Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
onanexpedition

Are my clubs too old? Still use oldies but goodies?

7 posts in this topic

Thanks, glad to be on this site.

Well, here's my first post.

I think maybe I can save a few strokes if I upgraded my equipment but am pretty happy with my set up right now.  Are these clubs too outdated?  Thanks.  Suggestions welcomed.

Driver - Titleist 905R

Titleist 904F 17* 4 Wood

Titleist 585H 21* 3 Hybrid

4-PW Bridgestone J33 CBs

Cleveland TA Reg Chrome 588 56 SW and 60 LW

Ping Anser 3 Manganese Bronze Putter.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

only YOU can decide whether it's time to "upgrade" or change anything in your set.  if you're having difficulty with any of them then then having them checked is called for.  if not then maybe only a lesson or two is called for.  either way don't let anyone sell you anything that doesn't "feel right" to you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by tweaky

only YOU can decide whether it's time to "upgrade" or change anything in your set.  if you're having difficulty with any of them then then having them checked is called for.  if not then maybe only a lesson or two is called for.  either way don't let anyone sell you anything that doesn't "feel right" to you.


Thanks, I am going to stick with these for awhile.  I went into a crazy phase of upgrading to the latest drivers, wedges, woods and putters but they never really helped.  As you said, a lesson or more focused practice is probably what I need.  I am determined to improve this year.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested in the same sort of question.  I guess another way of asking it would be:

"To what extent could I expect my game to improve by moving from my older equipment to more modern equipment?"

OR:

"At what point do recent technology gains justify upgrading equipment?"

Something like that anyway.

If you have opinions about that, I'd be interested in hearing answers.  I'm relatively new to the game (started about 2 years ago, don't have much time to play or practice -- max of one trip to the range, one round per week, but more like two hours at the range and one round every two weeks), and I put together a Hogan set on the cheap:

Hogan C-S3 455 Driver,

Hogan C 455 3 & 5 woods,

Hogan BH-5 irons 3-PW,

Hogan Riviera Wedges (54, 60)

Hogan Bettinardi "The Hawk" putter (BHB 11 HK)

My feeling right now is that my swing is so inconsistent that I could be playing with pretty much any clubs and it wouldn't affect my game much.  If I can start to play consistently in the high 80s, I figure I might use that as justification to upgrade my equipment (and maybe do a club-fitting).

I'm new enough to the game that I don't think I really know much, and I'm interested in hearing opinions from those who are more experienced (or just more opinionated) than I am.

So, any opinions for the OP? For me?  ...thanks in advance.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, looking at your set makes me feel bad.  I just "upgraded" to a set of Ping I3+ irons and a 907D1 driver.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Roblar

I'm interested in the same sort of question.  I guess another way of asking it would be:

"To what extent could I expect my game to improve by moving from my older equipment to more modern equipment?"

OR:

"At what point do recent technology gains justify upgrading equipment?"

Something like that anyway.

If you have opinions about that, I'd be interested in hearing answers.  I'm relatively new to the game (started about 2 years ago, don't have much time to play or practice -- max of one trip to the range, one round per week, but more like two hours at the range and one round every two weeks), and I put together a Hogan set on the cheap:

Hogan C-S3 455 Driver,

Hogan C 455 3 & 5 woods,

Hogan BH-5 irons 3-PW,

Hogan Riviera Wedges (54, 60)

Hogan Bettinardi "The Hawk" putter (BHB 11 HK)

My feeling right now is that my swing is so inconsistent that I could be playing with pretty much any clubs and it wouldn't affect my game much.  If I can start to play consistently in the high 80s, I figure I might use that as justification to upgrade my equipment (and maybe do a club-fitting).

I'm new enough to the game that I don't think I really know much, and I'm interested in hearing opinions from those who are more experienced (or just more opinionated) than I am.

So, any opinions for the OP? For me?  ...thanks in advance.


