Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Putting - Swinging vs. Hitting


Note: This thread is 806 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently read an article on Substack by Bruce Rearick, Bargolf on several forums, regarding finding the proper way to make a putt. Bruce suggested using a dry erase marker and make a spot on your ball.  

Then hit putts as if you were driving a nail into the back of the ball gradually adding distance and note where the marks are on your putter. This is a hitting stroke. Then take practice swings without a ball with your eyes close to take the hit out of your stroke. Once comfortable with this method add the ball and check your strike pattern. Direction does not matter. The goal is to identify which stroke has a tighter impact pattern.

As a lifelong swinger I was startled to discover my impact pattern was much tighter with a hit stroke. I use the Stack Putting app and only gained strokes once vs. a tour player with my swing stroke. My last two times putting with a hit stroke I have gained .02 (on Friday) and .21 tonight.  As a 7-handicapper I was very happy. The first time I used a center shafted putter and my miss tendency was left.  With a plumber’s neck tonight, my miss was to the right.

In practice I have had a tendency to miss long, but make the comebacker. I have putted great with tonight’s putter for several rounds back in August, but yips returned and I had to revert back to the claw, where my results were not as good. This putter feels a little heavy, which may have caused the right miss, along with the additional toe hang. I am eager to see if I can take this method, and results, to the course.

Any confusion regarding Bruce’s instructions would be my paraphrasing. He does a great job on his Substack.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

A link would help, but also… I'm not really a fan of a "hit" in the putting stroke, and think that if you ask most people to "hit" it, they'll get some pretty bad results.

Also, impact location isn't super important. It takes a fairly big miss for the ball speed to change a bit.

I like Bruce, but I'd need more info on this one before I could really give a full opinion. The above is just based on your summary.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Finding your stroke!

Hopefully, others can access this link. My curiosity pushed me to at least attempt a hit stroke. The next lesson helps you put that stroke on play. Something, admittedly, I did not do in my initial attempt on the green.


Developing a "Strategic Phylosophy"

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think hitting is good for short putting, focusing on face control, and swinging is good for lag putts focusing on speed. I hit inside 15 feet, I swing outside 15 feet. 

I agree with the fact that center face consistency is not that important unless you are way off center.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 hours ago, p1n9183 said:

I think hitting is good for short putting, focusing on face control, and swinging is good for lag putts focusing on speed. I hit inside 15 feet, I swing outside 15 feet. 

I agree with the fact that center face consistency is not that important unless you are way off center.  

Bruce mentioned that Tiger does both methods, but has a lifetime of practice to do so. You are a much better player than I am. For my handicap, I have underperformed on the greens, regularly falling in the last quartile for my handicap since developing the yips about 6 years ago. The claw helped but I don’t make as many putts.  That said, I practice well. I am eager to see how I do on the course when I care about the outcome.

My experience with off center strikes is that I tend to miss short and distance control becomes an issue.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I've referred people to @Bruce Rearick and will continue to do so, but here are my thoughts as I read these articles (19 through 23).

Quote

Some players perform best when they swing the putter through the ball. Others have a hit instinct. Are you Arnold Palmer or Loren Roberts? Mr. Palmer used the thought of driving a nail into the back of the ball. Putter square to the nail. Loren Roberts had a flow in his stroke. No extra effort anywhere. Which one suits you? The only way to know is to try both. 

Putters were super wristy back then, too. But greens were much slower, and the depth of competition is better, and we know and have learned a lot more. Saying that someone who is now dead from old age did something isn't a very good argument.

That doesn't mean the idea is wrong, it just means I don't take the Arnie thing as support.

Quote

Set up to a putt, then swing the putter with your eyes closed.

What? I get what he's saying with the next part of the post, but that's not how we putt, and my contact suffers (I swing the putter head) if I close my eyes when putting. Why don't we close our eyes when we hit?

If he's saying to keep your eyes closed only during the "swing it without a ball" part of the thing, then that's probably okay, but he never says to actually putt the ball with your eyes open.

From the next article:

Quote

Pop stroke is a common term used to describe this action.

I wonder if Brandt Sneaker would be classified as a "hitter" because his SAM PuttLab data looks a LOT like mine if you adjust for the tempo of his stroke.

Quote

“Given the choice of a broom or a hammer to roll the ball at a target, which would you chose?”

I'd swing the hammer. A broom sounds like a horrible way to try to roll a ball because the bristles will be pretty ineffective.

Quote

Can you swing the putter slow enough and short enough to control speed on a putt of less than 8 feet?

I can, but I also don't mind if someone's stroke adds a little dash of "hit" on a putt of ≤ 8 feet.

Quote

How big a swing is required to control the distance the ball rolls outside of 8 feet.

Depends on your tempo. Swinging is not purely gravity.

Quote

This is where we see “hitters” struggle. The often develop short backswings that require more effort than they can control to roll the longer putts. Can they match the effort and subsequent speed created with the trail hand required.

I find this to be true pretty frequently.

Quote

The best putters I have ever known or witnessed did some things in common. One of which pertains to our recent discussion. Instead of choosing between swing through or hit the ball, they used both techniques as the circumstances demanded.

One of the notes that stuck with me, and I use it often in my advanced courses, “Hit the short putts and swing at the long ones.” 

Yes.


Now, this could very easily (and possibly even is likely) just be my bias. I prefer to swing the putter head, not hit with it. And I prefer to teach it that way, as I've seen more students be able to control distance by swinging over hitting.

And as we get to in the end… hitting shorter putts is totally fine.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Real life has happened the past few weeks since reading these articles (which I had read years ago, and ignored because I was certain I was a swinger). Illness, funerals, weddings and visiting with my almost 2 year-old grandchild. Given these, I have not had the chance to attempt during a round.

For me, I have had eye-opening success with the pop stroke in practice using the Stack putting module as a measuring stick. In my last session, I gained 1.86 strokes versus a tour player! 
 

I have toned down the wristiness. Initially, if I missed I could roll as much as 7’ by on a downhill 15’ putt on a fast green. Watching as many Snedeker videos as I could find, he doesn’t seem to use as much wrist action as I was. Replicating this has helped. 
 

All that said, I am one of the best imitators I know on the putting green. On the course is a different story, as is maintaining it. I was fitted earlier this year for a plumber’s neck TM Spider GTX using a double reverse overlap grip (as opposed to the claw). I immediately improved my putts/GIR by 10% and started recording rounds just over par. After 4-5 rounds I could feel the yips trying to return, and had to revert to the claw. My putting stats immediately returned to my old levels.

When it comes to playing golf, i am a process-oriented player. When it comes to analysis I am focused on results and improving incrementally each practice session. I am in the lowest (read as worst) quintile for putting in my current handicap rating for both total putts and putts/GIR. IMO, putting improvement represents my quickest method to reaching my goals as a player. GIR is one of the best for my handicap, but i don’t really make anything. I almost never come close to matching my score to 95-2(GIR), and find the model that incorporates putting generally matches my score.
 

All that said, I am eager to try on course. I regularly play at a course with a 155 slope that exposes all my weaknesses as a player, which is generally on the green. I should learn quickly if this method can work for me.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 806 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.