Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6545 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

2 members have voted

  1. 1. Cleveland CG or Titleist Vokey

    • Cleveland CG
      58
    • Titleist Vokey
      74
    • Other...and indicate which
      14


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
Buy a Vokey if you need something to match your stylish Scotty Cameron and impress the boys at the Country Club with 20 handicaps. Just another case of the Titleist marketing machine.

C'mon, get real. Pros wouldn't use the wedges if they were just marketing, and Titleist wedges tend to outnumber Cleveland wedges with professionals. And good amateurs.

And both cost about the same.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I have to say Vokeys, rac TPs, and CG's are great wedges. It's a feel question. What feels best for you? The cost is about the same for them within $10-$20.

Driver: 10.5* SuperQuad TP 1st Edition All Black V2 Stiff
5 Wood - 585.h 19* DG S300
Irons: 3-PW S59 Stiff
Wedges: Rac TP 52*, 60* MP-T 56*
Putter(s): Anser 3 TP Black ballGET TO SINGLE DIGITS!Goal: Beat a certain admin that lives in my town


Posted
C'mon, get real. Pros wouldn't use the wedges if they were just marketing, and Titleist wedges tend to outnumber Cleveland wedges with professionals. And good amateurs.

They are always equally rated amongst Golf magazines, but I'm sure the Tour players receive incentives to play the Vokeys (which Titleist probably has a bigger bank account to pull from).

Golf Digest rated the CG12's better than the Vokey's this year. The name has a lot to do with why people play Titleist. I admit I used to play nothing but Titleist balls because I was socialized and led to believe that nothing is better than Titleist. It just isn't true. Golfers are supersticious. We don't like to change things. Golfers like to have the "cool" stuff. Why else would anyone play a Scotty Cameron putter? All in all, I will admit that pre-CG12, the Vokeys were a little better, but I think the ZipGroove has become the equalizer or the "one-upper".

---"Be the ball"---

IN THE Hoofer Vantage BAG:
Driver: F-Speed 10.5°, Aldila NV-F
Woods: F-Speed LD 3 & 5, Aldila NV-FIrons: S9 3-PW, NS-Pro 900XH SteelWedges: CG10 52° & Spin Milled 56.10Putter: Studio Select Newport 2Ball: Pro V1x SG4


  • Administrator
Posted
All in all, I will admit that pre-CG12, the Vokeys were a little better, but I think the ZipGroove has become the equalizer or the "one-upper".

And I disagree, and wrote about 1700 words on it, too.

Still, the tone of your post above is quite a bit different from the one I responded to earlier. I disagree with you that the CG-12 is better, the Vokey is good "only" for "impressing" people, that it's purely the "marketing machine," etc. Have an opinion and all, but don't be dumb about it and attribute a club as successful as the Vokey line to "marketing machine" hype. That's just silly.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Golfers are supersticious. We don't like to change things.

Maybe because I like them better than any other one I tried? If a cheaper putter suits you just fine than whats it to you to worry about why others choose something else


Posted
i have tried vokeys in the past and i dont think they are anything that special because i like a solid feeling wedge rather thatn a soft feeling one. a wedge that i really like is the tm tp wedges they are really great but if you like a soft feel i would stick with the cleveland or the voke. just my .02$

Burner 10.5* driver
Burner 3 wood GD Pershing Shaft
Burner 5 wood GD Pershing Shaft
Tour Burner irons
Rac black 52* Rac satin 60* Red x 3 pro v1


Posted
I have always played the callaway X series wedges 56 & 60 but this year I am going to try the Cleveland CG-12s

Taylormade Superquad 9.5
Taylormade hybrid 3, 4,5
MP-57 5-P
Cleveland 56 & 60
Scotty Cameron PutterPro V-1


Posted
I traded in my CG10s for a couple Vokeys. I loved the CG10s around the green, but I had a difficult time with my distance control on full shots. I love the Vokeys.
In my bag
Driver: Burner 460 9.5°
Fairway: V-Steel 15°
Utility: Rescue Dual 16°, 22°
Irons: 755 (5-PW)Wedges: Vokey 50°, SM 56°, SM 64°Putter: Newport 2 Pro PlatinumBall: ProV1

Posted
I actaully prefer the CG10 to the CG12, actually. The 12 produced almost no more spin than I have with my current CG10. Ill save for some vokeys.