I think I just answered my own question reading your post.

I like your Hogan clubs.  I believe the woods are Hogan's last offering and the driver if I remember right is over 400 cc, the BH-5 are very nice cavity back cast irons, Hogan's first cast clubs I believe and the Riviera wedges are forged I think.  The Bettinardi Hogan Hawk is also very effective.  Learning from experience, 20 years golfing now, stay with what you have right now and groove your swing or better yet, get a lesson.  When you start shooting mid 80's or so, then perhaps you can treat yourselves to some new equipment.  But in my opinion, all your equipment is pretty current meaning nothing game changing since those Hogan clubs but of course others will disagree.  Later on, you can go insane like all of us wanting the latest driver and the most effective shaft but in the end, it all comes down to your swing and your ability to score with your short game.

I am looking at my old set of Tommy Armour 845s Silver Scots and these are almost 20 years old and I can just change the grips on these and play them, not much difference with the modern irons.  Small blade like profile with enough offset for forgiveness.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • 2016 BMW PGA Championship at Wentworth
      Nice to see Chris Wood win this,well done.He tends to play well in the British Open with a best T3 at Turnberry maybe this win will spur him on. Surely another Ryder cup player.
    • Your best golfing bargain
      I got two: Played Orange County National (Orlando) for 50 dollar. Including lunch and both Crooked cat and Panther lake. And got vouchers to play the course next time for half the normal price. Played a three day tourney in Sauerland (Germany) including a pré tourney round for 220 dollar. During the three days ALL drinks for free, food for free, last day dinner for free. Not just a hamburger, but full fetched all you can eat top meal (and again all drinks for free). Will be back next year 
    • GPS, WHY ?
      It comes down to how big are your shot zones. It's usually better to try to line up the shot zone center to the center of the green.
    • Are you a Better Golfer than a Year Ago?
      And confirmation. Last year I played a three day tournament in Germany and scored 82, 86 and 91. Same tourney this year 80, 83 and 86. Happy 
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      Here's some more below about the lowest you might expect - even on an easy course. I think this is largely true, but pros don't tend to play a lot on 'easy' courses so there doesn't seem to be even much anecdotal stuff. The quote below describes what's considered the 'perfect round'. I guess you could also consider a 'go-for-green' perfect round where you also hit all the par 5's in two and one-putted those for eagle for a 'go-for-green perfect' score of 50. Obviously the likelihood of doing this in a single round defies the essence of golf, but it's a good a hard theoretical lower limit that probably depends more on the par than the course rating. Likely the odds grow exponentially as the percentage of birdied / eagled holes rises. I think we can discount albatrosses as a 'perfect round' option. Most tournament pro scores don't get below 56 and 59 with about an 80/20 rule separating the more frequent 59s from the 58's. That's 4-5 strokes (assuming par 72) over the 'perfect round' and 8-9 over the 'go-for-green perfect round', each of which represent grabbing about 75% and 61% respectively of the potential shots under par realistically available. I suppose a short par-4 would add another potential eagle opportunity, but we'll discount that as I'm not sure how universal they are. The lowest tournament round was 55 (par of 71) by one single golfer out of how many total tournament rounds by pros and plus HCP amateurs over the years? So while 55 is humanly achievable it's super rare and likely represents the lower limit of any possible likelihood. That would put the absolute lowest threshold around 17.8 below the course rating (72.8) and 16 below par. So there's a lot of room to go below even a low course rating or par of 70. I don't think the expected scores would get too squished and the distribution would still likely be normal in shape. The thing that is probably unrealistic is how narrow the range of expected scores is. The field is extremely consistent, but I think a single individual player (whose average score is the same as the field) will have a score variance significantly larger than the field. I think the mode likely stays the same while the distribution flattens / spreads out more into the tails with a little more probability to both go low and high and less certainty of shooting within a stroke or two of the mode / most likely score.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    No users celebrating today
  • Blog Entries