Jump to content
Note: This thread is 1185 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I recently bought a pair of used Footjoy shoes with softspikes, and while I haven't worn them enough to know for sure, they don't seem to be as comfortable as other shoes I have worn- I can feel a bit of pressure from the spikes.  And walking around with the black widow spikes is a bit odd because it feels like I've got crunchy bits of glass glued to my shoes- I walk with a little bit of a shuffle and I can see how I'd have to be careful or they could be a tripping hazard.   Overall.. I just don't like the spikey feeling as much as a shoe with rubber treads- I think the spikes would only help in damp weather.

My dad was telling me one reason he rarely uses golf shoes is that they always hurt his fee, and that's particularly an issue for him since he has a lot of issues with his feet and legs in general.  He said he got some rubber nubs to replace the soft spikes in his shoes.   I didn't have the opportunity to ask him more about that, but I am curious to find out more, as the Footjoys seem like good shoes but I'd be curious to try them out without the pokey spikes.


I am not saying you can't, but I don't think it would be worth the effort. This is coming from a miserly someone who just spent 30 minutes glueing a sole on a 4 year old pair of  hand-me-down Nike golf shoes that probably cost $60 brand new.

Unless it is a really fancy pair of FJ's, I would probably put the money toward a new pair of True Linkswear or Eccos, or one of the similar shoes from FJ or Nike. If you want to keep the ones you have, there are less agressive spikes than Black Widows.  Some courses don't allow it, but some running or cross trainers probably work just as well as golf shoes unless you are Phil Mickelson. I knew a scratch college golfer back in the day that always played in Clarks's Wallabys.

The reason some courses say no athletic shoes is that folks would show up in baseball, football, or running shoes that are more aggressive and do more damage to greens than golf spikes.

The most important factor for comfort and performance in a golf shoe or any other shoe for that matter is fit. If the shoe doesn't fit, it won't be comfortable regardless of the sole or spikes.  I also have some slight problems walking (knee and heel).

I am a cheapskate, but I won't advise you to get cheap shoes for golf, especially if you walk.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You might try these if your shoes take Champ Spikes:

Champ Zarma Spikes available on Amazon

List Price: $15.00
Price: $9.04 + $1.75 shipping
You Save: $5.96 (40%)
Note: Not eligible for Amazon Prime.
Color: Blue
  • Blue
  • PINS (20 Spikes)
  • Three material design that has an innovative soft cushion layer sandwiched between a durable traction layer and a rigid attachment layer
  • All three layers are held together using advanced polymer molding techniques
  • Lotus technology uses compression to soften the impact of walking
  • Cushion, Comfort & Traction

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 6 years later...

Remove the entire rubber spike mold from the screw with vise grip, micro wire cutter and needle nose pliers.  They rotate off easily if you snip the rubber at each end of the screw holes.  Your flat "specialty" plug with  tighten with  the usual tool.  Most current shoes have sufficient spikeless  tread to keep the exposed metal head from damaging any surface.

20210918_214638.jpg


Note: This thread is 1185 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 8: 12/17/2024 Okay I took my new PPJ swing thought to the range today. I wasn't sure I was quite ready to do so, but I'm glad I did.  When I got it right it was good... really good. When I got it wrong it was a major fail. I hit lots of really ugly ones. But I didn't let that deter me. I stayed committed and focused on the PPJ and I avoided any temptation to go back to what I was doing before just so that I could "look" better at the range. I'm pretty excited about what I saw when I got it right.  I hit the 6 iron mostly (nearly all block work today). I also hit about 6 balls each with the PW, 8I, 5W and Driver. Those had varying degrees of success. I did crack one drive that let me feel and see what the changes will look like once I get fully trained.  Anyway, I'm going to go back to the mirror work for a couple of more days before bringing it back to the range. I do feel like if I can get this right my swing will improve a lot. So I think its worth the effort. I liked the way it looked on GEARs when I get it right, and I like the results I got at the range when I got it right. Now the goal is to work towards getting it right more often. 
    • So I think it's that they can't just bend the shaft or hosel to get it to a new lie angle. They adjust that and it changes the weighting, so they have to then adjust all the weights to get it balanced again. I get the impression that it's a bit of an iterative process and they do it all in the US, so they're paying US labor costs to build it and make it work how it's supposed to. Whether you believe in the tech or not, I think that's a true statement.
    • Ah, the old EE in the backswing move. Chest going back and staying down doesn't help.
    • Extremely outward path with a very closed club face. Maybe unless you have a stupidly weak grip, like right hand way over top, I don't think the grip is necessary highly correlated to this. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...