Jump to content
Note: This thread is 5963 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

http://perfectpractice.wordpress.com...driver-set-up/



he uses an analysis on hogan's and nicklaus positions. Nowadays...nicklaus' seems to be the predominant school of thought on the topic.

what do you think about his opinion on ball position?

--im not sure if its his original idea...but i found it on his site.

TMX Carry Bag
Tour Burner 9.5*
Burner 3W 15*
Burner Rescue Hybrid 19*
r7 TP 4i-SW Dynamic Gold S300s 60* CG-14 Circa 62 #2 & Studio Stainless Newport 2 Pro V1x


Is it just me or is that not very well written?

In my Ping UCLAN Team Bag

Nike Sasqautch 9.5 - V2 Stiff
Cleveland HiBore 15 - V2 Stiff
Ben Hogan Apex FTX, 2 - PW - Dynamic Gold StiffNike SV Tour 52, 58 - Dynamic Golf StiffYes Golf Callie - 33 inchesBall - Srixon Z star X


I use the Nicklaus school although I need some work to strictly follow the method. The width of my stance is not consistent. I find for instance that I widen my stance on the driver in addition to moving the ball to inside the front heel. I also think I leave the stance too wide for my lower irons. So many problems so little time. I don't know about the article writer's adjustment to the Hogan method whereby he doesn't transition from the closed to open stance as his stance narrows for the high irons. Someone explained the reason for opening and closing the stance like this:

An open stance effectively moves the ball back further in your stance. Draw a line through the ball as it lays on the ground parallel to the stance (this will be at an angle to the target line for an open stance); draw another line through the golfers feet parallel to that one representing the "stance line". Now draw a perpindicular line between them from the ball. If you do this for say Hogans wedge position the perpindicular line intersects that "stance line" at about the middle of his stance. The ball is off his left heel if you drop a line from the ball straight vertically down but the open stance changes the dynamic.

I question how one can get their swing to bottom out just in front of a ball that is in the position off the left heel when using a wedge. Sure narrowing the stance will move the bottoming out point forward but I might have a hard time with that.

My Clubs
Nicklaus Progressive XC Irons: 3H,4H, 5-GW
Ray Cook SW & Gyro 1 Putter
Taylor Made Burner Driver 10.5
Taylor Made V-Steel 3 & 5 MetalsMy Home Course: Indian RiverMy Blog: Rant-o-Rama-Ding-Dong


I used to change my ball position depending on which club I was using. However, I've changed to basically always off the front heel.

i'm going to go hit balls today and try the front heel method...it seems like you can be more consistent with moving your foot than with ball position.

TMX Carry Bag
Tour Burner 9.5*
Burner 3W 15*
Burner Rescue Hybrid 19*
r7 TP 4i-SW Dynamic Gold S300s 60* CG-14 Circa 62 #2 & Studio Stainless Newport 2 Pro V1x


I'm glad you brought this topic up. In Jack Nicklaus' videos, Golf My Way, he says he always plays off the left heel and uses the same swing for every shot. He just widens or closes the stance based on the club. He also opens the stance for short clubs (since he plays a power fade). I'm not sure where this guy (the one who wrote that article) got his information from about Nicklaus moving the ball around for normal shots. Nicklaus said in his video he only did that for special shots.

Another thing, has anyone tried Hogan's approach with the foot moving back to a closed position for the long irons and above? I never really thought about it, but it makes so much sense I might just have to try it. I must have not even realized it, but looking again at Five Lessons, it makes total sense with Hogan's swing. I heard of doing drills with the right foot way back, to learn to hook the ball and get away from slicing, but doing it a small amount on a regular basis with the long clubs seems very interesting.

Lastly, and maybe it is just because of how poorly written that article really is, how does that guy take the "Nicklaus" approach and the "Hogan" approach and arrive at his "ideal" approach? Seems to me like the "ideal" approach is just the best looking, but not the most functional when it comes to adapting the same swing to the different clubs.

Next time I hit the range, I'm taking Five Lessons with me and trying the Hogan method.
Favorite Practice Course:
Z Boaz Municipal, Fort Worth <<< Ben Hogan grew up playing here!
--------------------------------------------------

In the bag: 983E 9.5*, Fuji Speeder S RPM LP, 4W, Neutral Bias STAFF Ci6 irons, S (going up for sale soon) Tom Watson PVD 08 Wedges (G.S,L)... and a 4...

I use to hit everything off the inside of my front foot. I spent the better part of 3 months this year changing the ball position to the middle of my stance and adjusting to which club I used... because I wanted to learn to play golf the "right" way.

Now that I have made the transition I can say this about the two styles. If you have your front foot in an open position... obviously you are going to fade, cut, and slice the ball more than you want. The ball further up in your stance changes your whole game to basically a flop game with your irons. I would get an insane amount of height with my iron shots. You also will more than likely develop somewhat of a slide towards the ball during transition as well as lose a little bit of distance.

