Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3803 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I played merion east yesterday.  I must say I was pretty underwhelmed.  I mean don't get me wrong, I had a lot of fun and it's a nice course, but it didn't feel super special.  There are certainly prettier courses in the area in my opinion, and more interesting layouts.  To me it felt like just another round of golf.

Have other people had a similar experience playing very famous courses?


  • Moderator
Posted

I've now played five courses that have hosted majors.  Pinehurst #2 isn't visually too exciting, but the design makes it a very interesting and demanding play.  I've played it both before and after the renovation, and I really enjoy the new look.  Congressional is a lovely course through mature trees, just good and hard.  Whistling Straits is stunning, and probably not as hard as it looks.  Of course, it looks impossible.  I played Carnoustie in steady rain, which I understand is pretty typical, and found it to be very hard, but not very scenic.  Its largely pretty level, with no real views anywhere.  The Old Course isn't stunning either, but I absolutely loved playing it.  Its pretty level overall too, but with so many humps and hollows, and the town as a backdrop for the holes coming in, its just amazing.  So I guess for my experience its 2 that are amazing of the five I've played.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I can't say that I have had that experience of being disappointed by "famous" courses. For example, many will say that Torrey Pines is one of the lamer courses to recently host a major… and yet, it gets a fair amount of local play, produced a pretty great championship, and the views are apparently scenic and nice.

I played Oakland Hills and while I could see and enjoy and appreciate what makes it a major championship venue, I didn't worry too much about that - it's still just a golf course, and I'm still just a golfer.

I almost appreciate the courses the women play more for their majors because their major setups are more like regular play than the men's majors. For example, Oakmont is set up VERY differently for men versus the women. We've played a course in our section in Rochester that hosted an LPGA major for a number of years (Locust Hill), and the men were just at Oak Hill. I've played Kiawah Island, too, and a few others I'm probably forgetting (oh yeah, Tanglewood had a PGA Championship that Trevino won and then a Champions Tour event for awhile).

But no, I've never had the experience of being let down by a course. I think, though, it depends on your state of mind and expectations. I played the Old Course, for example, while they were getting ready for the Dunhill tournament, so there were a few stands set up too… but many people expect to play the Old Course and instantly be overwhelmed by nostalgia and whatnot… but that's just not going to happen. I think that people who go into a round at a "famous" course looking for that overlook their own new memories of the day, and as a result, don't form very many. One of my strongest memories from the Old Course, for example, was on the 11th hole. I played a creative shot and pulled it off and the stern, dour, unimpressable caddies all stopped to tell me what a great shot it was. That stands out as my OWN memory.

Like I said, I think a lot of people almost expect feelings or something to wash over them. Stripped of the grandstands, the crowds, etc. the golf courses don't have the same feel as when they're hosting a major. But they're still the same course, basically, so just play and focus on your round. Try some famous shots here and there (like Payne's on 18 at Pinehurst for example), but just mostly play your round and remember all that you can from YOUR round.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The only thing I really find disappointing in playing some of these courses, is the price. For instance... Torrey Pines, Wolf Creek, Caledonia Golf & Fish. I really enjoyed playing all of them, but there are enough courses I have also really enjoyed that don't cost $200 per round. Durand Eastman (Rochester) is $30 with a cart, Shadow Pines (Rochester) is $50 with a cart, Mtn Dell (Salt Lake) is $45 with a cart. They're not Oak Hill, CCR, Torrey, Wolf Creek, etc., but I still find just as much enjoyment, at 25% of the cost. I appreciate the differences in different courses, famous or not. At the end of the day, it's all golf and I enjoy it.

Posted
I almost appreciate the courses the women play more for their majors because their major setups are more like regular play than the men's majors. For example, Oakmont is set up VERY differently for men versus the women.

I have to agree. I caddied in the 1992 Ladies Open at Oakmont, and the greens were significantly slower than they were for the men's open in 1994, when I forecaddied hole #18. In addition the rough was much lower than it was for the men's, as well. The greens were pretty fast for the ladies in 2010, but still nothing like the men in 2007. In addition, if the USGA would never consider growing the ladies' rough as long as the men's rough, for obvious reasons.

Having caddied for quite a few golfers who were playing Oakmont for the first time, I can tell you that they are duly impressed with how difficult an open course can be. I was caddying with a group of golf course raters from Golf Digest and the head rater told the caddies, "I can only give one course a 10 rating, and this might be the one."

Here are a few quotes about Oakmont...

Lee Trevino: “There's only one course in the country where you could step out right now — right now — and play the U.S. Open, and that's Oakmont."

Johnny Miller said that Oakmont's are the greatest set of greens for testing a player's ability to putt.

USGA Sr. Director of Rules and Competitions Mike Davis: "There's a reason [the U.S. Open is] coming back to Oakmont. This really is the gold standard for championship golf. It doesn't get any better than Oakmont."

I will say that the weather this spring and summer has been very wet, and the course has been a little on the tame side. However, with the Open coming next June, I'm sure that John Zimmers, the greens superintendent, is being careful to have the course in optimum condition.

Drivers: Bag 1 - TM R11 (10.5°); Bag 2 - Ping G5 (9°),
Fairway woods: #1 - TM RBZ Tour (14.5°) & TM System 2 Raylor (17°); #2 - TM Burner (15°) & TM V-Steel (18°)
Hybrid: #1 - TM Rocketballz (19°); #2 - Ping G5 (19°)
Irons: #1 - Ping i3+; #2 - Hogan Edge  (both 4-pw, +1" shaft)
Wedges: #1 - Ping i3+ U wedge (52°) & Ping Eye 2+ BeCu (60°); #2 - Ping ISI Sand BeCu (52°) & Cleveland CG11 lob (60°)
Putters: Ping B60i & Anser 2, Odyssey White Steel 2-Ball & White Hot XG #9, Lamkim Jumbp grips
Golf Balls: Titleist Pro V1, Bridgestone B330, Callaway SR1, Slazenger Grips: Lamkin Crossline
Golf Shoes: Footjoy & Adidas; Golf Glove: Footjoy StaSof®; Golf Bag: Ping Hoofer
I love this game! :-D


Note: This thread is 3803 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.