Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6357 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Don't just say "1 degree".... I want to hear what you guys play and why? I've only had 9.5 drivers with low launch shafts and now I'm switching to a 10.5 with a high launch shaft. I'm just switching just to switch. But I figure I might as well ask you "high launch" guys how you like it.

"One of the reasons Arnie Palmer is playing so well is that, before each final round, his wife takes out his balls and kisses them. Oh my God, what have I just said."
US Open TV Commentator

S9-1 Pro D Driver 9.5 Degree Matrix Ozik XCON-6
CGB 3WPro Baffler 2/R 2HybridMP-37 Project X 6.0Vokey...


Posted
12* with a mid launch shaft here and I love it! The balooned shots are do-able and so are the stinger thin shots. And the ones that come off perfect leave me right with my playing partners but in the fairway.

No I hate it, 12* degree drivers suck.....did the market value go down yet?

Posted
I use a 10.5 degree and I like it. I don't hit it all that high, but now very low either. I'd say Mid-trajectory which is what I prefer.

Driver Ping G10 10.5*
Hybrids Ping G5 (3) 19* Bridgestone J36 (4) 22*
Irons Mizuno MP-57 5-PW
Wedges Srixon WG-504 52.08 Bridgestone WC Copper 56.13
Putter 33" Scotty Cameron Studio Select #2


Posted
I have a 10* Mizuno MP001 and a 9* Exotics XCG... The 10* will tend to balloon on me if I dont pay extra attention to tee height etc. The 9* isnt a true 9... it actually flies lower, more like an 8 or 8.5 with little spin.... so I get far more distance from my roll.

Personally, I dont care what the ball flight is as long as I am getting the desired result.

13 Wedges
1 Putter


Posted
I use a 10.5 TM driver. The launch i get ispretty high which i both like and dislike.

I like it because, as a long hitter, I can cut doglegs more easily (over trees etc). I also get a ton of carry and less roll, so I can hit over hazards, and I don't really roll much into them.

I dislike it because the high launch puts the ball in the air longer, so slice spin has more time to affect my ball. I think a lower ball would hit the ground sooner straightening out the movement, and ruff would affect it sooner. Also, my current high driver launch also puts the ball up in the wind.

There are pros and cons obviously. I would love to have a 9 or even 8.5* driver to put in my bag for certain courses, but i generally think my current driver is more fun.
Bag: Flight SS
Driver: 10.5* r5 draw with Pro Launch blue 65 Stiff
Irons: CCi Forged 3i-pw
Wedges: 56* CG12 black pearl and 60* low bounce RTG 900
Putter: i-Series Anser 35"Ball: e5+Tee: Zero FrictionGlove: FootJoy WeatherSofRangefinder: MedalistShoes: Sp-6 II, Adidas 360Scores this year:92 91...

Posted
I use a 10.5 TM driver. The launch i get ispretty high which i both like and dislike.

Same thing I've found. I have a 9-degree Golfsmith Cermet and a 10.5-degree Golfsmith Long Jon.

The Long Jon launches like a rocket, but if I didn't hit it straight it's going to have a long time to make its mind up about where it wants to land. Advantages include the ability to go over fairly tall trees, and as long as I'm hitting it decent it's more accurate. The Cermet launches low and stays there. It's straighter, by and large, but easier to mis-hit. Advantages include an incredible amount of roll after the shot, and it's a draw-biased driver, so I don't slice as much. I'm about to put both in the closet and go with a Snake Eyes Mamba, probably a 9-degree. Jess

Posted
Don't just say "1 degree".... I want to hear what you guys play and why? I've only had 9.5 drivers with low launch shafts and now I'm switching to a 10.5 with a high launch shaft. I'm just switching just to switch. But I figure I might as well ask you "high launch" guys how you like it.

I did just that and am very happy with the results. Good carry is easier now. It is a source of confidence when you survey the hole ahead of you from the tee with the knowledge that the hazards and bunkers can be carried.

For me.....I suspect the shaft was just as much...if not more...of a factor than the one degree of loft. The changes aren't too extreme....but I'm glad I didn't go with the 12 degree model. I went from very low trajectory with tons of roll to an upper mid trajectory with more carry that equals the total distance I was getting before. Good luck.
909D Comp 9.5* (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-6)
Burner Superfast 3 & 5 woods (house MATRIX OZIK XCON-4.8)
G15 Hybrid 23* (AWT shaft)
G5 5 iron-PW-46*, UW-50*, SW-54 & LW-58 (AWT shaft)
Studio Select Newport 2 Mid SlantGrips: PING cords & Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Coumpound Bag: C-130...

Posted
Right now I'm personally playing a Nike Sasquatch Tour 8.5* with the Version 2 head (the same one that Tiger is playing) with a Pershing Graphite Design 75-X shaft tipped half an inch. I have a pretty high spin rate so this club let's me hit low burners which I like. I hit a Nickent 10.5* with a Diamana White Board 73-X tipped one inch the other day that had the exact same flight with about 5-10 more yards of carry. Just goes to show it's not the number on the club but the shaft that it's attached to....

Posted
I use a 9.5 with a high kcpt shaft to keep it lower than standard 9.5 trajectory with the Hiborexl. Don't forget when you drop a degree in your driver, the sidespin will be compounded..so your fade could be a bigger fade. your draw will turn into a bigger draw.... but I find it easier to work the ball (when I'm hitting it right) either right to left or left to right.
DJ Yoshi
Official DJ: Rutgers Football
Boost Mobile Tour
In My Bag
HiBoreXL 9.5 White Board D63 Stiff Exotics CB2 5 Wood, Exotics CB3 3 Wood MP-60 5.5 Flighted Shafts 54 & Cleveland CG-10 60 Newport 2

Posted
you have to know the numbers... find a launch monitor

ball, loft, and shaft combo can create different results

Daniel Duarte
905R UST Proforce V2 76g 44" S
904F 15, Graphite Design YS6+
MD Hybrid, 19 Degree, UST V2 Hybrid S
Pro M Gunmetal 5-PW, Nippon 1150GH Pro SVokey Oil Can 52 - RAWVokey Spin Milled Oil Can 56, 60 - RAWTEI3 Newport II - Torch Copper- Prov1x


Note: This thread is 6357 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.