Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
dwade247

Which Irons Should I Use?

11 posts in this topic

Should I use the iron (5-PW) / hybrid (3-4) set that came with my cheap box set of Trend golf clubs for under $200 I got about 8-10 years. I don't/can't hit the hybrids.

Or should I use a set of perfect condition Titleist Lite 100 irons(3-9) that first came out in 1979.

Which do you guys think I should use? Modern and cheap or old from quality brand?

Here is a site with some info about the Titleist Lite 100

http://www.titleist.com/golf-clubs/irons/Lite-100.aspx

I can't find any info on the Trend set.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

I would go with the Titleist, as long as you're sure that they're mint. A set of good quality, classic blades from 1979 aren't that much different than a set of classic blades from 2014. Plus, they probably look amazing at address.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm with tmac....go with the titleist. They will teach you how to make better ball contact and they are a more trusted brand

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go with the Titleist, as long as you're sure that they're mint. A set of good quality, classic blades from 1979 aren't that much different than a set of classic blades from 2014. Plus, they probably look amazing at address.

They look mint to me. Obviously they have been used, but it doesn't look like very much. Faces have now wear and the grips don't even have wear. Shafts look fine to me too. They are in better shape than my Trend clubs.

They look great at address!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with tmac....go with the titleist. They will teach you how to make better ball contact and they are a more trusted brand

This is one of the reasons I started looking for some old blade irons. (To learn how to better contact the ball)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Alright guys. Thanks for the replies earlier but I have an update on my iron situation. I went to the PGA superstore by me today to test my Titleist Lite 100 irons vs my GI irons. Let's just say I only hit about 2 or 3 descent shots with the Titleist irons. While on the other hand I hit many more good to descent shots with my GI irons.

I'm kind of thinking I should stick with my GI irons. I mean I have always played descent with them as my iron game was the best part of my game.

What do you guys think given the new info? Should I work with the blades till I learn to hit them or just learn to get better with my GI irons?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest you use newer GI or SGI irons until you start breaking 90. Also, consider taking a couple of lessons with the new clubs.

You might consider one of the legacy iron models by Callaway or TaylorMade. These are models from a couple of years ago which have been reissued with Uniflex shafts (between R and S flex). Callaway has the RazrX NG, and TM has a similar model. Both will cost you less than $400, and will be quite durable. Test hit them and see if you like them; a fitter could tweak lie and shaft length if need be.

If this is your big push for new irons, you want to hit them before you buy. I would suggest a good golf shop.

I fear you will have a very frustrating experience playing blades when you sometimes can't break 100. Hint: Many tour pros - including guys who win tournaments - use player's cavity irons rather than blades.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would suggest you use newer GI or SGI irons until you start breaking 90. Also, consider taking a couple of lessons with the new clubs.

You might consider one of the legacy iron models by Callaway or TaylorMade. These are models from a couple of years ago which have been reissued with Uniflex shafts (between R and S flex). Callaway has the RazrX NG, and TM has a similar model. Both will cost you less than $400, and will be quite durable. Test hit them and see if you like them; a fitter could tweak lie and shaft length if need be.

If this is your big push for new irons, you want to hit them before you buy. I would suggest a good golf shop.

I fear you will have a very frustrating experience playing blades when you sometimes can't break 100. Hint: Many tour pros - including guys who win tournaments - use player's cavity irons rather than blades.


Thanks for the advice. I was originally excited by the fact that I finally had some brand name clubs and that they were blades (make me look pro) Ha. But after hitting them today I realize my scores would sky rocket using them.

