or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

3 and 5 wood

post #1 of 6
Thread Starter 
Should your 3 and 5 wood be the same or is it just preference with each club?
post #2 of 6
Well, you are a 6 so I feel kinda funny giving advice, but here goes. I think it depends on what you are trying to do with the 5, what your distances are, how you play(do you prefer to hit full shots all the time, etc) and what the rest of your bag looks like. I think some folks look at the 5 wood as a shorter range 3 wood and use it like that. Stay short of trouble or straighter off the tee etc. In that case I think it would be beneficial to have at least a similar shaft to your three wood and maybe the same make of head so that if you swing them the same, they feel the same but just cover different distances. Others might look at the 5 wood as more of a trouble or specialty club, and in this case I think it would matter less that it matches the 3 wood; it would be more important to have a shaft and head design for what you are trying to do with this club. Also playing into the decision would be what if any hybrids you carry.
post #3 of 6
Originally Posted by Mack H View Post

Should your 3 and 5 wood be the same or is it just preference with each club?


It depends on player preferences. The same model and shaft for a 3W and 5W lends to consistency of feel, and set-up.


For better players, the differing models and/or shafts may be a way to get different things out of different clubs; not necessarily using the clubs as a "team."


Also, you may see casual/beginning players who piece together their sets - just find a club that works and add it in the bag.


From 1982-2008, I played matching heads and shafts in persimmon-headed D, 3 and 4 of MacGregor MTs; then component FWs; and later Tour Edge Bazooka 3W and 5W.


Then I had Callaway X Tour 3W (R.flex) until 2012, paired with an odd assortment of Hs and FWs.


Then I went to matching RBZ 3W.HL and 7W (dumped after one season), and now have Tour Edge Exotics XRail 4W and 7W, very happy with this matched set! Best FW pairing since the Bazookas.


A quick look at GD's What's In My Bag (Golf Digest online). Thompson has matching shafts, and Watney has matching everything. H and P, very creative.


 Player  Long FW + Shaft  Next Long Club + Shaft
 Russell Henley

 Nike SQ Sumo 3W 13*

 - Mitsu Rayon Diamana Blue Board

Nike VR.Pro H 18*

 - Mitsu Rayon Fubuki

 Michael Thompson

 Ping G25 3W 15*

 - Grafalloy ProLaunch Red, X.Flex

 Akira M117 5W 18*

 -  Gr. ProLaunch Red, X.Flex

 Nick Watney

 Nike VR_Covert Tour 3W 14*

 - Graphite Design BB-8X

 Nike VR_Covert Tour 5W 18*
 - Graphite Design BB-8X
 Carl Pettersson

 RBZ 3W 14.5*

 - ???

 Nike VR Pro Limited Ed 19*

 - ???


Others: Scott Stallings and Gary Woodland carry a single FW (3W) and no Hs, and Charlie Beljan carries all irons and wedges except for a putter and Driver.

post #4 of 6
I have matching 3&5 fairway woods, same shafts and make, the 5w being an inch shorter at 42", i think it helps with consistency, i can hit them both as badly as each other! a2_wink.gif
post #5 of 6
Thread Starter 
Would a 2 hybrid be more beneficial then a 5 wood I do have a 3 hybrid?
post #6 of 6

A couple of years ago, I hit Callaway and Adams hybrids at a demo day. The mfgr reps from both companies discouraged mid-HDCP golfers form loading up 2Hs. They said you needed a lot of clubhead speed to be able to get a 16* or 17* H out of the rough.


Also, most companies only make the 2H in the Tour or Pro models.


Mack, as a 3.5 HDCP, it depends on what works for you. If you have a 3W and one hybrid, you might want one with a bigger margin of error.


But, what do I know? I did an online fitting for Ping, and got this suggested mix for long clubs:

  • Ping G20 5W (18*)
  • Ping G20 2H (17*) and 3H (20*)


Final verdict: If you feel at all iffy about a 2H, go with a 3H. If you have any distance concerns, go with a 5W if you can hit it.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Clubs, Grips, Shafts, Fitting