• Announcements

    • iacas

      Create a Signature!   02/05/2016

      Everyone, go here and edit your signature this week: http://thesandtrap.com/settings/signature/.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dwade247

Which Irons Should I Use?

11 posts in this topic

Should I use the iron (5-PW) / hybrid (3-4) set that came with my cheap box set of Trend golf clubs for under $200 I got about 8-10 years. I don't/can't hit the hybrids.

Or should I use a set of perfect condition Titleist Lite 100 irons(3-9) that first came out in 1979.

Which do you guys think I should use? Modern and cheap or old from quality brand?

Here is a site with some info about the Titleist Lite 100

http://www.titleist.com/golf-clubs/irons/Lite-100.aspx

I can't find any info on the Trend set.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I would go with the Titleist, as long as you're sure that they're mint. A set of good quality, classic blades from 1979 aren't that much different than a set of classic blades from 2014. Plus, they probably look amazing at address.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I'm with tmac....go with the titleist. They will teach you how to make better ball contact and they are a more trusted brand

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go with the Titleist, as long as you're sure that they're mint. A set of good quality, classic blades from 1979 aren't that much different than a set of classic blades from 2014. Plus, they probably look amazing at address.

They look mint to me. Obviously they have been used, but it doesn't look like very much. Faces have now wear and the grips don't even have wear. Shafts look fine to me too. They are in better shape than my Trend clubs.

They look great at address!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with tmac....go with the titleist. They will teach you how to make better ball contact and they are a more trusted brand

This is one of the reasons I started looking for some old blade irons. (To learn how to better contact the ball)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second all the above, go with the Titleist.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys. Titleist it is!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright guys. Thanks for the replies earlier but I have an update on my iron situation. I went to the PGA superstore by me today to test my Titleist Lite 100 irons vs my GI irons. Let's just say I only hit about 2 or 3 descent shots with the Titleist irons. While on the other hand I hit many more good to descent shots with my GI irons.

I'm kind of thinking I should stick with my GI irons. I mean I have always played descent with them as my iron game was the best part of my game.

What do you guys think given the new info? Should I work with the blades till I learn to hit them or just learn to get better with my GI irons?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest you use newer GI or SGI irons until you start breaking 90. Also, consider taking a couple of lessons with the new clubs.

You might consider one of the legacy iron models by Callaway or TaylorMade. These are models from a couple of years ago which have been reissued with Uniflex shafts (between R and S flex). Callaway has the RazrX NG, and TM has a similar model. Both will cost you less than $400, and will be quite durable. Test hit them and see if you like them; a fitter could tweak lie and shaft length if need be.

If this is your big push for new irons, you want to hit them before you buy. I would suggest a good golf shop.

I fear you will have a very frustrating experience playing blades when you sometimes can't break 100. Hint: Many tour pros - including guys who win tournaments - use player's cavity irons rather than blades.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards and Achievements

I would suggest you use newer GI or SGI irons until you start breaking 90. Also, consider taking a couple of lessons with the new clubs.

You might consider one of the legacy iron models by Callaway or TaylorMade. These are models from a couple of years ago which have been reissued with Uniflex shafts (between R and S flex). Callaway has the RazrX NG, and TM has a similar model. Both will cost you less than $400, and will be quite durable. Test hit them and see if you like them; a fitter could tweak lie and shaft length if need be.

If this is your big push for new irons, you want to hit them before you buy. I would suggest a good golf shop.

I fear you will have a very frustrating experience playing blades when you sometimes can't break 100. Hint: Many tour pros - including guys who win tournaments - use player's cavity irons rather than blades.


Thanks for the advice. I was originally excited by the fact that I finally had some brand name clubs and that they were blades (make me look pro) Ha. But after hitting them today I realize my scores would sky rocket using them.

Idk if I am really in the market for new irons right now. I only tried the titleists cause I found them for 2 bucks a piece. I will however start collecting gift cards for my new irons, that I hope to purchase in a year or two. I did hit a callaway xhot (last years model) demo today also. I felt like I couldn't screw up a shot with that thing. Will definitely be on my radar when I have the funds for a new iron set purchase.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • How do I organize a charity tournament to be a raging success?
      26 and a stroke? Holy smokes. Very sorry to hear that.  I have no idea how to organize a tournament but I have played in my share. The best ones are scrambles where you can organize your own team. The outcome has rarely ever mattered to us as long as we were well fed. Find a local restaurant (usually a bbq place) that wants to help you out and give a discount for advertising and spend your money there. Everyone will love to come for a good meal. Some nice prizes and maybe a raffle with some local companies offering you something if you are able to convince them it is worth it to give something to the cause.  Another thing I have seen work well is a silent auction at the end with donated items. I donated airline miles of which I have tons and 100,000 miles went for $205. Free gift for me and the cause got $205. 
    • How to eliminate blowup holes
      Haha - I get a couple of reputation points for a post and then go and have a blow up hole. Good drive, left myself 145 in down hill (8i), aimed #deadcenter, pulled 2 shots 25 yards left out of bounds, made 9 (+5) in a 9 hole round of (+11). A better way to avoid blow up holes - play stableford!
    • Donald Trump for president?
      Come on now, that's a bit uncalled for in Bernies case.  His political ideals might be way left, but he is at least honest and virtuous.
    • Jack or Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?
      I'll have to examine your other post closer. That's a good point to consider about the expansion to Continental Europe. Largely explains the poor showing of UK & Ireland in the 60's with many top tier European players not eligible. But considering the 200 million U.S. population base to 63 million in the U.K. & Ireland at the time, the latter did surprisingly well if population base was all that matters. IMO an established competitive golfing culture matters in producing elite players too. Those same European players excluded from Ryder Cup were always eligible for the Majors. The Ryder Cup is also a limited field event. It concentrates the 12 top players of the European Tour. From what I've read, depth of field is still stronger for the 'typical' PGA event, though some non-major Euro events are now stronger than some of the 'minor' PGA events. That is a significant change in Euro competitiveness from the 60's. To some extent that 30% drop sounds like it could be due to simply more international players occupying slots in the fields. If the period you mention covers when majors started to use OWGR for automatic qualification that has some not insignificant inherent issues in terms of strength of field. Having a guaranteed start rather than having to qualify would certainly make for an easier decision to travel to the event. But I'm not arguing against the policy decision facilitating international competition with a little points boost just trying to point out that field strength may not have been as weak in Jack's day as you seem to think. Compared to his peers, which is really the only thing I think you can do without speculative nuance I agree there's no question he's the best golfer. I'm really just arguing that standouts of their caliber (so many more wins so many more majors) than typical players among already elite fields are so rare, that I expect they both represent near the achievable human pinnacle in golf talent, which I don't think really differs within a few generations. The nuances of comparison across eras is interesting to me so I'll debate relative points, but I'm against arguments undervaluing Jack's achievements against 'weak fields'. They both faced very stiff competition.   I'm not dissing Jack. I think his achievements are amazing. I also think the same of Tiger's record. IMO winning percentage per start in the Majors is a very significant stat and Tiger has that in his favor (they are both top 10 and within ~ 2% of each other's number). That number is not the official one for Jack though, I truncated his Major starts to end at age 47, which I think is a reasonable cutoff for competitiveness. If Tiger competes as long as Jack did his major win % (up to age 47) might stay about the same, increase, or decrease (more likely), but he certainly won't match the 18 Majors if he doesn't get like 22+ more major starts between now and age 47.
    • Wedges, Bounce, and Ground Conditions
      Typically more bounce (or a "healthy" amount of bounce) helps in any condition.  
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. glinks
      glinks
      (43 years old)
  • Blog Entries