Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3939 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1-17/25" seems a very strange number to arrive at for a minimum ball size, as it fits poorly into common metric or english units of measurement. I thought perhaps it came about because of some common thinking relevant at that point in history when the decision was made, but it escapes me as to what the thoughts were or metrics used by those who chose to use 1.68" for the minimum diameter of a golf ball. What gives?

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted
Thank you, that corresponds with info I have read along the lines of the larger ball sitting up better. I am sure the shots into the green were improved for those dominating US players. I was interested in reading elsewhere that the 1.62" ball at 1.62 ounces also was utilizing a math relationship called the golden ratio. That sounds very european to me, and could be something they did because it was a natural harmonic asthetically and physically according to some.

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Posted

I read that info, Mike, thanks.  But the info did not tell us WHY the arbiters of golf,  R&A; and USGA, chose that size of ball only that the 'small ball' was in place first.  Then the USGA wanted to use the 'big ball' and eventually, now, only the big ball remains in use.

From 1920, on to 1988 the size progression was: 1.62", then 1.66" finally 1.68".  I wonder is there some relationship between the ball size and the cup size.  Well, i'll let the engineers work that out.

I read some time ago that the cup size was gotten from an old drainage pipe stuck in the sand at St. Andrew's, which happened to serve well. So that pipe (size) was spread throughout the world.


Posted
It is interesting that you would say that about a pipe, because the inside diameter of some stainless and aluminum pipe I ran across allows for a go-no go sizing for ball size. Being a game, it would not shock me in the least that the right person could have looked around their barn and come up with these numbers, since a century ago there was nowhere near the financial pressure or social involvment with golf that the game enjoys today.

Tom R.

TM R1 on a USTv2, TM 3wHL on USTv2, TM Rescue 11 in 17,TM udi #3, Rocketbladez tour kbs reg, Mack Daddy 50.10,54.14,60.14, Cleveland putter


Note: This thread is 3939 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.