Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

All Time Favorite Par 3, 4, and 5.


Note: This thread is 4395 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

What is your all time favorite Par 3 hole, Par 4 hole, and Par 5 hole.

Pictures and descriptions are highly encouraged!

PAR 3

I'm going to be completely cliche but I just love TPC Sawgrass 17th.

Par 4

Turnberry Golf Course, Scotland, 9th hole.

Par 5

I couldn't find a picture but I'm pretty sure it is the 12th hole at Highland National in St. Paul. Where I got my first Par 5 birdie :-D

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138


Posted

Par 3 - TPC Sawgrass

Par 4 - St. Andrews #17 (Road Hole)

Par 5 - Firestone CC #16 South Course

Drivers: Bag 1 - TM R11 (10.5°); Bag 2 - Ping G5 (9°),
Fairway woods: #1 - TM RBZ Tour (14.5°) & TM System 2 Raylor (17°); #2 - TM Burner (15°) & TM V-Steel (18°)
Hybrid: #1 - TM Rocketballz (19°); #2 - Ping G5 (19°)
Irons: #1 - Ping i3+; #2 - Hogan Edge  (both 4-pw, +1" shaft)
Wedges: #1 - Ping i3+ U wedge (52°) & Ping Eye 2+ BeCu (60°); #2 - Ping ISI Sand BeCu (52°) & Cleveland CG11 lob (60°)
Putters: Ping B60i & Anser 2, Odyssey White Steel 2-Ball & White Hot XG #9, Lamkim Jumbp grips
Golf Balls: Titleist Pro V1, Bridgestone B330, Callaway SR1, Slazenger Grips: Lamkin Crossline
Golf Shoes: Footjoy & Adidas; Golf Glove: Footjoy StaSof®; Golf Bag: Ping Hoofer
I love this game! :-D


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Any par 3, 4 or 5 at Spyglass. Pebble 3- at no. 7, 4 at no. 8, 5 at no. 6 (no, not no. 18).  Privileged to play Spyglass twice and Pebble twice.


Posted

Par 3: #16 TPC San Antonio

Yes, that is a bunker in the center of the green.

Par 4: #18 Whistling Straits "Dyeabolical"

Par 5: #18 Pebble Beach

Your desire to change has to be greater than your desire to stay the same.


Posted

I think the 17th at Sawgrass is something of a love it or hate it hole really. Most golf holes have an element of being manufactured, but nature should perhaps be the ultimate architect and this one is probably just a bit too much of a gimmick for me, although no one can deny that it's pure theatre

I can only really comment on the Scottish candidates though. I simply haven't got the familiarity with the US ones outside of the signature holes

Troon's Postage Stamp (the 8th) usually appears on any list, but I'm not so sure myth hasn't exceeded reputation here. The par 3's at Royal Dornoch are all challenging and they're probably the best group collectively. Carnoustie's 16th might be one of the tougher ones (or was). In 1975 Tom Watson played it five times and failed to make par on every attempt, albeit 245yds isn't quite the demand today that it was then. For aesthetics I might go for Kingsbarns 15th, a 212yd shot played over the sea and bringing a little bit of the character of Turnberry's ninth into play in a truncated sort of way. The 15th at North Berwick is another than has been much copied all over the world and become something of a blueprint for the short assignment. St Andrews 11th is another that frequently crops up as a classic par 3 in most discussions I've had (not completely sure I share the enthusiasm for it). I suppose for a bit of quirkiness the 5th at Prestwick is worth a mention as a curio


Note: This thread is 4395 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
    • I think part of it is there hasn't been enough conclusive studies specific to golf regarding block studies. Maybe the full swing, you can't study it because it is too complicated and to some degree it will fall into variable or random.  
    • Going one step stiffer in the golf shaft, of the same make and model will have minor impact on the launch conditions. It can matter, it is a way to dial in some launch conditions if you are a few hundred RPM off or the angle isn't there. Same with moving weights around. A clubhead weights 200-220 grams. You are shifting a fraction of that to move the CG slightly. It can matter, again its more about fine tuning. As for grip size, this is more personal preference. Grip size doesn't have any impact on the swing out of personal preference.  You are going to spend hundreds of dollars for fine tuning. Which if you want, go for it. I am not sure what your level of play is, or what your goals in golf are.  In the end, the golf swing matters more than the equipment. If you want to go to that level of detail, go find a good golf club fitter. ChatGPT is going to surface scan reddit, golfwrx, and other popular websites for the answers. Basically, it is all opinionated gibberish at this point.   
    • Wordle 1,640 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.