Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Golf Digest 50 money list: some surprises


Note: This thread is 3955 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

Had no idea Palmer would be so high on this list, higher than Nicklaus. Thought B Watson would have more in endorsements with his 2 green jackets. The other Watson I thought would be much higher on the list based on off course earnings. Stacy Lewis places higher than Wie. Davis Love very marketable - must be dem Polo ads.

Quote:
Just as Tiger Woods is not the dominant player at 39 he was at 24, he's also no longer the runaway No. 1 as a cash machine. While Woods has topped the Golf Digest 50 All-Encompassing Money List all 12 years of its existence, his advantage this year was barely more than $5 million over No. 2 Phil Mickelson and $6 million over Rory McIlroy. Not exactly chump change, but certainly not what it was in the 2010 ranking (the last not impacted by the perfect storm of scandal, injury and swing changes) when his lead was an astronomical $80 million. The other thing of note in this year's ranking is that those chasing Woods are younger and more talented than ever. Of the top 50 players, 18 are 30 or younger, including No. 3 McIlroy, No. 6 Billy Horschel, No. 12 Rickie Fowler, No. 16 Jordan Spieth and No. 19 Martin Kaymer.  While Woods will likely always be a top earner even after his competitive days are gone, it is no longer a sure thing he will always be No. 1.

http://www.golfdigest.com/magazine/2015-03/gd-50-photos?printable=true

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Arnie was a far better businessman than Jack.  Jack nearly went bankrupt a couple of times (and would have been put into bankruptcy if he hadn't been Jack Nicklaus)  due to terrible decisions, being taken advantage of by "friends" and foolishly signing personal guarantees.  Jack spells it all out in his 1996 autobiography.  He would probably have been at the top of that list if he hadn't gotten his nose out of joint and fired Mark McCormick, which would have protected himself from himself.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3955 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.