Jump to content
IGNORED

Mizuno MP-H4 3 Iron - Mini Review


Note: This thread is 4026 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Long story short, I can't get on with typical hybrids at all. I have two Nike SQ hybrids that I've never had confidence in and played two 9 hole rounds with a smaller Titlest 910 21 degree that someone let me demo. I didn't like any of them...at all.

So, I decided to order a MP-H4 3 iron. I currently play the MX-200's in 4-GW. I ditched the 4 and 5 irons for two years, but recently put them in the bag again and have been hitting them pretty well. That inspired me to step up to the MP-H4 3 iron to replace the Nike 4 hybrid. Keep in mind, I'm a 17 hdcp (hopefully on the way down) and I haven't had a 3 iron forever (not that I could hit it then).

My first impressions were that the club looks great and has a slightly smaller head than my MX-200's. I have to admit the looking at the smaller head while I was still at work had me slightly worried. The thicker sole restored some confidence though.

After work, I went straight to the range to try it out. I hit some 9 irons to warm, a few 5 irons and then pulled the MP-H4. With the first few practice swings, it felt very balanced. The hybrid / hollow design felt nice and smooth. Also, I noticed it was the same length as my MX-200 5 iron. I expected it to be longer, but it wasn't. My MX-200's were bought off the shelf and this was ordered custom from Mizuno with standard length / lie (I'm 5'11"). Maybe someone can comment on that.

In short, this club felt amazing. Amazing! As mentioned I'm a 17 and haven't had a 3 iron forever. It had a mid trajectory and wasn't hard to hit at all. This was just what I was looking for in a hybrid club. You can feel the hollow aspect of the club and the sound is a bit more clicky and higher pitched than the MX-200's. I did hit a few off the toe, but the result wasn't any different than a toe shot with any of my other irons.

I got this club fitted with a TT Dynalite Gold XP to match my MX-200's, plus I really like these shafts. So, if you don't like most of the hybrid offerings out there and want something that's a long iron replacement with more forgiveness, I'd take a long look at these clubs. I think Mizuno really nailed it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'm with you.    I've tried ad nauseum and just can't commit to hybrids.    I wanted a cavity back 3 iron, so I ordered a TM Rocketbladez 3 iron.    It's magnificent off the tee - absolutely love hitting it for when it's too tight for me to hit driver.     Carries far longer than my previous 3 iron.     Sounds great too.    Off the deck, I'm not as confident with it yet - never ever sliced an iron before like I do with this 3 iron (always hook irons) - so thats something I have to figure out that seems peculiar to this club.    A pure 3 iron off the tee is the best feeling in golf ...

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4026 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Last year I made an excel that can easily measure with my own SG data the average score for each club of the tee. Even the difference in score if you aim more left or right with the same club. I like it because it can be tweaked to account for different kind of rough, trees, hazards, greens etc.     As an example, On Par 5's that you have fescue on both sides were you can count them as a water hazard (penalty or punch out sideways), unless 3 wood or hybrid lands in a wider area between the fescue you should always hit driver. With a shorter club you are going to hit a couple less balls in the fescue than driver but you are not going to offset the fact that 100% of the shots are going to be played 30 or more yards longer. Here is a 560 par 5. Driver distance 280 yards total, 3 wood 250, hybrid 220. Distance between fescue is 30 yards (pretty tight). Dispersion for Driver is 62 yards. 56 for 3 wood and 49 for hybrid. Aiming of course at the middle of the fairway (20 yards wide) with driver you are going to hit 34% of balls on the fescue (17% left/17% right). 48% to the fairway and the rest to the rough.  The average score is going to be around 5.14. Looking at the result with 3 wood and hybrid you are going to hit less balls in the fescue but because of having longer 2nd shots you are going to score slightly worst. 5.17 and 5.25 respectively.    Things changes when the fescue is taller and you are probably going to loose the ball so changing the penalty of hitting there playing a 3 wood or hybrid gives a better score in the hole.  Off course 30 yards between penalty hazards is way to small. You normally have 60 or more, in that cases the score is going to be more close to 5 and been the Driver the weapon of choice.  The point is to see that no matter how tight the hole is, depending on the hole sometimes Driver is the play and sometimes 6 irons is the play. Is easy to see that on easy holes, but holes like this:  you need to crunch the numbers to find the best strategy.     
    • Very much so. I think the intimidation factor that a lot of people feel playing against someone who's actually very good is significant. I know that Winged Foot pride themselves on the strength of the club. I think they have something like 40-50 players who are plus something. Club championships there are pretty competitive. Can't imagine Oakmont isn't similar. The more I think about this, the more likely it seems that this club is legit. Winning also breeds confidence and I'm sure the other clubs when they play this one are expecting to lose - that can easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    • Ah ok I misunderstood. But you did bring to light an oversight on my part.
    • I was agreeing with you/jumping off from there.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...