Jump to content
IGNORED

Passive golf swing?


SubPar
Note: This thread is 4515 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I have to chime in on that point, though - those iron swings were like 60%. No way that guy hit that 3I 215-230 yards. I'm 6', 190 lbs, with long arms. I know that I have good swing mechanics, and I know that I've made very tense-free, good swings, and I don't often hit it 300. I realize ball-striking is important and all that, but those swings simply could not send a regulation golf ball those distances. IMHO.

I mentioned to Ron this morning that the yardages on his video may not be the best idea. He said it was not his intention to imply that those were exact yardages he would hit with that exact swing. He said if he were hitting his full distance with the clubs he would "step on it", meaning faster core rotation. I suggested he put up some videos with swings intended to deliver specific results indicated, which he agreed to do.

SubPar
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Hello All:

I'm new to "The Sand Trap" thing and I can tell you that I love the site already! One of my friends is Subpar and he told me about this site and I've read several pages already and I like what I see.

I view my instruction as an open forum and I take my golf education very serious. I also don't think for one second that I have all of the answers and as a matter of fact, the second I think that I'm done learning golf, teaching or living for that fact I should quit all three.

The love that I have for this game is immense and I would love to share it with the world. Now I did see a bit of the "distance" thing and I will certainly change my web-site and remove them as some of you have suggested. I clearly see your point of view and I agree.

I'm also new to the web-site world and of course there's no way to be unflappable and mistakes OBVIOUSLY have been made but what the heck. It's all a learning process.

The one point that I would like to drive home here on this open forum is if anyone that lives in the Southern California area, that would like to experience my methodology, I will be more than happy to put together a full 1 day clinic (FREE OF COURSE balls not included) to help every single one of you, to see how physically easy my system is. Before you think about that just know that all qualified instructors (I hope) have the same goal in mind that I have and that's to improve each and every one of you. The physical aspect of golf is easy ONLY if you approach a new method with an open mind.

Again, my intention to have a web-site is not to prove my method or disprove anyone else’s method. My love for the game makes me want to shout at the top of my lungs and share it with all of you, physically! Mentally, you're on your own!

Just know this, although I am a +3 doesn't mean that I wasn't a 35 hdcp at one point and more than likely I had the exact same issues, faults and headaches you may be going through.

In ending this banter, I welcome any constructive criticism any of you have to offer.

Fairways & Greens.

Regards,
Ron del Barrio
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think taking out the distance claims from your site would be a great idea. The first thing I think when someone tells me huge distances is “who cares”. You would grab my attention if you said “closer to the pin”, or if you really want me to get excited tell me how I will get more consistent.

There is no doubt your swing looks incredibly smooth and effortless, although you would have to sell the head move pretty hard to me. The head thing, to me anyway, says way too much letting go than I am even willing to think about.

I have worked with my current coach for almost two years now. When I started going to him I was playing to a 9. He showed me my swing on video and I almost dropped dead from embarrassment, I couldn’t believe that was my swing. We made some huge swing changes, I made a commitment to stick with them, and my handicap actually went up to around a 15 before things started to come together. Personally I don’t think I could mentally take another round of swing changes, but that’s not to say that it’s not the right program for others, obviously subpar is sold.

If you had to break it down, who would you say your program is best suited for?

Is it the guy that needs more distance (not wants it, there’s a difference)?

Is it for the low handicap player that needs help now that the window of opportunity small?

Finally… the 3 wood from the deck….. it definitely looked like you hit it a little chubby… well??????

Oh and welcome to the Forum

Driver - TaylorMade R9 460 10.5°
3 Wood - TaylotMade Burner Tour
3 & 4 Hybrids - Adams a7
Irons - R7 tp 5-PW
Wedges - Vokey SM Black Nickel - 52º - 56º - 60ºPutter - Scotty Cameron California - SonomaSkyCaddie - SG4Lowest Round - 68 - Par 72 /67.6/120Lowest Tournament Round - 69 -...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 4 weeks later...
...There is no doubt your swing looks incredibly smooth and effortless, although you would have to sell the head move pretty hard to me. The head thing, to me anyway, says way too much letting go than I am even willing to think about.

I have seen

Ron hit balls at the range and been surprised at how effortless it looks and how much power he generates. However, last weekend he decided to take an afternoon off and play a round with myself and two of my friends. I was totally unprepared for the experience of seeing this "passive" thing working on the course. After Ron hit his first drive, which went about 65 yds past all of us, one of my buddies said he thought it was going to be a practice swing because it looked so casual and with a little pause at the top. I kid you not, he took my 6 iron on a 200 yd par 3 and hit the ball 10-12 feet past the stick with the same swing he demonstrates on his website. The ball was so on-line I could barely see it as it was dead behind the flag. He was goofing around, wearing sandals and teeing off barefoot and was -3 through 11 holes (on recently punched greens). It was getting dark on us and he quit at 11 which was next to the parking lot. We didn't get to complete the round but it is safe to say he would have ended up 5 or 6 under. I learned a lot that day becasue I was then able to connect what he teaches to actual on-course technique. He has offered to do a clinic for Sand Trap members in the LA area. It could only help to take a look at this method. I'll press him to start a thread restating the offer. SubPar
Link to comment
Share on other sites


This looks so simple yet I have a hard time taking "the hit" out of my swing. You've heard commentators during tournament coverage mention the importance of tempo or possibly how David Toms putts and swings like there is "no ball there". It is human nature to see the ball as the target and to try to ‘hit’ it, but in those rare moments when I can forget the ball and just let it get in the way during a complete swing I hit it so much better.

