Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2665 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The other evening I teed off on a par four over water. Hooked the ball and it solidly hit a big tree. No one saw where it deflected to. It could have come back about 30 yards into the water but pretty sure it did not as we would have seen the splash. It probably bounced left 10 yards into a wooded area that is marked as a lateral hazard with red stakes. We decided to play it as if it went into the lateral hazard since we could not find it in the rough or fareway. I am thinking that it should have been played as a lost ball from the tee again. Could one of you rules experts please answer what the correct call is. Thank you.

  • Upvote 1

  • Administrator
Posted

Virtual certainty is required. Sounds like you didn't have it.

The ball was lost.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

http://www.usga.org/rules/rules-and-decisions.html#!decision-26

As iacas says it is likely that it should have been played as a lost ball because, as you explain it, it does not seem to meet the definition of it being virtually certain to be in the lateral hazzard. One other suggestion is that when you are on the tee and you hit a tree near two hazzards and no one saw where it went, you should consider hitting a provisional ball from the tee to speed play. Your buddies might have agree to a drop from the lateral hazzard just to speed play. Above link is to rule 26 explaining the term "virtual certainty".

  • Thumbs Up 1

Posted
On ‎8‎/‎13‎/‎2018 at 9:39 PM, Foozer Scott said:

...I am thinking that it should have been played as a lost ball from the tee again.

You are correct.  You have a decent understanding of the Rules.  Good job.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2665 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 430 - 2025-12-04 Slow motion backswings (with chippy shots) with AlmostGolf balls.
    • Day 24 (4 Dec 25) - Spent about an hour working with the new 55° wedge in the backyard.  Kept all shots to under 20yds.  Big focus - not decelerating thru downswing and keeping speed up with abbreviated backswing.  Nothing like hitting a low flighted chip with plenty of check spin and then purpose to float a pitch of similar distance.  
    • Day 114 12-4 Put some work in on backswing, moving the hips correctly, then feeling over to lead side. Didn't hit any balls was just focused on keeping flowy and moving better. I'll probably do another session tonight and add in some foam balls.
    • Didn't say anything about your understanding in my post.  Well, if you are not insisting on alignment with logic of the WHS, then no.  Try me/us. What do you want from us then?? You are not making sense. You come here and post in an open forum, question a system that is constructed with logic, without using any of your own and then give us a small window of your personal experience to support your narrative which at first sight does not makes sense.  I mean, if you are a point of swearing then I would suggest you cut your losses and humor a more gullible audience elsewhere. Good heavens.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.