Jump to content
IGNORED

Are There Really Any DIY Clubs That Compare To 59/69's?


Note: This thread is 4290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I know virtually nothing about the DIY club making game, but after pricing new MP-59/69's, I thought I'd ask: Are there really any DIY blades that are truly comparable in quality? I'm speaking with respect to the iron heads, of course. Thought about just picking up a set of 33's on the cheap - I always loved those clubs. Like most ho's, though, I start looking at something that's shiny and new and I'm drawn like a magnet. I'd rather not part with a grand or whatever, so the thought crossed my mind re: building a set. I'm about 95% sure I'm not going to go the DIY route, but someone here with experience might change my mind (or convince me for sure that it was a foolish idea in the first place). Thanks in advance.

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Perhaps check out Golfsmith..look into Wishon, Nakamura.  My buddy made a custom set using Snake Eye forged MC/CB combo with PX 5.0 HL shafts, custom ferrules and grips..but it ends up costing much more than buying a set off the rack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Maverick

Perhaps check out Golfsmith..look into Wishon, Nakamura.  My buddy made a custom set using Snake Eye forged MC/CB combo with PX 5.0 HL shafts, custom ferrules and grips..but it ends up costing much more than buying a set off the rack.

Then he didn't do it right. You shouldn't be paying more for components than a new set... Maltby heads are all around 20-30$, shafts go from 15$ for Dynamic Gold to 35 for Project X and C tapers. Grips run from 5-10$ and ferrules are like 5$ for a dozen.

Should cost in the neighborhood of 40-90$ per club. New sets, even with set pricing, are starting at like 100+ per club, and that's with stock shafts and grips. If you want Project Xs and multicompound grips in them, you'll shell out a couple hundred bucks on top of the base price.

1000$>600$

That said, comparing MP heads to most components is tough. Wishon's heads are pretty nice but Mizuno heads are sexier than any component.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You can get a custom set built for under $800 on Ebay.....look closely. A friend of mine ordered from a seller on there and his 69s came back flawless right from the factory. Items from sellers "golfmygirl" and "golf-seller" look pretty solid.

In the bag:

TaylorMade R11 Driver (10.5 stiff stock shaft)

TaylorMade R11 3wood (15 degree stiff stock shaft)

Adams IdeaPro 3i hybrid (20 degree)

Titleist DCI 4-PW (photo)

Cleveland CG15 wedges (52, 56, 60)

Odyssey White-Hot 2-Ball (Superstroke oversize grip)

Bushnell Tour V2 Rangefinder

Ping Hoofer 2012 Bag

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Perhaps check out Golfsmith..look into Wishon, Nakamura.  My buddy made a custom set using Snake Eye forged MC/CB combo with PX 5.0 HL shafts, custom ferrules and grips..but it ends up costing much more than buying a set off the rack.

Ah, my ignorance is starting to show. Thanks for the response. Maybe I should have asked this: - I know there are several brands of DIY club heads. Which (if any), in your opinion, might be comparable or better in quality to something like 59/69's? I'll check out the brands you've mentioned. If I'm going to drop a grand on off the rack clubs (fit for me) but I could spend another $x on something that was measurably better, I'd do that.

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by LovinItAll

I know virtually nothing about the DIY club making game, but after pricing new MP-59/69's, I thought I'd ask:

Are there really any DIY blades that are truly comparable in quality? I'm speaking with respect to the iron heads, of course.

Thought about just picking up a set of 33's on the cheap - I always loved those clubs. Like most ho's, though, I start looking at something that's shiny and new and I'm drawn like a magnet. I'd rather not part with a grand or whatever, so the thought crossed my mind re: building a set. I'm about 95% sure I'm not going to go the DIY route, but someone here with experience might change my mind (or convince me for sure that it was a foolish idea in the first place).

Thanks in advance.

Can you actually hit a golf ball 99% of the time on the sweet spot?  From what (I THINK ?) you said you don't and blades would be foolish.

Wishon - Search for the Perfect Golf Club page 58

"If you are, however, a mere mortal and don't hit it on center 99 percent of the time, then get smart and get a cavity back. I mean, over half of the tour pros use cavity backs,so that should tell you something..."

==============================================

If you are not an expert caliber striker are you loaded with $? From what you said you are not

If blades don't work out then you have $ sitting un-used.  On the other hand blades are fantastic for use on the practice field as they provide instant feedback via the signiture ball flight based on how you hit it.  I cannot justify hundreds of dollars for pretty blades just to kick around for practice. I have a 1963 set of Hogan IPT blades. they are in like new condition due I suppose to guality metalurgy and plating back then. they are pretty but I don't care really as I use Cavities for playing. Although When I do use these on short beginner courses for giggles they are proudly perched in my bag even if they do hit 2 clubs shorter.   I have a Mizuno MP-30 sitting next to me as I type that I tried one day. It lauched 2 balls directly over the tee box on the hole to the right. there are no magical qualities in Mizuno irons. They are like fishing lures. Designed to catch fisherman and not fish.  I agree Mizuno are beauties but the LUST must be tempered with wisdom.  That women may be gorgious but the rest of your live would be hell if you take the bait.

Plan of attack.

