Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1262 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sportsbox is a startup using computer vision pose estimation to do AI swing coaching. Along the lines of using modern 3D pose estimation to get something like a GEARS golf experience just from your phone and a tripod, with automated coaching built on top of the poses. Things like this:I signed up but they got enough interest they limited their beta to golf coaches. I'm interested as a player but also professionally.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Whoops. Messed up the first one...

Sportsbox is a startup using computer vision pose estimation to do AI swing coaching. Along the lines of using modern 3D pose estimation to get something like a GEARS golf experience just from your phone and a tripod, with automated coaching built on top of the poses. Things like this:

https://www.instagram.com/p/COyrH7UHbRQ/embed/?autoplay=1

sportsbox_ai_face_on.png   sportsbox_ai_turn_pct.png

I signed up but they got enough interest they limited their beta to golf coaches. I'm interested as a player but also professionally. Anyone in their beta? How's the product!?

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I'm on the list and have talked to a few people involved with the beta. They're happy, and for what it will cost, it's pretty amazing. It's not anything close to GEARS, but it's kinda like the Mevo is to a full on FlightScope X3.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 minutes ago, iacas said:

I'm on the list and have talked to a few people involved with the beta. They're happy, and for what it will cost, it's pretty amazing. It's not anything close to GEARS, but it's kinda like the Mevo is to a full on FlightScope X3.

Makes sense. Thanks Erik! Not anything close in terms of accuracy of pose estimation versus motion capture? Or other features/capabilities?

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Just now, mdl said:

Makes sense. Thanks Erik! Not anything close in terms of accuracy of pose estimation versus motion capture? Or other features/capabilities?

Not close in anything. But it's going to be an app, so… I'm not saying something that shouldn't be a surprise. Not close in:

  • the sheer number of things that can be measured
  • accuracy
  • price

🙂

BTW I should be in the beta in early November.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, iacas said:

Not close in anything. But it's going to be an app, so… I'm not saying something that shouldn't be a surprise. Not close in:

  • the sheer number of things that can be measured
  • accuracy
  • price

🙂

BTW I should be in the beta in early November.

Would love to hear your thoughts when you start using it.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

@iacas bump. I talked with their CEO the other day. Still need deeper exploration but just from the few examples that have bubbled up to her it sounds like they've done a great job learning from cutting edge 3D pose estimation research and developing their proprietary algorithm. Most impressive number was their trail arm angle estimate at A4, where it's often totally hidden in FO. Her claim was it's right on the majority of the time and otherwise within 1-2˚ of estimates from motion capture or electromagnetic. Interested to hear how that lines up with your experience.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
6 hours ago, mdl said:

@iacas bump. I talked with their CEO the other day. Still need deeper exploration but just from the few examples that have bubbled up to her it sounds like they've done a great job learning from cutting edge 3D pose estimation research and developing their proprietary algorithm. Most impressive number was their trail arm angle estimate at A4, where it's often totally hidden in FO. Her claim was it's right on the majority of the time and otherwise within 1-2˚ of estimates from motion capture or electromagnetic. Interested to hear how that lines up with your experience.

I don't have any experience with it. I'm not going to pay for it, and I'm not interested in starting a trial.

I'd be surprised if it was anywhere near that accurate. It's an incredibly difficult thing to do, and people have different sized bodies and parts, different sized clothing, etc. They'll be filming from some not-so-perfect angles… etc.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 7 months later...
Posted
On 12/16/2021 at 11:47 PM, iacas said:

I don't have any experience with it. I'm not going to pay for it, and I'm not interested in starting a trial.

I'd be surprised if it was anywhere near that accurate. It's an incredibly difficult thing to do, and people have different sized bodies and parts, different sized clothing, etc. They'll be filming from some not-so-perfect angles… etc.

Sorry to bump an old thread, but Dr Phil Cheetham and some other famous names seem to be actively investing in this AI technology. 

I'm still unsure how it all works using 2D video to convert into 3D.  Is it a best estimate of kinematic data measurements?

I've been viewing some of the you-tube videos and I think that Sportsbox are using Dr Phil Cheetham's 3D data that he has on tour players.  Could it be that they compare the golfer body segment measurements to a 'closest match' of a tour player and somehow plot the differences in body segment positions (over time) to determine the golfer's kinematic data?  Then create a best estimate of other kinematic data (not shown in 2D) by using the 3D information of the tour pro?

Hobby is studying golf biomechanics (especially the kinetics) . No official handicap and play only 7-8  times a year for fun scoring between 81-85 . Don't practice and just use external focus cues to swing with a general appreciation of the physics involved. My favourite golf scientists are Dave Tutelman and Dr Sasho Mackenzie.


  • Administrator
Posted

Those sound like the kind of questions you should ask them.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, Warlock said:

Sorry to bump an old thread, but Dr Phil Cheetham and some other famous names seem to be actively investing in this AI technology. 

I'm still unsure how it all works using 2D video to convert into 3D.  Is it a best estimate of kinematic data measurements?

I've been viewing some of the you-tube videos and I think that Sportsbox are using Dr Phil Cheetham's 3D data that he has on tour players.  Could it be that they compare the golfer body segment measurements to a 'closest match' of a tour player and somehow plot the differences in body segment positions (over time) to determine the golfer's kinematic data?  Then create a best estimate of other kinematic data (not shown in 2D) by using the 3D information of the tour pro?

I'd been wondering when we would see something like this for golf. The pace this type of machine learning is moving is incredible, and it can do things that are sometimes hard to believe.

I would bet that they film golf swings, similar to the way an end user would do it , but use a system similar to gears as the validation data to train some kind of deep learning algorithm to convert the input video into the body segments. What a time to be alive.

  • Like 1

:whistle:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1262 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.