Jump to content
IGNORED

What advantages/disadvantages do different sole widths give you?


Note: This thread is 4281 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

golf clubs can have either thin, medium, or wide sole widths. what are the advantages/disadvantages of the different sole widths?

In My Ozone Stand Bag:
Driver: Burner 10.5* Stiff
3 Wood: Burner 15* Stiff
Hybrid: Burner 19* Stiff
Irons: Tour Burner 4-GWWedges: CG14 54.12, 58.12Putter: SabertoothBall: TP Back Rangefinder: GX-IHome Course: http://www.strawberryridgegolfcourse.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Wide soles have a couple of purposes. The first reason is that they are typically more forgiving because the club designers use the wide soles as a way of moving club weight lower and further back from club face. The second reason for wide soles has to do with a player's swing. For those players who tend to 'dig' too much/too deep on swing the wider sole helps keep the club from digging as far into the turf.

For the most part, clubs with a thin sole tend to be clubs for better players as this allows the clubs to be more workable and more versatile. Wide soles can sometimes be problematic if you play on courses that are very firm or present lots of thin lies. They can be helpful for courses that have soft conditions.

There are good players that use clubs with wide soles as well. 2 PGA Tour players that use a wider sole are Kenny Perry and Michael Campbell. They both use them because they are 'diggers'. Many people just look at the soles on clubs and assume a thinner sole is a 'players' club, medium sole is a 'game improvement' club, with the wide soles being 'super game improvement' clubs. This is not necessarily always true anymore though.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites


As a matter of course, narrower soles are better suited to players with a shallower swing plane. Additionally, irons w/ narrower soles tend to perform better from very tight fairway lies. Conversely, a wider sole width is suggested to be a better fit for players w/ steeper and slower swings........ and perform better from plush and/or fluffy lies. The heads camber also plays a significant role in the sole's performance.

Good luck,

"The more you know...... the less you need"

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 3 years later...

Sorry to dig this thread up again after 4 years but i have a question.  i have recently purchased a set of Spalding Executive Irons 3-PW.  What drew me to them was that the soles were pretty wide and from what I understand they are from the late 60's early 70's.  So, i was surprised that thir sole was so wide but yet had a very traditional small blade "everything else".  Would these be considered an early game improvement iron?  Also i can post a picture if you folks would like.  Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have Hogan Apex Edge. They have very wide rounded bounce soles. They are great for most everything.

I also have Hogan 1963 IPT blades that have as equally wide of sole on the shorter clubs at least. However they have zero bounce and a knife blade edge where face meets sole. You had better be a rather accurate striker of the Ball. You have 2 choices. You take a divot where you want or you take a divot where you don't want. It will knife out a divot one way or the other.

Comparing the two extremes is one is for divot wanters and one is for no divot wanters. Also one is for plowing through the sand and one is for knifing into the sand where you want OR NOT where you want.

Likewise width of sole can produce similar effects where wide plows and narrow digs.  Wide may bounce/skip on hard earth while narrow may dig/slide

It is really common sense applied physics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4281 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • 46 (9 over) Short game and putts were awful!
    • 46+40 for an 86. I just need to play 9 holes on the range before each round. 🤣🤣🤣
    • I don’t measure my intake either. I generally have a black coffee, a bottle of soda, some sweet tea at home, and anything in between is water. An ice cold bottle of water is one of my favorite things. It feels like an immediate refresher for my body. I’ll admit that I need to drink a little more though. 
    • For such a nice membership, there have been some bad incidents in the past few years.  We had someone voted out a couple of years ago over something he did and he harassed the board members for three months until he moved out of the area.   Generally they’ve tried to do things like tournament handicaps and identify certain people who they know should be lower and adjust it somehow.  I can understand not wanting to go thru something like the guy who was voted out again i emailed the pro who forwarded it to the handicap committee.  They are going to see what can be done.  I walked someone thru what happened and they are going to nudge him to post the score from the match and see what he does.  Since he didn’t put anything in the electronic scoring past 13, based on how he played 14 and 15 plus having to take bogey on 16-18 for after he left, he should post 83.  We’ll see if it’s even higher,   Since he was really even thru 13, then doubled 14 and parred 15 my guess is he really shot 75 being generous and giving him 2 pars and a bogey on the three holes he didn’t play.    i shot 88, getting 16 shots for my course handicap which is net even and I lost on 13.  We do brackets where handicaps should be within 4-5 of each other.  Most matches only have 1-2 shots as a difference between players  neither of us posted the score yet.  There was something in the match play rules about whether or not to post your score.  I couldn’t remember if we were supposed to or not.  I don’t think he was going to post that, because even with his inflated score it would be the lowest score in his recent 20. Lucky I didn’t because they want to see what he does post and they don’t want me posting so he can try to calibrate his score.  
    • Got your hopes up a bit too high only to have them dashed today? A feel "expired"?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...