Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6650 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I don't hijack

DDBowdoin's 'Shank Shank Shank' thread anymore... Let me quote myself from last week...
I have been dealing with this horror as well for about the past 2 months. My October index just broke into single digits (9.2) but I was facing this crisis.

Well, it turned out where I was choking down to had absolutely nothing to do with these hits on the heel (and occassional shank) as

Leek suspected. After work that day I hit some wedges and was back to heel hits That weekend, I found the problem (I believe it's for real this time)... As I started my backswing, my right arm was folding at the elbow almost immediately. It should stay relatively straight going back to about the 8:00 o'clock position to promote a correct shoulder turn and a proper wrist cock. I probably hit about 200 practice wedges during the week focusing on this and, sure enough, I really feel it was the problem. I don't have this problem on full swings because I was taking the club back correctly which is why those shots were on or near the sweet spot (maybe a little thin at times). I took it out on the course this past Saturday, in my monthly Men's Club tourney no less, and hit every partial and full wedge on or near the sweet spot. I just used it as a swing thought. I think it helped with all my short irons. On my first hole I had a 60 yard downhill-downwind approach, in a light drizzle. I used my 7:30 swing (maybe a little longer) to launch a high soft dart directly online about 10 feet beyond the pin. I looked at the clubface and saw I caught it sweet. That gave me the confidence for the rest of the day. I shot my personal best on my home course that day (78) and, as a bonus, took 3rd place net in the Stableford format . If you're hitting them on the heel, check your takeaway. Are you folding that right arm too soon? Did the bad takeaway cause a bad partial shoulder turn causing the heel shot?

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


Posted
May I carry it a little farther? What was happening imho, was you were very inside on the backswing with an open clubface. On the downswing, the hosel was leading the clubhead. If there was an ant on the clubface, he would not have been able to see the ball. This is called lagging the hosel.

The easiest way to cure shanks, is to make sure the "ant" when sitting on the sweetspot can see the ball on the downswing. This is called lagging the sweetspot.

Driver- Geek Dot Com This! 12 degree Matrix Ozik Xcon 6 Stiff
Adams Tour Issue 4350 Dual Can Matrix Ozik Xcon 5

Hybrids- Srixon 18 deg
Srixon 21 deg Irons- Tourstage Z101 3-PW w/Nippon NS Pro 950 GH - Stiff Srixon i701 4-PW w/ Nippon NS Pro 950 GH-Stiff MacGregor...


Posted
There are four situations that can cause a shank.

1. During your swing, your weight shifts toward the the ball causing your body, and your club to move closer to the ball.

Keep your weight centered in the middle of your feet, or more toward your heels if you really have trouble.

2. Your downswing is severly in to out.

3. In your downswing, your arms are drifting away from your body towards the ball.

4. Your clubs are extremely upright.

Some of these problems are tough to see and feel on your own.

I respectfully disagree with Leek on the statement of the clubface angle having anything to do with a shank. The face can be open, square, or closed, but if the hosel is moving towards the ball, you will shank it. The method you use to "lag the sweetspot" may cause the arms to stay connected to the body or keep the path from coming inside-out too much.

Leek- I'm obviously new here, so if there is a thread in which you explain your swing theory and terminology, I'd be interested in reading about it.

Joe McNulty

5SK™ Director of Instruction, Cape Cod, MA

Driver - D3 9.5

3-Wood - SQ 15

Hybrid - 17 Adams

4-PW - 714 AP2

50, 56 & 60 - Vokeys

Putter - Scotty

Ball - Pro V1x


Posted
My weight seemed to stay on the balls of my feet. Moving to the heels didn't help other than to get me out of balance.

I swung the club in indoors, regular speed and slow motion, with a rectangular suitcase along the target line with just enough room for the club to pass. While doing this, I noticed the path was way off (it might have actually been going inside-out...too far out). That made me focus on my mini-turn which brought me to my shoulders and ultimately the right arm folding up early with the elbow pointing straight behind me. Once I corrected that, I never hit the suitcase. I then took it out to the range and started getting better results. It felt strange at first because my arms felt like they were stretching too far for such a little shot. I would not cock the wrists enough or do it too late. After a few dozen shots, it felt better. After a couple hundred it felt right.

The only thing I could see that corrected the issue was the right arm on the backswing which produced the correct arc and path. I made sure I didn't collapse my wrists (which I was doing a little).

It was so weird cause I didn't appear to be pushing the club out away from my body, yet everytime I came into the ball the clubface was square but the heel was closer to the ball (even in slo mo). While this was happening on the course, I would hit a lot of shots online, or with a slight push, but the impact was on the heel. I did mix in a few flat out hosel shanks too. On the range, I would hit more shanks.

Since I made the correction with the right arm, I haven't shanked and the heel shots only occured if I deaccelerated and got out of position or if I bent that right arm too soon.

Driver: R7 SuperQuad TP 9.5° Fujikura Rombax 6X07
Hybrid: Rescue TP 19°

Orlimar3wood: Hip-Steel 15° (oldie but goodie)Irons: Ping i10 [4-GW] DG X-100Wedges: Ping Tour-W [54° & 58°] DG X-100Putter: i-Series Piper HBalls: B330-S or e5+


  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Try taking your normal stance and ball position. Then place a tee an inch or two inside of the ball. Then put your club behind the tee just as you would do to the ball. . It's going to seem funny but to actually focus on looking at the tee, and not the ball. Try to hit the tee, and theres a good chance youll hit the adjacent ball pretty squarely.

illustration:
---
(feet) I O
---


the O represents the ball and the I represents the tee.

Posted
I respectfully disagree with Leek on the statement of the clubface angle having anything to do with a shank. The face can be open, square, or closed, but if the hosel is moving towards the ball, you will shank it. . .

The last sentence is true.

However, I believe what Leek was correct when he said it (shanks) stems from the swing being "very inside on the backswing with an open clubface. On the downswing, the hosel was leading the clubhead." I believe what Leek was trying to articulate is that as you take the club back, the forearms roll (clockwise) opening the clubface. This opening of the clubface combined with a very inside takeaway demands too much from the forearms and hands to square the face @ impact. Thus the hosel leads as the club nears impact. And in my experience inevitably results in a shank. Unfortunately, I too endured the shanks from 3/4 wedge shots to chips. This was exactly my problem. In addition to this I would also swing outside in with the hosel leading too. My chips and pitches were too handsy and I had my setup all wrong. Sometimes what seems like an "inside-square" swing is actually outside-in. It helped me to lay a club down to indicate my target line and get a reference for where the club was on the takeaway. An instructor with a keen eye helps too. There's a great drill by Rick Smith on the golf channel to cure this.
You don't know what pressure is until you've played for five dollars a hole with only two in your pocket - Lee Trevino

MP-600 @ 10.5°
Insight BUL 3-wood @ 15°
Insight BUL 5-wood @ 18° IDEA a2 4i Hybrid @ 23° MX-25 5-PW MP-R Series 52° > 50°/05° MP-R Series 54°/10° MP-R...

Note: This thread is 6650 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.