Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3765 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
My brother and I bought a set of Ping G25 from American Golf plus extras coming to £1000. Before we bought them we had a guy take us to the range to try them out. His method of custom fitting analysis was to put tape on the head and check where the bottom was hitting the ground, likewise where the ball was hitting the face. It came up pretty level and accurate. So he convinced us both that custom fitting wasnt necessary. I am 6'2 and my brother is 5'8 and I know I have very long limbs. Now, with my 20+ years experience in Ice Hockey I fully understand the science between hand position and the lie of the blade/head. Anyone is able to place their hands on a club in a position to make the club head flush to the floor. This is obviously what my brother and I did when first using these clubs and therefore hit the balls nicely. My question is, is this guy from American Golf talking nonsense and trying to convince us that these clubs are either one size fits all or we are a very rare case of picking up a set of professional clubs and they coincidently fit perfectly? I did return six weeks later to ask him about is theory as to why we shouldn't have them fitted and he just fobbed me off saying about the tape test and that the lie is fine.

Posted

Depends on your swings. If you were swinging with your normal swings then what he did was about right. If you "adjusted" your swing yourself to take account of the lie then he didn't. Theoretically your dynamic swing should be more accurate as there will be a tendency for you to create your own dynamic swing plane during the swing. But if you are just starting out then your swing may be too changeable to give an accurate lie.

The problem with big box companies like AG is some stores have good fitters and some don't - its a bit pot luck, and difficult for us high handicappers to identify.


Callaway Big Bertha V Series 10.5 Driver stiff shaft
Benross Hot Speed 16 deg 3 fw
Callaway XR 22 deg hybrid
Callaway XR 25 deg hybrid
Callaway Big Bertha 6-pw
Callaway Mack Daddy 3 48/54/60 wedges
Odyssey White Hot Pro Havok


Posted
That is a pretty standard lie angle test, sounds like your lie angles should be pretty good. Though he should have done the same test on your old clubs and compared the specs to make sure. Swing speed measurement should have been done as well.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My brother and I bought a set of Ping G25 from American Golf plus extras coming to £1000.

Before we bought them we had a guy take us to the range to try them out. His method of custom fitting analysis was to put tape on the head and check where the bottom was hitting the ground, likewise where the ball was hitting the face. It came up pretty level and accurate. So he convinced us both that custom fitting wasnt necessary.

I am 6'2 and my brother is 5'8 and I know I have very long limbs. Now, with my 20+ years experience in Ice Hockey I fully understand the science between hand position and the lie of the blade/head. Anyone is able to place their hands on a club in a position to make the club head flush to the floor. This is obviously what my brother and I did when first using these clubs and therefore hit the balls nicely.

My question is, is this guy from American Golf talking nonsense and trying to convince us that these clubs are either one size fits all or we are a very rare case of picking up a set of professional clubs and they coincidently fit perfectly?

I did return six weeks later to ask him about is theory as to why we shouldn't have them fitted and he just fobbed me off saying about the tape test and that the lie is fine.

If you and your brother adjusted your stance to ensure the club head was flush to the floor you masked any possible results from the lie board test.

Were you both standing at your normal height when addressing the ball?  Were your arms hanging down perpendicular to the ground?  It's like holding in your stomach in while they measure your waist when getting fit for pants and then being surprised the pants fit a bit snug.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think we have similar stances and therefore have different hands placements. I thought custom fitting was supposed to adjust the shaft length in order for me to have a consistent hand placement across the irons. Maybe I am fitted to the clubs however surely someone 4 inches smaller than me would compensate by having extra shaft handle above their placed hands. If we both held the club in the same places then either the lie would be wrong or one of us would be standing in an unorthodox stance. (Too upright/downright) Surely there is a standard hand placement on a club taking into account types of shots i.e. Further down the shaft for tiny chips onto greens.

Note: This thread is 3765 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.