Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Presented (for now) without comment.

  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to AMG Video With Michael Neff
  • Moderator

I watched it and have a few thoughts. 

1) They began and ended with the idea of why GEARs will be around for a while as is versus marker-less 3D, affordable apps. They talked about why to use pro swings to help people get better. They covered a few specific examples like external shoulder rotation and side bend. They responded to comments made about AMG, but the video was mostly about using data, with knowing the SD (standard deviation) and being as specific as possible.

2) I watch and learn about swing and the game as a person wanting to know as much as I can, so that I can help my students. As they said, @iacassays, and I say, we teach feels not data. I want to use as much data as I can to ensure I’m on a good track. But the students don’t see that, unless I’m pointing to something specific.

My students are largely beginner to intermediate golfers which are seniors, juniors and ladies. If I were to categorize further into someone wanting to be somewhat competitive versus not, 80% are not. The other 20% want to move up the chain in men’s club or similar. Most only want to take lessons so far that they have fun and “don’t make a fool of themselves” on the course.

I would love to have GEARs, force plates, swing catalyst, or something similar. But, my customer base, as is, would not support such an investment. Maybe one day.  But, maybe having a cheap marker-less system could be a temporary solution and/or to build into something better.  Even if they are inaccurate to some degree, they could be within the SD of pro swings on a GEARs system. Even if to show me a trend, I still have full ball flight, LMs, and video to support certain data points.

For what technology to use, it all depends on the instructor and the student.

3) The video mentioned that amateur swings can often be more physically demanding than pro swings. One of the main reactions I look for when working on something, is whether it felt easier in the end, physically. They feel less tired after an hour on the range than 30min using their swing before. 

4) External rotation is an interesting topic. So many factors go into whether/how far around we should get our hands at p4. But I like their explanation of shallowing.

Edit: I also should mention, GEARs is expensive. It is unreasonable for me to charge what I think I’d need to, based on my customer base. 

  • Informative 2

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • A 5400 yd course is not that short for gents driving it 160 yards considering the approach shot lengths they are going to be faced with on Par 4s.  Also, for the course you are referring to I estimate the Par 4s have to average longer than 260 yds, because the Par 5s are 800 yds or so, and if there are four Par 3s averaging 130 the total is 1320 yds.  This leaves 4080 yds remaining for 12 Par 4s.  That is an average of 340 per hole. Anyway, if there are super seniors driving it only 160ish and breaking 80 consistently, they must be elite/exceptional in other aspects of their games.  I play a lot of golf with 65-75 yr old seniors on a 5400 yd course.  They all drive it 180-200 or so, but many are slicers and poor iron players.  None can break 80. I am 66 and drive it 200 yds.  My average score is 76.  On that course my average approach shot on Par 4s is 125 yds.  The ten Par 4s average 313 yds.  By that comparison the 160 yd driver of the ball would have 165 left when attempting GIR on those holes.     
    • I don't think you can snag lpga.golf without the actual LPGA having a reasonable claim to it. You can find a ton of articles of things like this, but basically: 5 Domain Name Battles of the Early Web At the dawn of the world wide web, early adopters were scooping up domain names like crazy. Which led to quite a few battles over everything from MTV.com You could buy it, though, and hope the LPGA will give you a thousand bucks for it, or tickets to an event, or something like that. It'd certainly be cheaper than suing you to get it back, even though they'd likely win. As for whether women and golfers can learn that ".golf" is a valid domain, I think that's up to you knowing your audience. My daughter has natalie.golf and I have erik.golf.
    • That's a great spring/summer of trips! I'll be in Pinehurst in March, playing Pinehurst No. 2, No. 10, Tobacco Road, and The Cradle. 
    • April 2025 - Pinehurst, playing Mid Pines and Southern Pines + 3 other courses. Probably Talamore, Mid-South, and one other.  July 2025 - Bandon Dunes, just me and my dad. 
    • Wordle 1,263 5/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Once again, three possible words. My 3rd guess works. 🤬
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...