Jump to content
IGNORED

The Ball Isn't the Target


Note: This thread is 4336 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I had a bit of a revelation yesterday at the driving range. I'm sure most players go through this when their swing becomes second nature, and they begin focusing on actually hitting a target more, and less on just trying to not duff the ball. But it made me realize:

A lot of beginning players think that the ball is the target.

The ball is not the only thing we're trying to aim for. And I think that this intense focus on just hitting the ball is a reason why people might have inconsistent ball striking and/or poor accuracy.

Really aiming for a specific target, especially at the driving range helped my iron game immensely.

Captain Obvious to the rescue.. but even though I would've brushed off this tip before with a "duh..," I really started putting it to practice when I realized it myself.

I'd like to hear anyone else's comments or experiences with this idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


At the range I go to...there's a specific tee that has a newer, nice mat and there's a "green" with a pin about 165 yds out directly in front of this tee. I use it as my "target" for every shot I hit. If it's a wedge, I want to see the ball come down in front of the green/pin. If I'm hitting 4i, 3H, 3W or driver... I want to see the ball fly directly over it. Works pretty well for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I just focus on making sure my swing is smooth and in line.. its amazing how "like butter" a hit is when you don't aim to just crush the ball. I love it. I'm definitely a better golfer because of it..no longer afraid of going to the range as well.

What's In My  Stand Bag

 

Driver:  FT-iZ 9*

Hybrids: C3 3,4,5

Irons: C3 6-GW

Wedges: C3 58*/8 and 54*/12

Putter:  blade

Ball: Gamer V2

 

http://cdn.thesandtrap.com/0/0d/150x50px-LL-0d81d772_tst_award_kickstarter_otm.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This may sound crazy to some of you but its been working for me. I am brand new to golf this year and play from the blue tees. Here's what I do... When I set my ball on the tee, I place the wording on the ball directly in line with the pin. Then when looking at the tee the wording is straight in line with it. Then when I go to address the ball with the club I use the taylormade script to make sure I am aligned up straight. Also, I don't try to kill the ball. I have found for me anyways that if I try to hulk smash the ball I just dump the driver I to the ground it top the ball. I don't know if this is the correct way of doing things or not, but my drives got straight. The last round of nine I played I only missed the fairway once and it was not by much. Putting is another issue all together for me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


really depends on what player you are at the time. As with everything there is balance. As a juniro golfer, I was very much a swinger of the club, hitting through the ball and picking it. But for me to make the next level, I needed a little more hit. I worked on an analogy of a nail through a golf ball angles slightly downwards, and tried to hammer it into the ground( only 10 degrees of so) to get the feeling of compression/squeezing the ball. After a while of doing this, I found that balance between making a swing and picking it, and getting a nice downward strike on the ball.

I agree, a lot of guys are pure hitters, trying to much down on it. A lot of good players do this too, as they find it can produce a lower, more penetrating flight. But to suggest that everyone tries to swing thorugh the ball is too much of a generalisation. Find the balance between the two.

Oh, and that feeling of like swinging through nothing - it's not what a professional feels when they strike a ball properly. Sure, there is no vibration when the sweet spot is hit, but to hit the sweetspot with the correct attack angle and loft will feel much heavier at impact than what most people deem a good shot. The excessively 'swinging through air' feeling you are getting is when the loft/angle of attack ratio is not optimum (but you have hit the sweet spot). you are basically losing potential distance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ahh..thanks for the post. I'll have to see if I can get that true feeling.

What's In My  Stand Bag

 

Driver:  FT-iZ 9*

Hybrids: C3 3,4,5

Irons: C3 6-GW

Wedges: C3 58*/8 and 54*/12

Putter:  blade

Ball: Gamer V2

 

http://cdn.thesandtrap.com/0/0d/150x50px-LL-0d81d772_tst_award_kickstarter_otm.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites


My irons all have stainless steel, "stiff," True Temper shafts in them.  They give me great feedback.  When I hit the ball clean and my timing and tempo come together at impact, I feel a buttery flex in the shaft.  When I don't, they feel like stiff, stainless steel shafts that leave a little shock in the hands at impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4336 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Day 135: 5/10/24 Putting and chipping practice. Good session putting through 50 mm gates.
    • Why should SuperSpeed get 3x of Stack's profits? I get the part about SuperSpeed wanting damages sustained as a result of Stack, but I don't get why SuperSpeed feels that they're entitled to both Stack's profits and damages.   Does anyone know/think SuperSpeed actually has a case here?
    • https://static1.squarespace.com/static/603d222df4a6a57df7ef3e29/t/663cdba5d89e3a1848dab8d1/1715264422455/US_DIS_ILND_1_24cv3749_d34676497e293_COMPLAINT_filed_by_SuperSpeed_Golf_LLC_Jury_Demand.pdf The full complaint is there, but  basically, SuperSpeed (SS*) is claiming the Stack System (SS*) Stack System’s [sic] produces inflated metrics later used to, [sic] mislead and deceive consumers. Stack System’s marketing materials inflate apparent swing speed and distance gains through selective presentment of data without qualification that purported gains are not the result, in whole or part, of its training protocol and products. * Yes, I'm joking about abbreviating both "SS." SuperSpeed wants: A judgment that the Stack System has disseminated false and/or misleading information in violation of federal and Illinois law. The deletion of all false advertising distributed and recall of all packaging containing false advertising and a requirement that Stack System issue notices (written or otherwise) to that effect to all current distributors and retailers of its products and all distributors with whom Stack System has done business in the past eighteen months. Written confirmation within 30 days of an injunction detailing the manner and form in which Stack System has complied. An order that Stack System disseminate corrective advertising informing consumers, the trade, and the public of Stack System’s unlawful conduct. 3X all profits received by Stack System as a result of its unlawful actions. 3X all damages sustained by SuperSpeed (as a result of Stack System’s actions) The cost of the action All reasonable attorney fees All other relief to which SuperSpeed are entitled and such other or additional relief as just and proper. Oy.
    • I'm not doing this for the hundred and twentieth time. Sorry in advance, but you get the massively abridged version. Those guys also benefited from the weaker/shallower fields. Also, Watson's career doesn't overlap with Jack's like many think it did. Tom is nearly a decade younger. Jack won only like four majors only after Tom won his first. And Tom won more British Opens than he did all three of the other majors combined, as it was his specialty (not Jack's). Arnie's career similarly doesn't overlap Jack's as much as many think.   Jack would also tell you Tiger was the better golfer.
    • Weaker depth of fields for sure. Some of the top level guys with Jack were pretty awesome. Tom Watson had the lead on the 72nd hole of the 2009 British Open, an event where Tiger missed the cut. Old Tom was almost 60 years old. Jack himself at age 58 finished Top 10 at The 1998 Masters and scored better than Tiger, who won The Masters by 12 shots just a year before that.   The success of both Tom & Jack in older age gives some hope that maybe Tiger can find the magic again at some point. He’s still trying to figure out how to build the stamina for 72 holes after the leg injury. I would love to see him jump on the leaderboard in the coming years. I know a lot of people have given up on him at this point, but that was also true from 2014 to 2017 with the back injuries. He had a hell of a resurgence in 2018 & 2019. Would be fun to see it again. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...