Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3102 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 5/12/2017 at 3:37 PM, dennyjones said:

My personal experience.   I'm a bogie golfer.   I went to Carl's Golfland (Michigan) and was fitted for a driver.   I know nothing about shafts but was fitted using Trackman.  My distance increase 30 yards from what I was playing and my pattern was tighter.   I'm convinced the newer tech has helped me.

I'm calling b.s on this. Go Tigers though!


Posted

The actual technology advances as new drivers are released are much smaller these days.  Since the size and COR have been maxed-out, the manufacturers started experimenting with different materials and re-positioning weight for more forgiveness and/or a more efficient trajectory.

The biggest technology breakthroughs recently have been the adjustable hosel and adjustable weights.  These are noticeable for anyone at any level.  Most companies will have their own feature that they emphasize to try to separate themselves from everyone else.  Some are kind of "fluff", but some are legit. Here are a couple of examples:

Bridgestone introduced a new feature last year called Power Milling Technology.  Grooves are milled into the face of the driver to reduce spin, improve the compression time and reduce sidespin.

5939f6dc507de_jgrpowermilling.PNG.b5967883049610e7a7a44bea52cd07e5.PNG

Does it work?  Yes.  Is it a huge difference?  No, not really.  This alone wouldn't be enough of a reason to buy a new driver in my opinion.  They also developed FAST Crown Technology.  This means the crown of the driver flexes which produces more ball speed, a higher launch angle with less spin:

FAST_redo.png.1282e9601eaa3a90b8013a5551b92683.png

This is pretty significant.  This does make a noticeable difference.  All other companies have a design that flexes at the bottom of the club, which creates a lower launch. This is why they started the "loft up" campaign.  Do you have to have this?  Again, no, but something like this would be enough to consider the next time you're in the market for a new driver.

But most drivers that are within a couple of generations of the current models are not going to be antiquated in my opinion...they will still perform well.

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3102 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.