Unless I cant judge the center of my stance I would say now I hit my wedges and high irons about a half ball in front of center of my stance. This was the only thing that made me feel like I was making a good weight shift and transition towards the ball. If it were in the middle I would just hang back and hit it fat. Mid irons would be about a ball further up in my stance and low irons, fairway woods and low hybrids (I only use an 18*) another ball forward.

Maybe I am completely wrong but this is what I have found from doing both schools of thought.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Interesting analysis tincup. I am realizing now I am using kind of a hybrid approach which leads to probably inconsistent results. With the wedges for example I know I narrow my stance as well as place the ball in the middle. I definitely widen my stance with the driver and place the ball off the left heel. So as far as convention goes my ball positioning is a mess. I just have never concentrated on what I was doing enough. Maybe I should.

My Clubs
Nicklaus Progressive XC Irons: 3H,4H, 5-GW
Ray Cook SW & Gyro 1 Putter
Taylor Made Burner Driver 10.5
Taylor Made V-Steel 3 & 5 MetalsMy Home Course: Indian RiverMy Blog: Rant-o-Rama-Ding-Dong


anybody feel a loss of distance with the hogan technique? i've been trying it out and it seems like my ball flies consistently about 10-15 yards shorter. I feel like, because my foot is flared, i cant hold off my lag as long. Mainly, my tempo is a little off because with this technique i feel like im taking a longer swing than i would if my front foot was parallel with my back.


It also feels like i cant get aggresive if i wanted to. If im in that between the clubs distance....it feels like i cant just hit my shorter club longer. Feels like im limited to making an 85% swing.

Although the shots do go nice and straight...it feels like im losing lag and definitely losing backspin and stopping power on the green.

TMX Carry Bag
Tour Burner 9.5*
Burner 3W 15*
Burner Rescue Hybrid 19*
r7 TP 4i-SW Dynamic Gold S300s 60* CG-14 Circa 62 #2 & Studio Stainless Newport 2 Pro V1x


anybody feel a loss of distance with the hogan technique? i've been trying it out and it seems like my ball flies consistently about 10-15 yards shorter. I feel like, because my foot is flared, i cant hold off my lag as long. Mainly, my tempo is a little off because with this technique i feel like im taking a longer swing than i would if my front foot was parallel with my back.

Yes you will lose distance, Hogan says this. You will however make up for it in accuracy.


anybody feel a loss of distance with the hogan technique?

I use to hit everything off the inside of my front foot. I spent the better part of 3 months this year changing the ball position to the middle of my stance and adjusting to which club I used... because I wanted to learn to play golf the "right" way.

See bold sentences

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Note: This thread is 5963 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 65 - 2024-12-04 Helped @NatalieB with her stuff on the force plates, then hit some balls working on the left wrist stuff. Picking up the club.
    • Day 216 (4 Dec 24) - Dink and roll Weds - working on the green side short game covering 5-10 yd chips to low running pitches to about 50 yds (I have accommodating neighbors).  Focused on keeping stance more narrow, eye target about 2” in front of the ball AND not looking up until I see the ball leave.  This drill has really enhanced my confidence in making more consistent ball strikes.  
    • As a supporter of the European team even though I chose to live in the US, this is kind of good news. I'm pretty close to Bethpage, but won't be going at these prices. Neither will the crazy drunk NY sports fans who would have made this a very difficult place to play as a Euro. The tickets will go to the city types who are entertaining clients and don't care about the money. Many of them are going to sit there and watch, not get all raucous. I am not dumb enough to believe that this is going to be like a Sunday afternoon stroll in the park for the Euros, but I think it will be significantly more subdued as a result of the prices. Even at $250 I would probably have been watching on the TV anyway so no real skin in the game. 
    • First, it is on free TV. NBC is free to anyone with an antenna, and is on almost any TV in the U.S. with a minimal amount of effort. Charging "a bargain price" would be incredibly dumb. They charged $750 and the event sold out almost immediately. You could better argue they should have charged MORE, not less. What happens if you charge less: ticket scalpers buy up even more of the tickets because they see value: if tickets were $250, they'd clearly have sold for $1k or more on the secondary market. That's tremendous value. Fans would end up paying the same or more, or just not being able to go. Sure, a few who happened to be online at the precise moment on a fast connection and didn't fumble with their credit cards might have gotten tickets for $250, but the secondary market and ticket brokers would have scooped up the vast majority with automated processes and bots and scripts, then re-sold them later on. This way, fans get to purchase the tickets, and the PGA is earning that revenue, not the secondary ticket brokers. Econ 101. Supply and Demand. Nope.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...