Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was struggling a bit with distance with my old irons (mizuno jpx irons) so decided to get fit for the Ping G430 irons, ending up with 5-PW in reg ping 2.0 awt blue dot +1/4 inch.

 

Here are my thoughts on these irons after about 30 rounds (mid handicapper):

 

Positives:

-The clubs are definitely significantly longer and when struck fairly centrally produce nice high ball flights. 

 

-I have not noticed a lack of spin and have been holding greens no problem when the iron is struck well.

 

-When struck out the toe (which is usually my miss) I am not noticing a falloff in distance.

 

-The long irons, my 5 iron in particular, is absolutely fantastic off the tee. I use it as a driving iron for placement mainly. 

 

-The irons look and sound very nice, ping have done a great job with hiding the cavity on address. They do not look like super game improvement irons while standing over the ball.

 

Negatives:

-When I looked up the lofts on these new irons they are all just a club longer as far as I can tell, the pitching wedge has 41 degrees of loft which has led to some considerable gapping issues lower down in my bag. Ping do offer a range of wedges in the G430 to combat this but obviously means considerable additional cost.

 

-I have found the clubs lower than 7 iron (8,9,W) to be extremely 'jumpy'. What I mean by this is depending on the lie/strike I am getting really unpredictable results, sometimes the wedge will go 110 yards sometimes it will go 135 yards (left or right). What I am trying to say is the faces are very hot so if you sometimes get a bit quick or jabby with your swing, it causes real problems. I often think I would rather have just fatted it 50 yards and had another shot from the fairway.

 

-To add to this: I have found that I have very little greenside feel with these irons. Previously I would regularly use my 8,9,PW for short game as I found it more reliable than always pulling out a sand wedge, I like a nice controllable lower ball flight which can run towards the pin. I have found that I was not able to get any feel around the green with these as the faces are just too hot.

 

-The cavity inserts (pur tech thingy) on my lower clubs 9,W have been scratched and I think this was from being in the same pocket in my carry bag. I would consider head covers if you buy these. 

 

General thoughts / conclusion:

To be honest I am having some serious doubts about game improvement irons, I suspect they just do not work for my particular game. I do not really struggle to get the ball in the air usually so do not really need that – I have seen a much tighter dispersion using irons regarded as less ‘friendly’.

 

I recently purchased from ebay the 8,9,W of the ping i200 in the exact same spec I was fit into in the G430, I combo this set with the 5 and 7 from the G430s before the woods. The i200s are more traditional lofts and a smaller head, I have found the smaller head forces me to focus on strike over just picking the yardage and swinging.

I have hit the i200s so much better even though they are supposed to be less forgiving. I find that the distance is predictable and I can also manufacture shorter shots like I used to with the PW/9i. 

 

So overall I would say that these irons are probably not for me. Disappointed but the experiment has given me renewed confidence in my game, I will likely sell on the irons at a loss at some point and purchase the full set of i200s instead.

 

  • Informative 1

  • Moderator

Welcome to The Sand Trap. Thanks for the review.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
  On 6/11/2024 at 7:36 AM, SholaAmeobi22 said:

-I have not noticed a lack of spin and have been holding greens no problem when the iron is struck well.

Expand  

Height matters a good bit with holding greens. 

  On 6/11/2024 at 7:36 AM, SholaAmeobi22 said:

When I looked up the lofts on these new irons they are all just a club longer as far as I can tell, the pitching wedge has 41 degrees of loft which has led to some considerable gapping issues lower down in my bag. Ping do offer a range of wedges in the G430 to combat this but obviously means considerable additional cost.

Expand  

That doesn't matter. Dynamic loft (what you present at impact), matters more. The loft on the club matters in that, but so does the golf shaft and your swing. Then CG matters to for launch angle, spin, etc. 

So, you have 9-10 clubs that need to split up a gap of 90-120 yards. So, it doesn't matter what the loft is, as long as club "X" goes distance "Y". Then the next club is about 10-12 yards further than that club.

  On 6/11/2024 at 7:36 AM, SholaAmeobi22 said:

I have found the clubs lower than 7 iron (8,9,W) to be extremely 'jumpy'. What I mean by this is depending on the lie/strike I am getting really unpredictable results, sometimes the wedge will go 110 yards sometimes it will go 135 yards (left or right). What I am trying to say is the faces are very hot so if you sometimes get a bit quick or jabby with your swing, it causes real problems. I often think I would rather have just fatted it 50 yards and had another shot from the fairway.

Expand  

Yep, the downfall of GI irons. They tend to be lower spinning. They tend to launch higher. They also have a "hot" clubface. So, you could catch one that just goes way further. This is why progressive sets are nice. You may want that for a 4-6 iron because the length of the club makes it more difficult to hit the center as often to produce that. From PW to 7 iron you may want it to be more of a better players iron. 

