Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3789 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I've been deciding between the Mizuno MP 67 and the WilsonStaff FG62 clubs, both used, or a set of new blades/muscle backs. I hit almost all clubs I try extremely well and I'm trying to buy clubs better for shaping shots. I can include distances and other info if you'd like. What are the pros/cons of new vs used.

Posted

A couple of questions: If you almost always hit the ball well, why do you have an 18 HDCP?

I'm not being snarky - but, if you jump to blades with your HDCP, you might see your scores go up, not down.

As for shot-shaping, you can hit a basic draw or fade with most any club if you understand set-up for the golf swing. To go beyond that will require a lot of practice.  And, competition golfers normally use their stock shot shape for about 90% of their shots.  This stat has come up in other threads on TST. So, what will blades bring to your game?

As far as new vs. used:

  • New: You can get custom fit, and have more variety on shafts. Drawback: Much higher cost.
  • Used: If you know the recipe for the used club (variations in lie and shaft length), and it fits what you need, you get a lower cost for the purchase. Drawback: if it's not quite your fit, you can spend several weeks trying to get them tweaked, and end not really being able to hit them.

For a cosmic discussion on blades, etc., check out this composite thread:

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I like the MP-52s I bought lightly used 3 or 4 years ago. The shop I bought them at bent them 4 degrees up, so it was almost like getting a custom set (which can be an advantage of new). New sets also have the advantage of being unused and some may have a better warranty than used sets. The biggest advantage to used is the lower price and the fact that you might be able to turn around and sell them for close to what you paid if you don't like them.

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter


Posted
A couple of questions: If you almost always hit the ball well, why do you have an 18 HDCP? I'm not being snarky - but, if you jump to blades with your HDCP, you might see your scores go up, not down. As for shot-shaping, you can hit a basic draw or fade with most any club if you understand set-up for the golf swing. To go beyond that will require a lot of practice.  And, competition golfers normally use their stock shot shape for about 90% of their shots.  This stat has come up in other threads on TST. So, what will blades bring to your game? As far as new vs. used: [LIST] [*] New: You can get custom fit, and have more variety on shafts. Drawback: Much higher cost. [*] Used: If you know the recipe for the used club (variations in lie and shaft length), and it fits what you need, you get a lower cost for the purchase. Drawback: if it's not quite your fit, you can spend several weeks trying to get them tweaked, and end not really being able to hit them. [/LIST] For a cosmic discussion on blades, etc., check out this composite thread: [CONTENTEMBED=/t/1358/master-forged-vs-cast-or-blade-vs-game-improvement-iron-thread layout=block] [/CONTENTEMBED]

my handicap is: errant drives terrible putting I struggle with approach shots closer than 80 yards I have been working with an instructor 3 months working on shot shaping and he's been letting me borrow his blades to do so.


Posted
my handicap is: errant drives terrible putting I struggle with approach shots closer than 80 yards

I'd go for used and spend the money you save on lessons, getting fitted for a putter (and possibly driver and wedges).

:mizuno: MP-52 5-PW, :cobra: King Snake 4 i 
:tmade: R11 Driver, 3 W & 5 W, :vokey: 52, 56 & 60 wedges
:seemore: putter


Posted
my handicap is: errant drives terrible putting I struggle with approach shots closer than 80 yards I have been working with an instructor 3 months working on shot shaping and he's been letting me borrow his blades to do so.

not to mention, smaller club faces always help me with my impact


Note: This thread is 3789 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.