Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4064 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Inversions are an important part of the yoga world. Inversions range from mild to more difficult.  All inversions imply that the heart is above the head, unlike normal  where the head is above the heart.  For most adults,  inversions also may tax the respiratory functions as the chest can be compressed or the airways flexed in unusual ways but these become minimized with time and technique.  You will need to learn and employ correct breathing to sustain good inversions.  All of us breathe, but not all of us do so correctly.

I can tell you that standing on your head for some time, let's start with one minute but one hour not rare,  with certainly strengthen your abdomen and back as your body is totally unprepared to keep your heavy legs in that position.  Advise you to seek a yoga instructor for best headstand  technique as the cervical spine can be damaged through improper practice.  Don't get hurt.   Neither the internet, or me, is  responsible for self induced paralysis.

I cannot recommend any inversion table coz, IMO, they lead to a dependency, are costly, bring minimum benefit, take up space in the house, have no resale value, and mostly deprive YOU of the deep satisfaction of accomplishment which a good inversion will bring. However, the table may bring you some relief, and that's good so give it a try.  I've used the foam roller and it can offer benefit.


Posted
Full depth back squats + deadlifts.  Sit ups, cruches, and all other manner of "core" exercises are no comparison to these exercises when it comes to developing core strength and stability.  No contest.  After chronic back pain originating from bulging discs at L4 and L5 suffered from rowing in college in 1986, I did not have a pain free day until 2010.  As a result, in 2006 I sold my club membership and stopped playing golf.  In 2009 I started back squatting and deadlifting, with a linear progression, gradually increasing weight each session.  It was a rough first year, but within 18 month, I was a completely different person.   I started squatting with 95# (the bar plus 25# weights) and added 10# per session with squats. I can play all I want now, no pain whatsoever, to the extent that I just joined another club.  I try to scream this from the roof tops, but either folks don't want to believe me, or are afraid of hard work. If you low bar back squat to full depth, by the way, you get an excellent dynamic hamstring stretch with every rep.  No need for further stretching. If you go past parallel, you also shift the load from the quads to the hamstrings, taking strain off the knee, while developing musculature to protect the knee.  If you stop at or above parallel, you create shearing forces on the knee.  Anyone who tells you to squat at or above parallel is foolish.  Good luck. Just make sure to find someone to coach you on these lifts who knows what the heck he/she is talking about.  The average globo gym trainer is clueless and will try to get you squatting with a ***** pad on a smith machine. Run.

An interesting, and VERY dangerous suggestion for someone with lumbar radiculopathy. I'm curious.....exactly what are your qualifications? MD? PT? Or is this just a...it worked for me so you need to do this???

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Inversions are an important part of the yoga world. Inversions range from mild to more difficult.  All inversions imply that the heart is above the head, unlike normal  where the head is above the heart.  For most adults,  inversions also may tax the respiratory functions as the chest can be compressed or the airways flexed in unusual ways but these become minimized with time and technique.  You will need to learn and employ correct breathing to sustain good inversions.  All of us breathe, but not all of us do so correctly.

I can tell you that standing on your head for some time, let's start with one minute but one hour not rare,  with certainly strengthen your abdomen and back as your body is totally unprepared to keep your heavy legs in that position.  Advise you to seek a yoga instructor for best headstand  technique as the cervical spine can be damaged through improper practice.  Don't get hurt.   Neither the internet, or me, is  responsible for self induced paralysis.

I cannot recommend any inversion table coz, IMO, they lead to a dependency, are costly, bring minimum benefit, take up space in the house, have no resale value, and mostly deprive YOU of the deep satisfaction of accomplishment which a good inversion will bring. However, the table may bring you some relief, and that's good so give it a try.  I've used the foam roller and it can offer benefit.

