Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4133 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've always wondered why most irons sets include a pitching wedge and some include a gap wedge/sand wedge?  I prefer all my wedges to be the same not just for looks sake but also because it makes all the wedges the same just with different lofts/bounces.  I'd imagine that especially for higher handicappers that this would help and be much more consistent?

I've noticed that while many people change their irons, their wedges change less frequently usually because if it is not broken, then why fix it?  This makes sense to me as I've found wedges that I like a lot and have kept in the bag for a while.  So it got me to thinking if I have these wedges that I like, why do I have a PW that matches my irons?  If I like the wedges and add a PW that is the same as my GW, SW, and LW, then this could stay consistent throughout time and would be one less club I need to buy/replace when I get a new set of irons.

So I've added a 46 degree pitching wedge (Cleveland, all my wedges are, they just work for me well).  I'm guessing that it's a marketing thing for iron sets to come with a PW and some with either a GW or SW as the manufacturer does this hopefully so the consumer will purchase the additional wedges from the same manufacturer?

I've seen some wedge sets out there for purchase but not as many as I thought.  It seems there is an opportunity for a manufacturer to come out and sell a complete wedge set that includes a PW and then adds a combination of GW, SW, and LW so all wedges would be uniform?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Some consider a labeled PW at 45 deg as just another iron, and don't use it for any speciality use around the greens.

In that sense, thinking of the 45-46 deg club as just another iron, it makes sense to go with the iron set in that club.

For me, I'd like to go with the iron set all the way to 50, if I could, as the only clubs I generally use around the greens are a 55 and 60.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
This is just personal preference. I think golfers are looking for different things when shopping for new irons versus wedges. They want their irons to be more forgiving, launch higher, go farther, etc. With wedges, you want to get it close. If you are already doing that, why change. I like matching sets. Currently my wedges do not match my set, but the next set will. PS, I need a new foot wedge to match my set.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted

Retailers usually stock Iron sets that come with 8 clubs.  The 'normal' set configuration used to be 3-PW, leaving the buyer to add a gap, SW and a lob wedge to fill out the short end of the set.

Moving forward a bit, the new config seems to be 4-PW plus a GW but not a SW or LW.  Some may even start at 5-iron anymore, but not many that I've seen.

While shopping for my most recent iron set, I only wanted 6-iron through AW, or GW.  I also only wanted to pay for SIX irons rather than EIGHT irons.  No dice at local retailers who erroneously stated they could only ORDER iron sets in 8 clubs.  Not what I wanted.

Searched online retails and was able to find an iron set that included a #4 and 5 hybrid clubs and 6-AW.  Completely happy to purchase EIGHT clubs providing you allow me to configure the set to fit my needs and not buy a set where clubs are going into the scrap bag and not in my playing bag.

After the purchase, I added two additional wedges.  The TM set came with a 45* PW, a 50* AW and I added Titleist Vokey 54 and 58* wedges to complete the short end of the bag.  Golf club manufacturers need to offer the entire line of irons, wedges and hybrids by model and allow a consumer to choose as few or many clubs as they want or need.  Gone are the days of the 3-PW iron sets ... at least I hope!

dave

The ultimate "old man" setup:

Ping G30 driver
Ping G Fairway woods - 5 and 7 woods
Callaway X-Hot #5 hybrid; Old school secret weapon
Ping G #6-9 irons; W and U wedges
Vokey 54 and 58* Wedges
Odyssey Versa Putter
Golf Balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4133 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am fascinated by this article. Given so many are upset, I would love to see how the calculations changed for them. In the USA, it likely reduced handicaps, at least for me. In the UK it appears to inflate handicaps but not uniformly? 
    • Wordle 1,632 3/6* ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟦 ⬛🟦⬛🟦🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.