You gotta understand, Toms is Brian Manzella's pupil. Brian says Toms had a very bad hook swing, and his current swing is what Brian calls Never Hook Again. It's an anti left swing. If you aren't a powerful ball striker and an underplane hooker, it's probably the wrong model for YOU.

There is no one right way to swing the club, it depends on your faults and tendencies.

Driver- Geek Dot Com This! 12 degree Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 Stiff
Adams Tour Issue 4350 Dual Can Matrix Ozik Xcon 5

Hybrids- Srixon 18 deg
Srixon 21 deg Irons- Tourstage Z101 3-PW w/Nippon NS Pro 950 GH - Stiff Srixon i701 4-PW w/ Nippon NS Pro 950 GH-Stiff MacGregor...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You gotta understand, Toms is Brian Manzella's pupil. Brian says Toms had a very bad hook swing, and his current swing is what Brian calls Never Hook Again. It's an anti left swing. If you aren't a powerful ball striker and an underplane hooker, it's probably the wrong model for YOU.

I guess you are right. Toms' swing which is a model of balance, tempo and consistency is not for everyone.

SubPar
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 6 months later...

Ron,

I am grateful that there are people out there like you. Unfortunately I live in the east coast and am unable to partake of your experience. I do appreciate your website and have tried those techniques. These days my swing has been very bad. From reading all of these websites and tips, my muscle memory is pretty bad. I am going to the driving range at least once a week and am getting more inconsistent. Your method appears similar to the 1 plane swing. Is this correct? I would love to be able to adopt your swing. Hopefully with more practice I can. thank you, Tom
Hello All:

In my weekender golf bag

Driver: Burner 10.5 with stock stiff shaft
Irons: X-20s with stock steel
Hybrid : X with 24 degree loft 4HWedge: X forged 58 degree & 56 degree (older)Putter: 2 ball DFX bladeBalls: whatever I get at low cost
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I tried out his methods this morning. I just picked up golf half a year ago, so making swing changes wasn't too restrictive. I need some more practice with ron's techniques, but compared to my other method of swinging where I would attack the ball, ron's techniques feel a lot more free-flowing, like I'm gliding through the ball. It also felt like I was making better contact with ron's technique.

Distance is relatively the same. Shot dispersion was worse with the ron swing, as occasionally I would shank it, although this is primarily due to not practicing enough with his techniques.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I usually hit better after watching his videos becasue I get a clear image of the tempo and form. You do miss hit a few at first but that is to be expected.

I can actually hit better shots if I use the early head turn, but I am not yet ready to take that to the course. When I let my head turn early I swing "through" the ball rather than "at the ball", which produces a better trajectory and more spin.

SubPar
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bringing your head up early could cause many people to open their shoulders early and come out of the shot. Keeping your head down is a tried and proven way to make your right shoulder go under instead of around. A stubborn flaw that plagues many amateurs including me.

The idea that we don't need weight shift is not new. But I don't see many pros employing it not even Baddeley who is supposed to be a devotee of stack and tilt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bringing your head up early could cause many people to open their shoulders early and come out of the shot. Keeping your head down is a tried and proven way to make your right shoulder go under instead of around.

Wonder why Tiger said he is interested in incorporating this Anika-like head move into his game? Maybe he likes the way it promotes shoulder rotation through impact. Or how it is easy on the back.

The idea that we don't need weight shift is not new. But I don't see many pros employing it not even Baddeley who is supposed to be a devotee of stack and tilt.

S&T; or not, with the possible exception of the driver, you really don't want much weight shift backward on the take-away. But you can argue details all day, there are plently of different ways to deliver power to the ball. Kenny Perry is long off the tee and his head bobs up and down.

SubPar
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Golf instruction has advocated swinging through the ball (as though it wasn't there) for years. All the greats did this in one way or another. It produces acceleration through the shot, which is vital for letting the club do the work and stay on path. As far as the head thing goes, "keep your head down" is a misused term, just like "shift your weight to the right". Keeping the head down promotes low chin positions and poor posture. The weight (just like a pitcher throwing a fast ball) must naturally go to the inside of the rear foot (Nicklaus termed this "playing golf from inside the feet"). Ron's method appears to be taking your focus off hitting the ball and into feeling gravity rule the club (allowing for that all important lag). Even Tiger talks about not rushing the top of the swing and allowing gravity to rule before applying power to the swing (whip, sling, etc). Notice though that Ron does NOT change spine angle prior to impact. He rotate and preserves it, allowing the head to rotate along with the shot. Perfectly fine because the impact position, the moment of truth, is preserved and left unhindered.

It's really too bad I don't live in SoCal or I would take Ron up on his offer.

