Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3357 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Mostly wanting to hear from teaching pros.  I have set aside some funds to put towards golf.  I am currently playing a set of MX-23 irons (not fit for me).   I will say there is nothing really wrong with them.  But, I got them in 2004 and based on the improvements I got after getting a pro fit/new driver, I am thinking I might see some benefits from getting new clubs and more specifically getting them fit and custom made. At a minimum I am thinking I will get my current clubs retro fit.  But I am afraid by the time I get new shafts and adjustments made I might as well buy new and take advantage of new technology.  I am also thinking I will get at least a 5 pack of lessons.  I don't have an endless piggy bank to take a lesson a few times a week or the time.  But I would like to take one lesson every other week (with my schedule it is tuff to plan stuff in advance) and that would give me some time to practice what is covered.  

So here is the big question, do I take the lessons first so I can maybe fix some stuff in my swing and then get fit for clubs with my "newer" swing or get fit have perfect clubs for me to take full advantage of the lessons?  

If this helps: I played a fair amount of golf through college and shortly after.  Got down to a 15 handicap.  Got married, had kids ect, didn't swing a club for over 5 years.  Been back in the game for about 3 months or so and loving it.  Happy to be back in a place in my life were I can get out once a week or so plus a trip or two to the range.  Currently have about 15 rounds in since the break.  Tacked the last 8 rounds with an estimated 20 handicap.  Still knocking out cob webs especially in the short game.  


Posted

Appreciate I am not a pro but if you were a 15 handicap and your getting back towards that then you have a half decent swing to begin with, its not like your a complete newbie to the game shooting well over 100 where i would say custom fit clubs might not be the best first move.

In your case though I would highly recommend it, especially as your handicap was around the same level as mine is now, I found custom clubs to be of great benefit, not just to my game but to my confidence as well. I would suggest finding yourself a pro who does lessons and  club fitting and explain to him your goals, that way when he fits the clubs he will have in the back of his mind where you want to be so may fit the clubs to suit a potentially improved swing instead of fitting to the exact swing you have now if that makes sense?

 

The thing to also consider are things like driver flex, iron lies etc, if these are out, is there much point in shelling out for lessons where these may hold back your progress?

:tmade: Driver: TM Superfast 2.0 - 9.5degree - Reg flex
:mizuno: 3 Wood: JPX800 - 16* Exhsar5 Stiff
:mizuno: 3 - PW: MP-67 Cut Muscle back - S300 stiff
:slazenger: Sand Wedge: 54degree, 12degree bounce
:slazenger: Lob Wedge: 60degree 10degree bounce
:ping: Putter: Karsten 1959 Anser 2 Toe weighted
:mizuno: Bag - Cart Style


Posted (edited)

Thanks carpe4300, someone else mentioned that as well.  But I was hesitant based on not wanting someone who does club fittings as a "side job" rather then a expert at a specific club fitting location. I live on the west coast in socal, so I am fortunet to have several of the major manufactures close by plus 2 of golf digest top 100 fitters less then a hour away.  So I was planing on getting fit by one of those options.  

Is that the way to go as far as getting fit or does it not really make a difference?

Edited by Moose9018

Posted

I got fit by a local shop using a trackman and they fitted me with the right loft and right shaft etc and my shots really improved (with my driver) but it transpired to be fit for that swing, so now im swinging faster and better its not the best it could be, but its not far off

 

Thats why i mentioned choosing a pro to do lessons with that can also fit your clubs, he may look at your numbers and be like "this club you have is not right for you, but neither is this one however with lessons it will be for XYZ reason" 

:tmade: Driver: TM Superfast 2.0 - 9.5degree - Reg flex
:mizuno: 3 Wood: JPX800 - 16* Exhsar5 Stiff
:mizuno: 3 - PW: MP-67 Cut Muscle back - S300 stiff
:slazenger: Sand Wedge: 54degree, 12degree bounce
:slazenger: Lob Wedge: 60degree 10degree bounce
:ping: Putter: Karsten 1959 Anser 2 Toe weighted
:mizuno: Bag - Cart Style


Note: This thread is 3357 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have a couple of trips planned, although golf was a secondary component in each.  In February we're going to visit some friends near Naples, so Mary Anne and I have added on a few days to stay and play at Streamsong.  Then In March we're going to Hawaii (again), and will almost certainly get in a few rounds there.
    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.