Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Driver length

    • 46 inches
      0
    • 45 Inches
      4
    • 44 1/2 inches
      2
    • 44 inches
      0
    • Other
      2


Recommended Posts

Posted
What's the length of your driver and why - discuss. I am moving from 45 inches to 44 & 1/2 for more control and to able to let it rip a bit more

In my bag:
Titleist 910D2 w/Diamana Kaali'Stiff
Titleist 910F w/ Diamana Kaali' Stiff
Titleist 910F Hybrid 19 degree w/ Diamana Kaali' Stiff

Titleist AP1 Irons - TT S300
Titleist Vokey SM 50, 54 & 58 - Titleist Scott Cameron Newport


Posted
The driver that I have now is a 45", but when I get fitted for one (soon) I suspect that it will be 44 1/2" or 44" as I normally choke up on the long club.

Driver: MP-600 9.5 w/ Fujikura E360 Stiff Shaft
4 Wood: F-60 16.5 w/ Exsar FS3 Stiff Shaft
Irons:MP-57 3-PW w/ Dynamic Gold S300 Shafts
Wedges: MP-R Black-Ni 52, 56, & 60
Putter: Studio Select Newport 2Ball: ProV1/ProV1xGrips: Winn Xi7


Posted
unfortunately if you buy off the shelf, the standard offerings are 45-inches. with the latest quest for distance, many are moving upwards of 45-inches. i'd agree with sandwedge74...moving to a 44 or 44.5-inch driver gives us more control and confidence, and more likely greater distance (on average vs individual drives). more importantly, it also keeps us in the short grass more often and hence lowers our overall scores.

Driver: TaylorMade RocketBallz 10.5-deg
Woods: Cobra Bio Cell+ 3W and 5W
Hybrids: Bobby Jones Workshop Hybrid 3 (20-deg) and 5 (25-deg)
Irons: Srixon XXIO7 from 6 - PW
Wedge: Srixon XXIO7 GW and SW

Putter: Bobby Grace DCT Captiva 34"; Ball: Sirxon Soft Feel; Shoes: Footjoy


Posted
My current driver (have been using it for 3 years) was built by my clubfitter at 43.5", and no I'm not a midget I'm 6'1". I have found that if I go any longer I don't hit the ball in the middle of the clubface as often, and hitting the ball right on the sweetspot is worth more to me in terms of average distance than a few more mph from a longer shaft. Even with this length shaft - considered quite short by modern standards I carry the ball 260yards with a medium to high trajectory. And yes I do know my average carry distance, the 17th hole where I play once or twice a week has a water carry of 252yards from the back tees and I can happily stand there all day and clear the hazard very comfortably, the carry isn't even something I think about. Even better more often than not I'll be in the fairway.

So why not try your driver with a slightly shorter shaft, get it cut at say 44.25" to begin with because it's easier to remove a bit than it is to put a bit back on.

Note: This thread is 6346 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.