All you have to do is swing a blade once, through the sweet spot, with a smooth swing, to realize it doesn't take a body builder to make that ball fly like the devil is chasing it.
Favorite Practice Course:
Z Boaz Municipal, Fort Worth <<< Ben Hogan grew up playing here!
--------------------------------------------------

In the bag: 983E 9.5*, Fuji Speeder S RPM LP, 4W, Neutral Bias STAFF Ci6 irons, S (going up for sale soon) Tom Watson PVD 08 Wedges (G.S,L)... and a 4...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


It looks like this thread was kind of revived from the dead, but if there's still talk of a clinic, I'm down for any help I can get!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've looked as Ron's videos very carefully and noticed a few things.

His hips and lower body are not too active when initiating the downswing. It's mostly a timed rotary momentum and acceleration. I can see more hip pull with his longer clubs such as the woods and driver though. But because he doesn't take advantage of his lower body pulling his shoulders through an inside slot, he must rely on good timing and synchronization with the pull of gravity and club to ball impact. If he's off a little, he's going to hit a little fat. Look carefully at the ruffled grass an inch or two before the ball with some of his swing samples. When hitting irons, he suggests placing the ball in the middle of his stance, or even back a touch. This is ensure that he's swinging down into the back of the ball.

I guess that this swing method works well for him. But will it be a problem with bad lies? Can he hit down steeper and with more power in order to compress the ball in bad situations? I seem to feel that this swing isn't going to be as repeatable and versatile.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Bringing your head up early could cause many people to open their shoulders early and come out of the shot. Keeping your head down is a tried and proven way to make your right shoulder go under instead of around. A stubborn flaw that plagues many amateurs including me.

"Keep your head down" is bad advice. Hogan explains it better than me:

Say a golfer picks his head up and mis-hits his shot badly. His partner will usually tell him, "You didn't keep your head down," as if this were the true cause of his poor shot. It isn't. The true cause was some faulty movement in the golfer's swing that made him pull his head up. For example, if the golfer starts down form the top with his shoulder or his hands and not with his hips, he can't possibly hold his head where it should be. If you are swinging correctly, on the other hand, you can't look at anything but the ball.

It's time to start thinking in terms of the cause and not the result for most golfers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


"Keep your head down" is bad advice. Hogan explains it better than me:

Well said. That's like people who say, 'he pushed that putt,' as if that explains the problem. IMO, people push putts, not because of a stroke/setup problem, but because they changed their mind midstroke, because they didn't trust their read.

Nothing in the swing is done at the expense of balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Subpar and Ron,

Thanks for posting both of you. Here is what I suggest. Subpar get a few people together and do the clinic. Videotape it and post it here. Then we can see this swing method in the works with players other than Ron himself. Absolutely meaning no offense to you Ron, but after playing as long as you have, you have certainly developed a hightened ability to strike the ball consistently in the same spot without even looking at it. Many of us high handicappers are still struggling to consistently find the ball (no doubt because we try to hit the ball, shift our weight, keep our head down, yada yada yada... ).

I personally don't doubt the distances. With good balance and center contact, shots fly much farther than people realize for a given club speed, especially with blades.

As for me, I am going to give the methodology a shot at the range in the next few days. I'll report back later.

Favorite Practice Course:
Z Boaz Municipal, Fort Worth <<< Ben Hogan grew up playing here!
--------------------------------------------------

In the bag: 983E 9.5*, Fuji Speeder S RPM LP, 4W, Neutral Bias STAFF Ci6 irons, S (going up for sale soon) Tom Watson PVD 08 Wedges (G.S,L)... and a 4...
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Subpar and Ron,

The main benefit of a clinic would be to see Ron's technique up close and live. As with any swing changes, no one is going to get it the first time out. Ron has computer gear and a camera that can capture some swings for posting... as long as anyone is willing to have their swing out there for the world to see!

I personally don't doubt the distances. With good balance and center contact, shots fly much farther than people realize for a given club speed, especially with blades.

What I see when Ron swings is the same thing I see when I watch Couples, or any top player live... tremendous acceleration through and beyond impact. It is clear this is largely the result of relaxed grip pressure and lack of tension in the arms. This relaxation, combined with very efficient mechanics, allows the club head to be driven by the centrifugal force generated by the core rotation. Easy to say, hard to do. As for the distances, Ron hit my 6 iron some 205 yards, at sea level... one shot right over the flag. Phil can hit his 9 iron 190-200 when he needs to, so why doubt that great swings produce what seem to be impossible results to most of us.

As for me, I am going to give the methodology a shot at the range in the next few days. I'll report back later.

When I employ the early head rotation at the range, I definitely hit shots more on the target line and with better acceleration through impact. My feeling is the head rotation takes my eyes off the ball so I don't hit "at the ball" and also helps me clear my lower body and shoulders through the shot. I still lack the courage to do that on the course. At first you'll hit a few thin shots, or shanks, because the tendency is to lift up at the same time you tilt the head. But just suffer through that till you get the feel of it.

We can do the clinic. All Ron needs is for a few people on this forum to indicate an interest. SubPar
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4515 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...