Jump to content
IGNORED

Fujikure red/gold flightspeed fit-on shafts

proff49

By proff49,
in Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting

 Share
Note: This thread is 5545 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

hrossroth Well Established Member

hrossroth

With this specific shaft Cleveland suggests that the red shaft, with the mid/high flex point, be used by players who have faster swing speeds (generally around 100mph+). For these players, the flex point helps to keep the ball from being launched too high. The gold shaft, for slower swings speeds, will help to get the ball in the air because of the low flex point.

Driver: 4DX T 10.5 Evolver w/ Redboard
Hybrids: G5: 16*, 19*, 22*
Irons: Ping Eye 2 +no+ (5-PW)
Wedges: CG12: 52/10, 56/14, 60/10
Putter: C&L flowneckBall: Z-Star

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cocky_watchman Well Established Member

cocky_watchman

Not sure thats 100% true. I have a red shaft on my launcher 3 wood and golds on my driver and hybrids.

Red in for a lower 'tour' trajectory, gold is for a higher flight. Generally red will be better for stronger faster swingers, but is also for someone who hits the ball too high-my swing is 97mph but I hit a 3 wood very high-thats why I bought it.

ANd it works very well.

Shaft stifness is more strictly on swing speed. having said that if you have a problem with cutting it-dont get a stiff shaft.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

proff49 Established Member

proff49

  • Author
Guess I really need to hit them both before I buy something. Just hate to make a 1-2 hour drive to hit a couple clubs.

My swing speed is also in the mid 90's. Most of the time I don't have any trouble getting my driver up but everything else is usually a line shot. Cutting the ball isn't a problem for me. My normal shot is nice draw. Every now and then it turns into a nasty snap hook that might go 75 yards. I currently have a stiff shaft in my driver and regular shafts in everything else.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CosmosMpower Well Established Member

CosmosMpower

$300+? Are you looking at the new Monster XLS? You could always buy a used XL with the Gold stiff shaft and see if you like it for about $60 as a cheap experiement. The XL is actually still a great club, I can't tell any improvement at all with the XLS (haven't hit the Monster yet).

FYI the gold shaft plays a little weak to flex.

SLDR 430 TP Graphite Design DI-6s
SLDR Mini Driver TP Graphite Design DI-6s
SLDR 4h Matrix Black Tie 95s
Ping G25 4-PW
Ping Gorge 50, 54, 58

Ping Anser IWI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note: This thread is 5545 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.

  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • iacas
      Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?

      By iacas ·

      I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Dr. Manhattan
      Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?

      By Dr. Manhattan ·

      Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
    • iacas
      The Pro Tours Random Thoughts and Musings Thread

      By iacas ·

      Perceptive rules question by caddie unlocks Tour pro’s ‘dead zone’ relief A perceptive rules question by Xander Schauffele’s caddie, Austin Kaiser, unlocked “dead zone” relief during the Wells Fargo Championship.
    • DaveP043
      The Pro Tours Random Thoughts and Musings Thread

      By DaveP043 ·

      I ran across an interesting new clip, Johnson Wagner went into that spot with the Referee who allowed the relief.  Apparently there was a perfectly reasonable shot to be made, as Johnson clearly demonstrated, so relief from the TIO was perfectly appropriate.
    • iacas
      Jack vs. Tiger: Who's the Greatest Golfer?

      By iacas ·

      Once again… it's easier to be "consistent" when you're playing against weaker competition. Despite playing against significantly stronger/deeper fields, Jack was nowhere near as dominant as Tiger Woods was. Jack's "consistency" is a lame way of saying "I like Jack and I want to vote for him as GOAT but I can't come up with a real reason why, so I'll just say he was more 'consistent.'" If someone joined the PGA Tour, kinda muddled around for a year or two, then won 16 majors and 75 total PGA Tour events in eight years, then promptly retired… He'd almost surely have my vote for GOAT. Consistency schmonsistency.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept
The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...