Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
  • entries
    19
  • comments
    53
  • views
    6,167

Recent Hot Streak Part 1

phillyk

575 views

I haven't really written a lot about my golf this season, so I'll talk about recent tournament rounds, that I can remember, including some in the Newport Cup.

Part 1 will cover before Cup events.  Part 2 will be Cup stuff.  Just separating my thoughts a bit.

I don't remember when I first started the swing thoughts I have now, but I've been working with them for a few months now and it really seems to make my game consistently better and better.  In my pre-shot routine, I start with my creating my grip with the club just behind the ball.  I like to make sure my left thump is pointing down the shaft with my left wrist parallel with the face (at least what feels parallel with the face).  Then I create my stance that feels slightly open.  If my stance gets into a position of aiming right, I'll have no chance to hit my intended target.  I like to feel more weight on my left side than what is normal because it helps start the back swing. 

Before takeaway, my objective is to make sure that if I were to swing, where would the ball go?  If it is not at my intended target, I'll adjust.  Those who played with me recently at the Cup probably noticed that I do a dance with my feet before swinging.  I do it to make sure I feel aimed at my target and am good to go.  If it feels way off, then I'll step away from the ball and start the whole routine over again.  In the swing, I only have one thought with irons and two thoughts with my driver and fairway wood.  With irons, it's to make sure I feel my left wrist being flat at the top of my swing. This will insure the face, for me, is squared at impact and that I finished the turn on my back swing, to start the in to out path on the down swing.  With driver, I have the same thought as above but with the added thought that I want to watch the club head's blur go through the ball.  Reason is because it will slow my aggressive swing down a bit and relax myself enough to make sure contact is good.  With my fairway wood, the added thought is to feel like I'm swinging up on the ball.  I know this isn't "right" for how you're suppose to do it, but if I think swing up on it, I usually come into the ball flat versus hitting down with it too much.

My biggest fault, recently, has been short game.  More specifically, the shots between 45yds and 65yds.  It's more than a easy pitch and less than a full swing, and I get super flippy and start skulling the darn ball.  But, at the range for 5 minutes during the Cup, I decided to really grind it out and figure something out.  I know that I needed to get my hands ahead of the ball and have them stay there.  So, I got I figured it out.  Hands ahead take the club back to a half swing or so and go through and it worked.  So that really helped me come out shooting darts for the 2nd and 3rd days of the Cup.

Before this trip, I had major issues, but because my long game and putting was on point, I made up for the losses.  It's really annoying to say that.  To go out there and have 4 - 5 birdies a round, but because you chunked/skulled 2 or 3 pitches in that zone, you shot even or one over.

Before the Cup, I played in my PGA chapter's Fall Fling.  It's 3 pro ams at 3 different courses, but all close to each other.  I had the same team for the first two days and a different team for the third day.  The first day was at a course I liked and was really ready to go low.  At the first hole, it is cold and raining, so I had an extra layer on.  Felt tight and i hooked my 3 iron into the drink, getting a double bogey.  I had one other double bogey because of a skulled pitch in my no good zone.  Thing is, I hit a long ball off the tee and yeah I'd rather have a 55yd shot than a 90yd one, because you should be closer on average.  But it simply wasn't the case for a while because of how bad I was from 55yds. But I kept trying to get it down.  I think I finished with a 76 that day.

The next day was a good day, finally.  It is a pretty open course off the tee, and lots of driver-wedge opportunities.  Not as many in my no good zone, but more between 75yds and 100yds, which is my very good zone.  I don't remember how many greens in regulation I had, but it was close to 15 or 16.  I made 5 birdies, 3 of which were from getting on in 2 on a short par 5 and 2 putting, and I had two other decent holes that I managed to sink a putt on.  I kid you not, I had at least 10-12 putts from 5-20ft for birdies/eagles and I missed every single one them, save for 1.  I breezed by the hole within an inch or sat on the lip on all of them.  I was putting well, but nothing would drop. I did have one bad hole, because i got sloppy on my routine and sliced the bejesus out of it OB.  So got a double on the easiest hole on the course.  STUPID.  BUT, I shot my first 60's tournament round of 69 (-3).  Of course, I had to think about all those barely missed putts and the stupid double, and to talk about how much better it could've been.

On the 3rd day, we played a course that was my home course for a year, a little while ago.  But I still know the course very well.  After a 69, I was pumped to go low again.  I hit the ball well enough but my approach shots got wary and I had several no good zone shots that sucked again.  I don't remember too much of the round, but I still shot a 73 (+1).  A course like that, I feel like I should be shooting in the 60's pretty consistently.  It was just an off day, I guess, although a 73 is still a decent score.

The 2nd and 3rd days, I managed to pull a T-5th gross place to earn a few player of the year points.  The winner the 2nd day was at -7 and the winner the 3rd day was at -3.

Oh yeah, halfway through my round on the 3rd day, I noticed my driver had a nice crack in the face, but I still hit it decently enough. Luckily my G400 was already in the mail and I got it before heading to North Carolina.



