Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What advantages/disadvantages do different sole widths give you?


Note: This thread is 5056 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
golf clubs can have either thin, medium, or wide sole widths. what are the advantages/disadvantages of the different sole widths?

In My Ozone Stand Bag:
Driver: Burner 10.5* Stiff
3 Wood: Burner 15* Stiff
Hybrid: Burner 19* Stiff
Irons: Tour Burner 4-GWWedges: CG14 54.12, 58.12Putter: SabertoothBall: TP Back Rangefinder: GX-IHome Course: http://www.strawberryridgegolfcourse.com/


Posted
Wide soles have a couple of purposes. The first reason is that they are typically more forgiving because the club designers use the wide soles as a way of moving club weight lower and further back from club face. The second reason for wide soles has to do with a player's swing. For those players who tend to 'dig' too much/too deep on swing the wider sole helps keep the club from digging as far into the turf.

For the most part, clubs with a thin sole tend to be clubs for better players as this allows the clubs to be more workable and more versatile. Wide soles can sometimes be problematic if you play on courses that are very firm or present lots of thin lies. They can be helpful for courses that have soft conditions.

There are good players that use clubs with wide soles as well. 2 PGA Tour players that use a wider sole are Kenny Perry and Michael Campbell. They both use them because they are 'diggers'. Many people just look at the soles on clubs and assume a thinner sole is a 'players' club, medium sole is a 'game improvement' club, with the wide soles being 'super game improvement' clubs. This is not necessarily always true anymore though.
Driver: SQ DYMO STR8-Fit
4 Wood: SQ DYMO
2H (17*), 4H (23*) & 5H (26*): Fli-Hi CLK
Irons (5-6): MX-900; (7-PW): MP-60
Wedges (51/6*): MP-T Chrome; (56/13): MP-R ChromePutter: White Hot XG 2-Ball CSPreferred Ball: e5+/e7+/B330-RXGPS Unit: NEOPush Cart: 2.0

Posted
As a matter of course, narrower soles are better suited to players with a shallower swing plane. Additionally, irons w/ narrower soles tend to perform better from very tight fairway lies. Conversely, a wider sole width is suggested to be a better fit for players w/ steeper and slower swings........ and perform better from plush and/or fluffy lies. The heads camber also plays a significant role in the sole's performance.

Good luck,

"The more you know...... the less you need"


  • 3 years later...
Posted

Sorry to dig this thread up again after 4 years but i have a question.  i have recently purchased a set of Spalding Executive Irons 3-PW.  What drew me to them was that the soles were pretty wide and from what I understand they are from the late 60's early 70's.  So, i was surprised that thir sole was so wide but yet had a very traditional small blade "everything else".  Would these be considered an early game improvement iron?  Also i can post a picture if you folks would like.  Thanks!


Posted

I have Hogan Apex Edge. They have very wide rounded bounce soles. They are great for most everything.

I also have Hogan 1963 IPT blades that have as equally wide of sole on the shorter clubs at least. However they have zero bounce and a knife blade edge where face meets sole. You had better be a rather accurate striker of the Ball. You have 2 choices. You take a divot where you want or you take a divot where you don't want. It will knife out a divot one way or the other.

Comparing the two extremes is one is for divot wanters and one is for no divot wanters. Also one is for plowing through the sand and one is for knifing into the sand where you want OR NOT where you want.

Likewise width of sole can produce similar effects where wide plows and narrow digs.  Wide may bounce/skip on hard earth while narrow may dig/slide

It is really common sense applied physics.


Note: This thread is 5056 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 37, June 10.  Today was primarily WFH, so I had several practice sessions (indoors, off a mat, into the net).  At least one each of U, 9, and 6-iron full swings with the usual priority.   I also tried a few times a putting type stroke with my 4H, as something I should probably learn how to hit (and what it does), but the mechanical shot at home off a mat doesn't tell me much of what it's doing.  That's something I should probably try on a real green, not during a round until I've tried it.
    • Day 10 (10 Jun 26) - Played in the midweek shootout at my home course - on aerated and sanded greens - day of trying to figure tempo to get the best roll on the greens.  Approach game was decently solid as was shots off the tee.  
    • Ok, I'm trying to find a feel to hit a consistent ball flight (irons).  My current predicament.  1. I try to do the arms down stuff better, with the club feeling like it is way behind me more. It's just a cluster of results. Most of the time, I can't get any speed on the swing. If I get my arms down faster, I just throw them out.  2. I focus all my attention on turning better. Pushing off with my left leg and getting my right side through better. On the DTL view, this doesn't produce anywhere close where the hands and club should be. The result is usually ball first contact, lower ball flight, more centered contact.  At this point, I am going with option 2. Stop thinking about what the hands do. Just make a shorter backswing, keep it wide, turn through. Somehow, the club head finds the ball. My focus is so much on just making sure I turn, it's like, "Oh, that contact was better.... Oh, that bell flight looks playable." If not, I will just be practicing my entire summer.       
    • Nope, they spent too much money. They are in over 28 million on the football roster and related NIL compensation at this point. Boosters associated with any Texas college football team has HUGE sway. The AD is between a rock and a hard place. They put a lot of money into Sorsby, at the chance of winning a NC this year. If you move on, you basically wasted a lot.  This is why Ohio State wants 3 QB's they feel can start. That is why the backups the past 5 years at some point transfer. Texas Tech has no backup near the quality of Sorsby. If they move on, they are screwed for 2026. 
    • Maybe there's something I still don't understand about the situation. Wouldn't Texas Tech do itself a favor to move on from Sorsby at this point?      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.