Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3299 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lots of discussions about various analyzers, but can't find one about these two in comparison.

I'm thinking of getting an analyzer as I am sure I have some basic swing faults. I've been to lots of pros, but can't afford a weekly session and I'm hoping that one of these gadgets will help provide some fedback.

I've narrowed it down to the Skypro or the Zepp 3D. I like the data that Skypro gives, but like the idea of being able to wear the Zepp during a round of golf to see how my shots vary in play.

Does anyone have any experience of these two and can you impart any knowledge?


Posted

I have both SkyPro and Zepp 2.0.  

The biggest difference is SkyPro is attached to the shaft of the club and Zepp 2.0 attaches to your golf glove.  In terms of information, they give you similar feedback about your swing, swing speed, face angles, tempo etc but Zepp provides some addition views of not only the club but your hands as well.  

I liked SkyPro a lot but moving it from club to club and calibrating it each time with your phone can get annoying.  Zepp attaches to you golf glove (a problem for those who don't wear gloves) and needs to be calibrated only once unless something goes wrong.  Swapping clubs with Zepp requires just a few touches of the app.  

In terms of the app, I actually like Zepp better in that it will ask you to swing 3 or 10 times and based on the data that's captured, suggest drills for you to work on to improve your swing.  I also found Zepp to be more accurate with regards to my swing speed.  

I bought SkyPro 2 years ago so I'm not sure if the device they offer today is any better than the one I have but based on my own testing I'd recommend Zepp 2.0.  

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3299 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • How would you change the rule to make it more "fair", and still be consistently interpreted and enforced?  It may not be perfect, but as a referee I can watch a player and look at the ground surface and make a ruling.  How can it be changed to address different players and their individual height, weight, and shoe size?
    • A bit old.. but this rule is kind of unfair ...  Lets say that you have Emiliano Grillo and Darren Clark playing together on a PGA event and on one hole both hit the ball to the middle of the fairway only 1 inch apart. When they arrive to the ball Darren take his stand and water comes out from the ground and remains there so he procceds take a free drop on a dry area and hit his shot.  Afterwards Grillo takes his stance in the same spot as Clark, but because he is a lot ligther, no water araise from the ground. According to the rules he is not allowed a free drop from the same spot darren had a free drop seconds before. I would love to see this happenning live on TV. Can an argument be made by grillo? could and official use the "spirit of the rule" to let him have a free drop?     
    • Day 84 (24 Jul 25) - Weekly nine hole round cancelled as the course was tied up with a ladies tournament.  No worries - set up with the 54deg wedge and worked on varied shots with green side focus in mine (those nGIR's).  Worked between high floaters and low spinners from varied lies replicating the types of lies I typically see on the courses around here.  
    • I meant lb for lb - so yes I agree it's wheel weight. How would you go about explaining that to someone? Perhaps the rotational inertia being higher with heavier wheels and the rotational inertia of the wheel requiring more torque to make its angular acceleration increase at the same rate? 
    • Day 7: Had a virtual putting lesson with @iacas. Spent some time afterwords working with the metronome. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...