The inversion table came yesterday, its quite good because you can choose what angle you want to be at, you dont have to be 180 degrees, ive started off doing just around 120 degrees or so just to work my way into a routine. I understand your point however, that a natural handstand with proper technique would be more beneficial than using a machine, but i think i will stick with this for the time being as i imagine getting into the position of a handstand might be quite a challenge and i dont want to make my discs any worse. You mention proper breathing, what is the correct procedure for correct breathing? I have read that with inversion therapy, if you are not completely relaxed then it can be detrimental because having a tense core can cause compression instead of decompression.


Posted

An interesting, and VERY dangerous suggestion for someone with lumbar radiculopathy. I'm curious.....exactly what are your qualifications? MD? PT? Or is this just a...it worked for me so you need to do this???


Fair question.  No "formal qualifications".  And squatting could be dangerous for someone with stenosis.  Yes, it did work for me.  Beyond that, I've studied the topic extensively as I had a great deal of skepticism before undertaking such a regime.

I can throw hundreds of links up, but I like this one a lot:  http://startingstrength.com/index.php/site/article/barbell_training_is_big_medicine#.VTeiXWbtNek

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Fair question.  No "formal qualifications".  And squatting could be dangerous for someone with stenosis.  Yes, it did work for me.  Beyond that, I've studied the topic extensively as I had a great deal of skepticism before undertaking such a regime.  I can throw hundreds of links up, but I like this one a lot:  [URL=http://startingstrength.com/index.php/site/article/barbell_training_is_big_medicine#.VTeiXWbtNek]http://startingstrength.com/index.php/site/article/barbell_training_is_big_medicine#.VTeiXWbtNek[/URL]

Decent read, lots of medical references, and all good information. Only thing is, he (and you) are suggesting barbell training for people with lumbar pain. NONE of his references specifically cite BARBELL training, and they certainly don't support loaded full squats, they cite resistance exercise. Barbell training, specifically putting a bar on your back(across you shoulders or chest) GREATLY increases both compressive and shear forces in your lumbar spine, and is VERY dangerous for someone with lumbar pathology. Now, as a "wise" man told me today, hopefully no one is actually implementing medical/rehab advice that they found on a golf forum. I truly hope that anyone experiencing back pain consults with their MD before starting an exercise program, and then they seek out professional therapy from a licensed Physical Therapist who will help them regain mobility and , most importantly, STABILITY in the area, and only then begin to strengthen. And now I think we may be officially "off topic". :~(

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Decent read, lots of medical references, and all good information. Only thing is, he (and you) are suggesting barbell training for people with lumbar pain. NONE of his references specifically cite BARBELL training, and they certainly don't support loaded full squats, they cite resistance exercise. Barbell training, specifically putting a bar on your back(across you shoulders or chest) GREATLY increases both compressive and shear forces in your lumbar spine, and is VERY dangerous for someone with lumbar pathology.

Now, as a "wise" man told me today, hopefully no one is actually implementing medical/rehab advice that they found on a golf forum. I truly hope that anyone experiencing back pain consults with their MD before starting an exercise program, and then they seek out professional therapy from a licensed Physical Therapist who will help them regain mobility and , most importantly, STABILITY in the area, and only then begin to strengthen.

And now I think we may be officially "off topic".


You are ignoring the author's experience.  He is a MD that would be consulted, presumably, for a back injury.  And he would suggest exactly the program I outline for most patients.   He is a MD doc who has studied and written extensively on the benefits of barbell training and actually trains his own patients (having, himself, thoroughly researched and received detailed training in barbell training).  Many of his patients/training clients are are elderly and infirm.  He recommends barbell training for them and reports uniformly positive results.  The compressive and shear forces you cite are minimized by a program of progressive overload.  As I mentioned above, I said to start very, very light and progress slowly -- doing so helps you regain the mobility and "STABILITY" in the area and strengthens gradually.

And, if you use proper form -- which is easily taught -- there are no shear forces in your lumbar spine.  You stabilize with your lumbar musculature.  As for compressive force, sure, but, again you are bracing with the entire abdomonen, creating strength and stability.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4064 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.