Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3984 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1-17/25" seems a very strange number to arrive at for a minimum ball size, as it fits poorly into common metric or english units of measurement. I thought perhaps it came about because of some common thinking relevant at that point in history when the decision was made, but it escapes me as to what the thoughts were or metrics used by those who chose to use 1.68" for the minimum diameter of a golf ball. What gives?

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted
Thank you, that corresponds with info I have read along the lines of the larger ball sitting up better. I am sure the shots into the green were improved for those dominating US players. I was interested in reading elsewhere that the 1.62" ball at 1.62 ounces also was utilizing a math relationship called the golden ratio. That sounds very european to me, and could be something they did because it was a natural harmonic asthetically and physically according to some.

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted

I read that info, Mike, thanks.  But the info did not tell us WHY the arbiters of golf,  R&A; and USGA, chose that size of ball only that the 'small ball' was in place first.  Then the USGA wanted to use the 'big ball' and eventually, now, only the big ball remains in use.

From 1920, on to 1988 the size progression was: 1.62", then 1.66" finally 1.68".  I wonder is there some relationship between the ball size and the cup size.  Well, i'll let the engineers work that out.

I read some time ago that the cup size was gotten from an old drainage pipe stuck in the sand at St. Andrew's, which happened to serve well. So that pipe (size) was spread throughout the world.


Posted
It is interesting that you would say that about a pipe, because the inside diameter of some stainless and aluminum pipe I ran across allows for a go-no go sizing for ball size. Being a game, it would not shock me in the least that the right person could have looked around their barn and come up with these numbers, since a century ago there was nowhere near the financial pressure or social involvment with golf that the game enjoys today.

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Note: This thread is 3984 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • It’s possible the graphite shaft has a small internal crack or a delamination. Tapping it and hearing a vibrating sound is usually a sign the shaft isn’t behaving as it should. Since the store wasn’t helpful, consider taking it to a club fitter or a pro shop that can check the shaft flex and integrity. If it’s defective, you might be able to get a replacement from the manufacturer.
    • It’s interesting how much a 3D system changes your understanding. Observing top players in full detail and realizing the trail knee shouldn’t fully extend is a great example of why being open to new info is so important. I like your approach: not trying to be “right,” but trying to teach correctly based on actual evidence. Makes sense why golfers would benefit from this perspective.
    • I would say both are equally not the best for golf. Is it better than nothing, sure.  Golf is an athletic motion. Professional golfers are doing a comprehensive workout routine focusing on strength, power, flexibility, stability. They might include some yoga into the routine. I would put both of them in the recovery bin, not golf enhancement bin.  If you want to increase swing speed, core strength, longevity in golf and life, then lift heavy weights. 
    • Wordle 1,676 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,676 3/6 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.