over an off the shelf one.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I agree johnclay about the putter. I was stuck in the low 100's even though I was hitting 20-30% GIR.  Was 3 putting every dang hole. I shot a back 9 48 once and 3 putted every stinking hole. Was like, I played great and my score still stinks. I got a zebra putter for 20 bucks and practiced for 2 weeks straight. Went out for score and that was when I got my 90. Have since found out that although it has a great feel to it, the sight lines just get me close.  Uncle gave me a hand me down calloway putter. Sight lines are magnificient. I still miss my fair share of putts, but I have the line now.  Missing by 1" short, 1 " long from 8-20 ft. Putting is what got me out of the 100s.  Still some room for improvement though. Some breaks just kick me in the nads.  Think I could learn to read greens a little better.

Yes, 220-160 yds away is what kills me. I still can hit my 4i straight, that is when I dont chunk it. Chunking is my biggest mishit. Have been working with iron swing to get more of a sweeping motion. Have found a little more consistency. Went out last night and hit 8, 6-iron shots. 4 were 165ish straight. 1 had a slight chunk for 140ish.  1 faded 10 yds right. 1 drew 15 yds left , both 160ish. 1 topped for about an 80 yd roll. Was happy that I got most up in the air like that. Will try this swing in my best ball tourney this week.  I dont even go for greens past 180yds.  I did finally put my 3i up and practiced a 3 and 5 wood this weekend. had decent results. Enough so that if I got some room right, I might just try for greens from 220 out.   My goal for new irons is when I get the ball within 15 yds of target from 190 out 90% of the time, I may consider it.


Note: This thread is 4627 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.