Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6438 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I hve been playing the same beginers full set of clubs for 8 years now and have a handicap of 14.5 now and want to upgrade my irons. I have been looking at the Nike CCI cast irons set with the s300 metal shafts. Will be going into the city"4 hours away" next week to check them out at GolfTown, but is there any others that I may want to hit as well? Any good or bad experiences with these clubs?

Driver - SQ SUMO2 9.5 stiff
3 Wood - SQ SUMO2 15* stiff
Hybrid SQ SUMO2 20* stiff
Irons - CCi steel stiff
Wedge - 56*Wedge - Knight 60*Putter - ITraxBall - platinum+Black but soon to be switching to pr0v1 SG 2.5


Posted
I hve been playing the same beginers full set of clubs for 8 years now and have a handicap of 14.5 now and want to upgrade my irons. I have been looking at the Nike CCI cast irons set with the s300 metal shafts. Will be going into the city"4 hours away" next week to check them out at GolfTown, but is there any others that I may want to hit as well? Any good or bad experiences with these clubs?

I believe that the new Nike Slingshot D4 irons so you might want to try those. There are a lot of clubs that you might want to try at that handicap. These include Titleist AP1s, Taylormade Burners or r7s, Mizuno MX-25, MP-57, Ping G10, there are plenty but I have heard good things about all of these.

In the blue and tan grom Bag:

Driver r7 460 10.5*
Fairway Woods '07 Burner 15* and 18*
Irons 4-PW r7 XDWedges 47*, 52*, 58* CG14,Putter TiffanyBall One Tour D

Posted
Take the time to go get fit. Swing a few and get your own feel. Try out the Ping G10 and the Titelist APIs, I liked em both.

In the Sasquatch Tour Stand Bag

L4V 9* Fujikura Rombax Z 6Z08
S9-1 Pro 15* Matrix OZIK X-Con
Baffler Pro 21* Golfsmith P2 irons - 4-PW True Temper Dynamic Gold X100 CG14 Chrome Wedges Dynamic Gold X100 52* 56* 60* Rossa Monza SpiderBall - TP Red


Posted
I hve been playing the same beginers full set of clubs for 8 years now and have a handicap of 14.5 now and want to upgrade my irons. I have been looking at the Nike CCI cast irons set with the s300 metal shafts. Will be going into the city"4 hours away" next week to check them out at GolfTown, but is there any others that I may want to hit as well? Any good or bad experiences with these clubs?

I haven't his the CCI cast irons, but those are the irons that Immelman won the Master's with this year so they can't be that bad. Seriously though, I've heard lots of people say they're a fantastic club and now that they're clearing them out they can be picked up cheap - Golf Town's website has the steel-shafted irons listed at $475 in their clearance section. Other nice iron sets at a similar price range that are often overlooked are the Wilson Di7 and Ci7. I've also heard great things about the Cobra S9s too. If you're willing to spend a bit more you should definitely check out Callaway X-20 and X-20 Tour irons and Ping G10s - all are fantastic clubs.

Enjoy the trip and good luck with your shopping!

Posted
I picked up a set of Cleveland CG-4's for just over $300 on close-out, I am very happy with them. I looked into the last couple years golf digest hot list, my clubs all made the list a year or 2 back. It is worth me saving about half the price to get them on close-out, they were the hot club last year and the new ones this year will be on close-out when the new ones come out!
A friend of mines son got the nike's that you mentioned and is happy with them. Do a google search for the brand and model you are considering, you will get plenty of reviews.

In my bag:
Driver:R-7 425
3-wood:R-7 steel
hybrids3&4 3DX ironwood
irons:CG4 5-PWwedgesCG14-52,CG12-56putter2-ballball:proV1x


Posted
I think if you're in the market for new irons you'd be doing yourself a major disservice if you didn't at least spend some time and try the Titleist AP1 and/or AP2. With your handicap in the mid teens and I'm sure dropping you'd probably be able to get great results with either set. Those Nike CCI aren't bad looking, I've hit the forged and liked them, but haven't any experience in the cast model.

Regardless, just spend the time to get fitted and try as many sets as you can. If it's been 8 years since your last set you're due and going to notice a significant jump in the performance pretty much no matter what you try. Good luck!
"You lick the lollipop of mediocrity once and you'll suck forever."

HiBORE XLS 9.5* Fujikura Fit On (Gold) (s) shaft | HiBORE XLS 15* 3w Fujikura Fit On (Gold) (s) shaft | 585h 21* | MP 57 4-pw w/Dynamic Gold s-300 shaft | 53* 56* Rac Chrome 60* Rac Satin | Monza Corza DB 35" | Tour ix
Home...

Posted
I swear by my Ping G10 irons. I don't plan on replacing them until I have a single digit handicap and can work the ball at will. (Neither of these things is going to happen any time soon.) Before I bought the Pings, I tried several brands and liked the Cobra S9s and FPs, TM r7 and r7 draw, and Callaway Big Berthas and X20s best. Have fun shopping!

In my C-130 bag:

Driver: G10 10.5*
3 Wood: Burner
Irons: G10 steel AWT shafts, silver dot, +1" (3-SW)Wedge: cg12 58*Putters: Squareback 2, California Coronado Low score (18 holes): 90Low score (9 holes): 42


Posted
I swear by my Ping G10 irons. I don't plan on replacing them until I have a single digit handicap and can work the ball at will. (Neither of these things is going to happen any time soon.) Before I bought the Pings, I tried several brands and liked the Cobra S9s and FPs, TM r7 and r7 draw, and Callaway Big Berthas and X20s best. Have fun shopping!

I've actually heard froma number of single digit hc's that they love the G10's and that you can work them even if it is harder than with "player's" clubs. The other nice thing about the Pings is that even if it takes 10 years to get to the point where you want to move up they'll still be in decent condition and have a good resale value. Eye 2's from 20 years ago still sell for $2-300/set (or more for berillium copper irons) and are still considered a great game improvement iron. I would have bought G10s myself if I hadn't found that I liked the Callaway X-20 Tours a little better.


Note: This thread is 6438 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.