Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lots of discussions about various analyzers, but can't find one about these two in comparison.

I'm thinking of getting an analyzer as I am sure I have some basic swing faults. I've been to lots of pros, but can't afford a weekly session and I'm hoping that one of these gadgets will help provide some fedback.

I've narrowed it down to the Skypro or the Zepp 3D. I like the data that Skypro gives, but like the idea of being able to wear the Zepp during a round of golf to see how my shots vary in play.

Does anyone have any experience of these two and can you impart any knowledge?


Posted

I have both SkyPro and Zepp 2.0.  

The biggest difference is SkyPro is attached to the shaft of the club and Zepp 2.0 attaches to your golf glove.  In terms of information, they give you similar feedback about your swing, swing speed, face angles, tempo etc but Zepp provides some addition views of not only the club but your hands as well.  

I liked SkyPro a lot but moving it from club to club and calibrating it each time with your phone can get annoying.  Zepp attaches to you golf glove (a problem for those who don't wear gloves) and needs to be calibrated only once unless something goes wrong.  Swapping clubs with Zepp requires just a few touches of the app.  

In terms of the app, I actually like Zepp better in that it will ask you to swing 3 or 10 times and based on the data that's captured, suggest drills for you to work on to improve your swing.  I also found Zepp to be more accurate with regards to my swing speed.  

I bought SkyPro 2 years ago so I'm not sure if the device they offer today is any better than the one I have but based on my own testing I'd recommend Zepp 2.0.  

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Thanks for this.

I stopped wearing a glove a couple of months ago. I don't think it will be too much of an imposition to start again. 


Note: This thread is 3495 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 18 (5 Feb 26) - Another day of inside work - grandson wanted to do a putting skills session - from stetting up impossible hole targets (try rolling from carpet to hardwood knowing you have to hit hard enough to get to the floor but not so fast as to blow by the target cup….talk about pace).  Finished with me working a two ball drill (line both up side by side and then make a solid stroke where the balls roll out together-a great drill in keeping the face square at impact).  A fun day. 
    • Yea, that test is strange. Especially when he starts talking about hip hinge at set up.  I think you could do an assortment of hip mobility test to determine if they can hinge correctly. Ask them, hey are your hamstrings tight when you get into the set up. Can you actually hinge at the hips.  I think the hamstring test is kind of pointless.       
    • Day 47 - 2026-02-05 Played a slooow 9 holes so bailed at the turn. Ball striking was exceptional for me, full swing anyway. I need to reinvest time in partial wedges.
    • This video is 11 years old and Dave Pelz has since passed on. And the video above reminded me of this gem of a thread: I have two issues with this video. First, Dave's math is once again wrong. Winners historically putt to a level where it accounts for 35% of their "win." Very little of a win is short game, leaving most of the 65% for the full swing. Second, and perhaps most importantly… he makes the opposite point he thinks he's making. He proves that the short game is easier and that putting is easier to reach a high level, and that most people have no hope of improving their full swing to the point where they can compete with a PGA Tour player. Because that's the area where better players separate themselves the most. That's the area where the biggest batch of strokes to be gained or lost exists for almost every player.
    • TPI (@mytpi) • Instagram reel 617 likes, 10 comments - mytpi on February 2, 2026: "Why test the Toe Touch if you don’t do it in your golf swing? Because it reveals how well you can hip hinge, a foundational movement for posture in golf. When... That's the original link… here's my YouTube copy of the same video: Here's what a… let's go with "knowledgeable" friend said to me about this video: Why on earth would you need to test someone's ability to touch their toes to see if they have the physical capability to get into a good set up position? At the beginning of the video Greg demonstrates the hip hinge movement he wants, just see if they can do that. No toe touching required! He also said they aren't interested in whether a golfer can actually touch their toes, he's trying to see how they hinge from their hips. This doesn't make any sense, as in their screening the criteria is pass or fail for touching toes, there's no scoring for how the person did it, other than that they didn't bend their knees… which is again moronic because you can bend your knees in the swing! The toe touch isn't a hip hinge test either: it's a hip hinge and spinal flexion test. Everyone that touches their does does so with a combo of both. It's a perfect example of a screening being a distraction rather than additive. Sure, having good mobility is better than not, but how can a toe touch be informative of the ability to get into a good setup? You can just ask the golfer to set up and see if they can do what you want! I think it's interesting how many PGA Tour players fail at the TPI tests. P.S. The Toe Touch test has always been, AFAIK, about the hamstrings. Tight hamstrings = gonna early extend. (But even that's not a truth.)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.