0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Blog Entries

  • Posts

    • Day 71, December 16 Range work today. Warmed up with priority piece drills, the gathered some MEVO data. Finished with partial wedge shots. 
    • Not really the topic for it, but group lessons can be good in that they lower the pressure, but the obvious "bad" parts are that the individuals don't get the same amount of attention as they would get individually. Adults often do them because they're cheaper, they can do them with friends, and they are less pressure. Kids often do them because they're good babysitting. That's not the point I was making at all. My point was that beginning golfers don't get to face a "beginner" opponent - the golf course and the equipment is pretty much pro-level right from the start. Beginners in cricket would not fare very well nor would they develop any good habits at all if they faced professional cricket bowlers right from the start, but unfortunately that's basically what happens in golf - they're given a golf ball, a driver, and a hole that's 4.25" away. About the only concession we make as "golf" is to sometimes tee them up 150 yards away instead of 450 yards away, but the actual act is still incredibly difficult, with virtually no margin for error. Cricket and virtually all other sports: Have a simpler motion with shorter implements at slower speeds. Have more margin for error. Are played against other human beings, who can make mistakes and who are, particularly when someone is starting out, often at about the same level. Golf: Has a complex motion with longer implements swung at higher speeds. Have virtually no margin for error. Is played right away to a 4.25" hole 150+ yards away. 🤦‍♂️ I think you've completely missed the context, not to mention the bit about meaning no offense. Being happy to shoot a 92 doesn't mean you're a bad person, your handicap is not a value judgment of any kind. Hell, half of my students probably started with me when they were at your level or worse. It's not a value judgment of any kind. But it does shed some light on your perspective here. It does lend weight to how strongly others might wish to weigh your opinions. Imagine if this was a court of law, and you were called to the stand as an expert witness. What insights could you offer into what it takes to play golf at a high level? Have you been a single digit golfer within the last 20 years? Ever? Have you been a 3, with a small but annoying miss, that required a few months to iron out? Something you couldn't see with the naked eye, that maybe required the use of a little technology to see or measure? I don't know the answer to these things. I guessed at your age based on the year in your email address. For all I know you're 88 and you were married in 1967, and so shooting 92 right now is pretty good, but back in the day you maintained a +1 handicap. I don't know. That would certainly give a bit more weight to your opinion, wouldn't you agree? Think about how this looks from my perspective. You're a 22 handicapper, and I'm a +1 and a pretty good instructor. You're posting here telling me (and others) a bunch of stuff about what makes for a good lesson and how people truly get "good" at golf. If I am right about the 51/22 stuff… (and tell me if I've gotten it wrong, please), imagine walking into an auto body shop having flipped through the pages of Car Mechanic magazine and telling the guys who worked there all about what's wrong with the auto body industry. Or talking to a bunch of Fortune 500 CEOs about how they should run their businesses because you took a few college business classes. Your opinions might be weighed a bit - outsider perspective is by its very nature often "fresh" and different - but most likely, what you don't know would limit the applicability and merits of your position/opinion. (And trust me, man, I hate bad instruction more than you probably do, and I would agree that there's a ton of it out there.) Because, like in my golf lessons, I like to tailor whatever I'm saying to the audience, to the person I'm talking to. Admittedly here I'm talking to a few people, anyone who might read this, but I'm also trying to understand where you're coming from, and I'm talking at least a little more to you than the others who might read it. You want to know how someone else put it? That's how someone else put it. And your reaction to my questions above, which again, man I trademarked the phrase "Golf is Hard®" - it is, I get it… anyway, your reaction to that doesn't dissuade me from agreeing with my friend here. What are your qualifications for telling us what a "good lesson" is? What are your qualifications for telling us what it takes to be "good" at golf? That's not to say you need a sparkling résumé for each of those. If you've taken lessons at all, from anyone, you will have opinions on what makes for a good lesson and a bad lesson. And that feedback and those opinions are welcome; I welcome feedback from all corners, from anyone who has something to say, new or old, rich or poor, +6 to 36 handicap… etc. But understanding where you're coming from helps us to understand the context of your opinion. If I'm right about the 51/22 stuff… maybe we're not that far off here. In other words: If I got the 51/22 stuff wrong, then please correct me. Please share some background info so that others know where you're coming from, and what your perspective might be. Being a bad golfer isn't a value judgment. I teach bad golfers. I don't think they're "bad people." The game is ridiculously hard. The first chapter in LSW says that an alien would probably imagine it would take 30 shots to get the ball in the hole, and we're ticked about doing it in 5 or 6. You skipped over all the actual content of my post because you chose to be offended by something that I took the time to write out a few times that was not written or intended to offend at all.
    • I’ve seen plenty of professionals in Cricket draw a “duck” (Bowled out on the first ball with no runs more or less).  It’s not an easy game. In fact it’s a very difficult game. Fast balls arrive at nearly 100 mph, often with an unpredictable bounce, deliberately delivered long and short of the wicket to vary the height on arrival at the batsman.  Spin bowlers can deliver the ball at 70-80 mph but deliver the ball so that it dramatically changes direction directly in front of the batsman after the bounce.  The change in direction happens in roughly 1/10th of a second after the bounce.  Add to that the impact of changing wicket conditions which makes a massive difference to how the ball performs.  Make no mistake cricketers are amazing athletes and the game requires very quick reflexes and excellent hand-eye coordination.  You could debate whether or not it’s easier or harder than golf I think.  Ok pal I won’t waste anymore of your time. Take it easy.
    • For me football is the most interesting sport to watch.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. CT207
      CT207
      (66 years old)
×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...