Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6345 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Here is a brief description about them:

Snake Eyes Assembled 675XC Iron Set with Steel:

These iron heads are ideal for middle handicap players (12-20) looking for a solid, clean design that offers the soft feel of a forged iron. Snake Eyes 675XC Forged Irons are the big brother to the 675C irons and provide the same high-quality performance with precision billet-forged from 1035 carbon steel. The XC irons have a soft feel but offer a higher level of forgiveness.

The cavity of the 675XC is deeper than most forged irons are able to deliver, having gone through a six-step process. Golfers who want a clean set up and traditional profile yet don't always catch the ball on the center of the clubface will appreciate this model. As with the other 675 forged irons, each face is skim-milled for flatness and scorelines are machine milled to hit the pinnacle of consistency and performance. All 675 series irons feature 8-gram weight increments that allow for a progressive swingweight set.



summary:
best part these are are forged irons for a great price

so these clubs are like players clubs (clubs for low handicap players)
has a tour shape, tour hosel, tour offset.

looks clean, and i have seen them in the store and they dont look bad at all, but its made by snake eyes. i don't know if that is exactly good or bad.
i remember before they made some really awesome wedges and that is what i remember them for until they fell off the tour scene.

what do you guys think. would you play with these and save a lot of money in comparison to other forged irons (mizuno, titleist, callaway, etc...)

you can save more then 1/2 the price of the other guys.
would you consider these clubs at all?

.

Driver: :tmade: 2017 M1 9.5° / 3-wood: :tmade: AeroBurner 13.5° / Irons: :mizuno:  MP-69 (3-PW) / Wedges: :titleist: SM6 Vokey 50°, 54°, 58° / Putter: :titleist: Scotty Cameron Newport with SuperStroke 3.0 slim, 50g counterweight / Balls: :bridgestone:  Tour B330-S

NLC Cup 2017 Champion / Grand Master's Cup 2017 Champion / TDR Cup 2017 Champion / DTG Celebration Cup 2017 Champion

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Snake Eyes is a Golfsmith company, and I've had nothing but good experiences with Golfsmith-made products. There's another thread on this board about Golfsmith components that I started (look down a few posts and you'll find it) and someone in that thread recommends that very set you're talking about.

Jess

Note: This thread is 6345 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.