Posted
I use a new Cleveland 56 degree with zip grooves. I just changed out a Cleveland that was getting a little old. I really like it because it's very flexible in sand, turf, and for a cool little dead-hand shot around greens that need a lot of spin.

Posted
I am considering getting some Cleveland cg14s and I was wondering significant loss of feel due to the elastomer piece. I have heard conflicting stories.
In the blue and tan grom Bag:

Driver r7 460 10.5*
Fairway Woods '07 Burner 15* and 18*
Irons 4-PW r7 XDWedges 47*, 52*, 58* CG14,Putter TiffanyBall One Tour D

Posted
I am considering getting some Cleveland cg14s and I was wondering significant loss of feel due to the elastomer piece. I have heard conflicting stories.

not at all they feel like a normal wege just a tad softer

Burner 10.5* driver
Burner 3 wood GD Pershing Shaft
Burner 5 wood GD Pershing Shaft
Tour Burner irons
Rac black 52* Rac satin 60* Red x 3 pro v1


Posted
I personally play the cg12 but i've tried the cg14's. They feel great actually. For me the Chrome cg12's have a slightly firm feel.

All in all they are easier to hit, make hard cover balls feel not so bad, have a nice large hitting area for flops and i understand come pro's are using it now....

Driver SS 93-95mph
6 iron SS 77-80mph

Driver: Burner 9.5 S
3 Wood: G10 SIrons 3-pw: MP-57 Dynalite Gold SL S300Wedges: 52 and 56 CG12 60 X- Forged CG/MDPutter: TiffanyBall: NXT TourI have no brand loyalty


  • 1 month later...
Posted
Isnt this the 3rd or 4th Cg12 vs. Spin Milled thread? We have search button for a reason.

Whats in my Warbird Hot Bad:

Driver: 907D1 9.5 - 65-S Aldila VS Proto --- FT-IQ coming soon?
2 Hybrid: Rescue mid-TP 16 deg
3 Hybrid: Rescue TP - HC Tour Only Model 19 deg - DG X-1004-PW: 695CB Irons - Project X 6.0Wedges Vokey SM58, Vokey SM54, Vokey 250Putter Futura PhantomWhere I WorkMy...


Posted
I can't say much for the vokey's, but I have a 54* and 60* set of CG12. They are great from the sand, but for the price you pay I would expect them to spin the ball more. One piece of advice if you go with cleveland is not to get the chromo finish unless you want to see spots all day when it is sunny. The reflect the sun right into you eyes.

In My Bag:
Driver: 907D2 9.5*
3 Wood: 906F2 13*
5 Wood: 906F2 18*
Irons: : MP-32: 3-PWWedges: : Vokey 54.10 and 60.4Putter: Circa 62 Charcoal Mist Model #6


Posted
I use Cleveland CGs (11 & 12 series). I honestly think it is a matter of personal preference. I also recently used some Nickent wedges and was impressed. The CGs do seem to wear fairly quickly compared to others, but I like the feel and results.

You can't go wrong either way.
Whats in my bag:
Driver: Cleveland Launcher 460
Fairway/Hybrid: 15 & 19 degree Nickent 3dx Utility
Irons: MacGregor M565
Wedges: Cleveland 900 RTG 54 & 58 degreePutter: Odyssey DFX 2 ball

Posted
Im a fan of my CG14s. The insert is actualy really nice, eliminates a lot of the vibration without sacrificing feel. Plus I liked the top side visual profile of the CG14s more than the Vokey, its a little bigger with that spoonish shape.

In the Sasquatch Tour Stand Bag

L4V 9* Fujikura Rombax Z 6Z08
S9-1 Pro 15* Matrix OZIK X-Con
Baffler Pro 21* Golfsmith P2 irons - 4-PW True Temper Dynamic Gold X100 CG14 Chrome Wedges Dynamic Gold X100 52* 56* 60* Rossa Monza SpiderBall - TP Red


Note: This thread is 6545 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Depends on how short you were coming up on these shots. A bit more wind? Also, maybe you were swinging at 2-3 mph slower the next day.  I think the biggest thing is not adjusting. Like making assuming your stock shot is not enough and taking 1 club up. Not sure what type of adjustments you were making in your decision making. 
    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.