1 ) Get a set of cavities to play with

2) get a relatively cheap set of Hogan blades off ebay to fulfil this itch that needs scratching

http://www.google.com/search?q=hogan+irons&hl;=en&rlz;=1T4GZGN_enUS484US484&prmd;=imvnsfd&tbm;=isch&tbo;=u&source;=univ&sa;=X&ei;=o9EbUOqXE6rD0QH2pIHgDA&ved;=0CF8QsAQ&biw;=1441&bih;=621

======

You can buy older top of the line modles used much cheaper than building new component stuff.   Golf clubs are like cameras, TV's etc. People read magazines and stuff and are convinced that last years model has been rendered completely obsolete by this years. They simply cannot be seen with last years and they sell it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Can you actually hit a golf ball 99% of the time on the sweet spot?  From what (I THINK ?) you said you don't and blades would be foolish.

I hit the ball well enough to play blades. I played 33's for years and consistently kept my index between 2-3 with periodic revisions at scratch. I stated playing twice/week and my index increased to 7-8. I purchased CB clubs at that time, but the switch didn't make any difference in my ball striking. I ended up selling the 33's and keeping the CB's (a mistake) more because of the money I'd spent on the new clubs and the age of the 33's than any benefit the CB's added to my game. Really, the jump in my HC at the time was due to poorer driving and a not as crisp short game from playing/practicing less than it was to my ball striking. I was trying to buy game, but really, I knew better. All of that was years ago. Today, I consistently shoot in the 70's, and again, it isn't typically my ball striking with irons that keeps me from shaving strokes off of my index. I'm older and need softer shafts, too, and the clubs I have could be refitted and would work just fine. I don't think my index will be affected either way (buying new clubs or not) but I just don't like the clubs I'm playing now (never have, really). It's more aesthetics than anything else, and we could talk all day about how a fool and his money are soon parted. [quote] Wishon - Search for the Perfect Golf Club page 58 [[/quote] I checked out the Wishon site. Excellent info - thanks. [quote] "If you are, however, a mere mortal and don't hit it on center 99 percent of the time, then get smart and get a cavity back. I mean, over half of the tour pros use cavity backs,so that should tell you something..." [/quote] I hear ya. I have opinions about this, but it would be moving off-topic. I appreciate the comments. [quote] If you are not an expert caliber striker are you loaded with $? From what you said you are not [/quote] It really isn't about the money. I'm a craftsman of sorts, so the idea of building a set of irons has some appeal. Also, why pay for a manufacture's advertising, overhead, etc. if there are better products available that might still save some scratch? I'm not saying there are, hence my OP. As I said originally, I'm most inclined to purchase a major brand, whether it's new or used. [quote] You can buy older top of the line modles used much cheaper than building new component stuff.   Golf clubs are like cameras, TV's etc. People read magazines and stuff and are convinced that last years model has been rendered completely obsolete by this years. They simply cannot be seen with last years and they sell it. [/quote] Couldn't agree more, that's why I said I was considering purchasing a used set of 33's. If money was really an issue, I probably wouldn't play golf, but that's another topic. I play or practice almost every day again, and I want to love my golf clubs when I set up for a shot. Right now, I don't. That's all it boils down to, really.

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I play the MP 68, and in my humble opinion, you will not find a DIY club head that meets, let alone exceeds, the quality, feel, and playability of a Mizuno.  I've hit some of the DIY club heads and could not find one that came close to a Mizuno.

Craig 

Yeah, wanna make 14 dollars the hard way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is sort of the catch 22 with diy clubs, I suppose.  You can't try them until you build them, and don't know what to build until you try them.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by dsc123

This is sort of the catch 22 with diy clubs, I suppose.  You can't try them until you build them, and don't know what to build until you try them.

This was a part of the problem I was facing. I've decided to order 69's (still deciding on shafts), so thanks to everyone for responding.

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by LovinItAll

This was a part of the problem I was facing. I've decided to order 69's (still deciding on shafts), so thanks to everyone for responding.

That's a fine choice and I wish you the best. Just don't pretend you're saving any money.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

That's a fine choice and I wish you the best. Just don't pretend you're saving any money.

I don't understand. Why would I pretend I'm saving any money? I already said that I think going with a big, commercial brand might cost more money, not less.

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by LovinItAll

I don't understand. Why would I pretend I'm saving any money? I already said that I think going with a big, commercial brand might cost more money, not less.

It had been suggested by others (Maverick) that going the component route was more expensive than buying a full set. I just want to assure you and anyone else it's not the case. I wasn't trying to be negative, MP69s are a good choice if you decided you're willing to spend decent money.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

It had been suggested by others (Maverick) that going the component route was more expensive than buying a full set. I just want to assure you and anyone else it's not the case. I wasn't trying to be negative, MP69s are a good choice if you decided you're willing to spend decent money.

Got it. I always expected that going the component route would be less money unless there was some exotic clubhead I'd never run across. My guess is that a high quality head would be just as good (maybe better) as a Mizuno head, but I decided I just didn't want to mess with it. I've got a shop with two unfinished projects in it right now. All I need is my wife reminding me how she's ready for her dining room table to be finished while I work on something else.

  • Upvote 1

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 4290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Yea it is. A gave my brother a set of cobra irons at least a decade old and he walked away with 29 dollars worth of skin money the other day. 
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...