Jump to content
IGNORED

Taylormade Burners, Burner 2.0's or Burner Plus irons?


Note: This thread is 3904 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. This is my first post to the site so please bare with me. So I'm looking at purchasing some new irons and I've narrowed the selection down to the Taylor made Burner line. I've hit the 2009 burner 1.0 and they felt fantastic. Long, straight and lots of elevation. But I've also heard that the other Burner irons are also very good. I haven't hit them but I'm interested. I just want an iron that can give me consistent shots cause I'm playing some old crappy Wilson blades right now that are not the easiest to hit. Money is not really an issue but if there are only slight differences between the three, I would rather take the cheapest. Thanks for any responses!
Link to comment
Share on other sites


What's stopping you from looking at the RBZ line of clubs? The RBZ irons are red-hot and I prefer the shape of the driver head on the RBZ to the Burner. All personal preference, of course but you could probably get a good price on some RBZ irons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I had the 09 burners and really liked them.  I don't know what the difference is with the 2.0's but the plus have a big offset that may or may not fit your eye.

You can get the 09 burners for $225 or so on ebay.  If you interested in a used set, PM me.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...

You've probably already made the purchase, but I just bought a set of Burner Plus irons a month or so ago.  I hit the 2.0's and was not a fan.  The Burner Plus have larger heads and in my opinion are much easier to hit.  Perhaps a more skilled player would see the value in the 2.0 line, but for my money, Burner Plus is as good as it gets.  They've added yardage to each of my iron shots, which was consistent with all the reviews I read.  Best of luck mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3904 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I honestly believe if they play longer tees by 300-400 yards, closer to or over 7,000 yards, more rough, tougher greens, women's golf will become much more gripping.  BTW, if it weren't for Scottie killing it right now, men's golf isn't exactly compelling.
    • Day 542, April 26, 2024 A lesson no-show, no-called (he had the wrong time even though the last text was confirming the time… 😛), so I used 45 minutes or so of that time to get some good work in.
    • Yeah, that. It stands out… because it's so rare. And interest in Caitlin Clark will likely result in a very small bump to the WNBA or something… and then it will go back down to very low viewership numbers. Like it's always had. A small portion, yep. It doesn't help that she lost, either. Girls often don't even want to watch women playing sports. My daughter golfs… I watch more LPGA Tour golf than she does, and it's not even close. I watch more LPGA Tour golf than PGA Tour golf, even. She watches very little of either. It's just the way it is. Yes, it's a bit of a vicious cycle, but… how do you break it? If you invest a ton of money into broadcasting an LPGA Tour event, the same coverage you'd spend on a men's event… you'll lose a ton of money. It'd take decades to build up the interest. Even with interest in the PGA Tour declining.
    • Oh yea, now I remember reading about you on TMZ!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...