  On 6/11/2024 at 7:36 AM, SholaAmeobi22 said:

To be honest I am having some serious doubts about game improvement irons, I suspect they just do not work for my particular game. I do not really struggle to get the ball in the air usually so do not really need that – I have seen a much tighter dispersion using irons regarded as less ‘friendly’.

Expand  

That is pretty common. Even on robot testing, GI irons are less accurate than player irons.  

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

This is my first post in a very long time.  I just went through a couple of fittings and have a set of G430’s. On the way.  Fingers crossed that they work as well off grass as off a mat in a launch monitor.  You mention getting inconsistent yardages.  This is the big downside of GI and SGI irons.  If you haven’t, go to the Cool Clubs website and watch their review videos using a swing robot.  The front to back dispersion between the best strikes and the worst strikes is typically 20 yards or more with GI irons.  I’m willing to work with that because my swing is inconsistent enough that I also get huge variables with players irons in the mid irons.  However, my ball striking in the shorter irons is pretty consistent.  I’m hoping that means I won’t get those huge variations in the short irons.  We’ll see. 


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I am not sure that's the announcers - that's more the producers. It's like the "oh and we're going to cut over to Joe Schmoe here who has a 90 foot putt for eagle on 7. He's +12 for the tournament, let's see what happens", gee I wonder. But they do cut around and show the putts that go in or the shots that go close.  One of my favorite announcers is Ken Brown. He played to a high standard and he's quite engaging too. Good combination. He is always talking about how difficult a shot the guy is about to play is. Player has a chip over a ridge and he'll say something along the lines of "this is such a difficult shot - if he can get this within 15 feet of the hole he's doing very well". Then they chip it to a foot and he starts gushing. That's almost the opposite. But it does add some excitement, especially if you don't know how hard the shot is, which, let's face it, is pretty tough to tell on television.  There are though definitely some (Miller was pretty "good" at this) who will create unreasonable expectations. Like "he'll be pretty upset if he doesn't get this inside 10 feet" from 100 yards away. On a somewhat separate note, that's why I always quite enjoyed it when they showed every shot Tiger hit. Gave you a much better idea of how the game is actually played. You could watch him some days and he'd do literally nothing spectacular all day, but you add it up and he's shot 67 and you question how he did it. Well, he did it by hitting almost all the greens, making birdies on the par 5s and holing a couple of 8 foot putts on the better approach shots.
    • It's not Scottie's fault the announcers keep saying that about him, that seems like a silly reason to root for someone else IMO.    I think announcers have at least somewhat of a role in giving amateur golfers unrealistic expectations for what a good shot is. They act like PGA Tour players should make every 8 foot putt and hit it inside 5 feet from 100yds when in reality they only make just over 50% of their 8 footers and tour average from 100yds is around 20 feet.
    • Touche'. Fair point. 
    • I used to find commentators really obnoxious like this, then I watched one of the online streams of the Masters (I think it was amen corner) that had someone commentating on it, but they were literally just stating the name of the player about to hit and their score and other drab stuff. It was so bland I couldn't watch it. Worse than nothing, but I did want to know some of the stuff they were talking about, which is something of a catch-22. I did realize that the commentary team have a pretty rough time of it and do a hard job and some of them do it better than you might realize. 
    • Okay, this is my opinion. But you really should consider getting data. No offense but human memory can be odd. Sometimes we make a long putt early on with our new putter and from that first impression onward you have a "putter that's good for long putts." We may miss our first two short ones and now you have "A putter that doesn't work for short putts". Sometimes these things even out over time, sometimes they don't, but it's often tough to break our first impressions of what's happening.  Plus, let's say that in fact it is true. You putt better from long distance with a broomstick and better from close up with a standard putter. Which one holds more weight? Here's an example. If your short putting is -5 SG (Strokes Gained) and your long putting is +5 SG does that mean your over all putting is 0 SG? What if your overall putting with one putter is -2 SG and +2 SG with the other putter? The answer to which putter should you use is of course is "It depends". BUT.... If you had SG (strokes gained) data for both putters you would know right away which putter is better for you. Or at least you'd have a better idea. This still doesn't take into account the difficulty of where you are playing, and/or the particular days in which you play. We've all had those putting days where it "feels" like everything you hit rolls in. AND... we've all had those days where it "feels" like you can't make a thing.  My best advice is get putting lessons. ... My second best advice is get data.  Unless you just want to get a new putter. Than go ahead. I love shiny things and I'd be the last person to claim I have never replaced a club that was working fine just because I wanted to get a new one. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...