Idk if I am really in the market for new irons right now. I only tried the titleists cause I found them for 2 bucks a piece. I will however start collecting gift cards for my new irons, that I hope to purchase in a year or two. I did hit a callaway xhot (last years model) demo today also. I felt like I couldn't screw up a shot with that thing. Will definitely be on my radar when I have the funds for a new iron set purchase.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • My Swing (b101)
      It's just feeling a little bit more natural than it used to and I'm not stepping on the course with 5 or more swing thoughts, which is nice! I don't think it'll take much work getting back to making progress and I'm definitely seeing that some of the changes I've made have stuck - ball flight is really high compared to what I'm used to and the ball turns right to left about 50% of the time and stays straight for 30%. It's the 20% of rubbish, either duck hooks or generally wayward tee shots that I want to clear up, which is going to be this morning's target on the range. I didn't end up hitting the range yesterday - a mate texted to ask to play a round, so I went for that. What was obvious is that the little 9 hole course, where I don't need anything above a 4 iron, has been great for my iron play, but that the 3 wood, driver and course management need a bit of a refresher course. Shot an 86 with a ridiculous 7 penalty strokes (4 on one tough par 3), which says it all really as I don't normally take any! It is a tight track though and there is OB all over the place, but no excuse for the few 'head off' moments which prevented me scoring well. It was match play as well so I guess that's part of it... In short summary: Driving/3 wood - pretty poor and I'm just not comfortable over the ball with those clubs. On a longer course, I'd have struggled. Long irons - good, bar that atrocity of a par 3, where I think I'll just aim way left next time and take the safe miss. Both of those were actually really nice strikes, but went dead straight rather than drawing like I had expected. Still, my fault entirely for aiming towards the trouble  Mid-short irons - mostly pretty good actually. Put 6/14 approaches from outside 100 yards to (3/4 from within 100) inside 15 yards and bar two long bunker shots, the rest were manageable. Putting - really pleased again; I probably only made one that I wouldn't have expected (birdie on 13), but there's a lot of break on the greens and I thought it was pretty decent for a first time out in a while. http://www.gamegolf.com/player/benpage101/round/930037 Overall, pretty close to where I'd want it to be, but a better decision on 6, some better drives and a bit more luck on odd holes (like 16) and it'd have been a great round. I'd take that for the first time in ages. Should be able to post some video this afternoon.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      And also, "speculation" is what the thread is all about! Sure, I'm placing the Tour guys on a pedestal but they DESERVE it. Yes "Golf is Hard", but those guys are GOOD. Low 60s are very much a possibility in any tournament they tee it up in, let alone on a public course that was designed with the average golfer in mind. Let's give credit where credit is due! If all the players from 75-125 on the money list decided to go out and play a new course (of "moderate difficulty" for amateurs) every week for the next 2 months, course records would be getting smashed all over the place. They might shoot the odd 70 or 72, but you darn well bet there would be a lot of 63's and 64's in there too. Regardless of poor course conditions, lack of course knowledge or anything like that, they are gonna make birdies in droves and they are going to go low!
    • The this math does not compute thread
      I was at a garage sale with my son who was like 10 years old at the time. The seller had a box full of cheap toys with a handwritten sign on the box that read "$1 each, or 2 for $3".  I nudged my son and pointed to the sign with my eyes (because the seller was standing right there). He glanced down at the sign and immediately grinned and shook his head in disbelief. And don't get me going on auctions. People will pay more for used crap than they know they would if purchased brand new, simply because they get caught up in a bidding war. The best part is listening to them try and justify it afterwards.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      The odds of him shooting -32 would be slim, but not impossible. Those guys absolutely demolish a handful of the easier courses (ie. Kapalua, the old rotation for the Las Vegas Invitational, the old rotation for the Bob Hope, TPC Scottsdale before they toughened it up,  North Course at Torrey, etc.) and scores of ~ -30 haven't been terribly uncommon at some events. But I think the PGA Tour and the Web.Com Tour seem to be trying to get away from insanely low numbers and are moving tournaments away from some of the old venues that can't keep up with how far  they hit the ball now, and renovating other courses to beef them up. I recall the Tour players voted to eliminate the TPC Stadium course at PGA West in the late 80's from tournanent play because they thought it was "too hard" and this year when they used it again it seemed to be quite playable for them. In fact, they seemed to have no issues making their way around the course at all. That speaks to the quality and depth of the fields nowadays.  That being said - no, I wouldn't expect a -32 total. But it definitely wouldn't shock me either.  On a side note, I would be really interested to see this type of experiment revisited. This thread has fuelled some great speculation and debate, so thank you guys for playing along!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries