Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3892 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Its not the club...

But if you insist on hitting a wood with a smaller head, go with a "strong 3"... probably a 13* 3 wood.
Bag: Flight SS
Driver: 10.5* r5 draw with Pro Launch blue 65 Stiff
Irons: CCi Forged 3i-pw
Wedges: 56* CG12 black pearl and 60* low bounce RTG 900
Putter: i-Series Anser 35"Ball: e5+Tee: Zero FrictionGlove: FootJoy WeatherSofRangefinder: MedalistShoes: Sp-6 II, Adidas 360Scores this year:92 91...

Posted
I have my Taylor Made 200 Steel that is a small headed driver and I crush the ball and have much more accuracy with the club. With the big 460cc head on my current driver it kind of feels like a stop sign on a stick.

I may well just shelf the big driver here soon.
Weapons Of Choice
R5 Dual 9.5* Driver
R7 Draw Hybrid 3
Tight Lies #4 16* Fairway Wood
HCT Tour Irons 5-SW CG-11 52 CG-11 56 CG-11 60 BC-101 Putter

Posted
  Uthinkso said:
I have my Taylor Made 200 Steel that is a small headed driver and I crush the ball and have much more accuracy with the club. With the big 460cc head on my current driver it kind of feels like a stop sign on a stick.

Are you referring to your R7 425? Because those drivers are only 425cc's.

Here's what I play:

Titleist 907 D2 10.5* UST ProForce V2 76-S | Titleist 906F4 18.5* Aldila VS Proto "By You" 80-S | Titleist 585H 21* Aldila VS Proto "By You" 80-S | Titleist ZB 4-PW TTDG S300 | Bob Vokey Spin Milled Oil Can 54.10 | Bob Vokey Spin Milled Oil Can 60.08 | Scotty Cameron Red X5 33" |


Posted
I'm a big fan of smaller head drivers, after trying a few of the new 460cc's I decided I don't like most of them except a few (TM Tour Burner TP and Adams A3 XTD). I have been teeing off with my R7 CGB max 3 wood with good success (220-250 total yards) and I picked up a R7 425 with a Fuji Speeder 569 tonight. I think having a smaller head subconciously forces you to hit the center of the face instead of just making contact with the ball anywhere on a huge 460cc head giving you better overall results.

SLDR 430 TP Graphite Design DI-6s
SLDR Mini Driver TP Graphite Design DI-6s
SLDR 4h Matrix Black Tie 95s
Ping G25 4-PW
Ping Gorge 50, 54, 58

Ping Anser IWI


Posted
I think having a smaller head subconciously forces you to hit the center of the face instead of just making contact with the ball anywhere on a huge 460cc head giving you better overall results.

Subconscious or not try hitting it in the middle of the one on the right, buggered if I know how I used to do it!

The thing on the left belongs to my son, it's 460cc, second from the left is my current driver a Mizuno MP001 at 390cc, third from the left is a graphite headed Yonex ADX 300 I used for a few years about 10 years ago and the tiny thing on the right is a Dunlop persimmon I used in the mid eighties for a year or so. I've got loads more of them packed away in boxes, we moved house on the weekend.

Posted
Well I used that old small driver today and I did not slice nearly as much. Drives didnt go real far but they were straight.

MacTec 460 Draw Driver
V-Foil M565 Irons
MT 3 Wood
GigaGolf 52deg gap wedge
Wilson 55deg sand wedge MT Don White 60deg Lob wedgeknockoff 2-ball putter


Posted
How much smaller must it be to be comortable? Titleist's new lineup includes a 440cc driver.

Index 2.8
In the bag: Rapture V2 10.5, Ping G10 Hybrids (18/21/24), Ping i10s (5-PW), Ping Tour Wedges (52/56/60), Ping Anser, TM Burner ball, Golf Guru GPS


Posted
I generally like smaller heads on my drivers. I grew up playing my dad's old persimmon Wilson driver and I guess I just got use to it. I played with a 460cc driver for a while but went to the Ping that I use now and I love it.

I had the chance to hit a TaylorMade R7 this past weekend and really didnt' see that much difference in distance. I was putting it out there about 270-275 with both.

Driver:  Speedline 9.5° w/ Grafalloy Prolaunch AXIS Red Shaft
Fairway:  '07 Burner Fairways
Irons:  Apex Edge 3-W

Wedge:  52° & 58° /  60° 588 Satin

Putter:  Anser 4


Posted

I have used a 130cc driver. It is scary to look at when addressing the ball. The thing is the size of the ball! It doesn't hit that bad, but does take focus. The original TaylorMade Burner is a little bigger at around 145cc. Metal drivers from about 130cc to 185cc were once called "standard size drivers." A persimmon or laminated sugar maple driver that is 240cc is like a 200cc metal driver. The large wooden hosel takes up a great deal of extra volume. The smallest wooden driver I have seen is 175cc. It is about the same as a 150cc metalwood. I just restored the head on the 130cc and reshafted and regripped it about a week ago. The shaft is spine aligned, the grip custom sized at .960'', and all of the works. I hit it a few times about a month ago. I plan to hit it again soon with the new treatment.

I prefer to use a heavily modified version of Wilson's 1993 "The Whale." It is a midsize graphite driver and is equivalent to about a 250cc metal driver. The graphite head feels great and for some reason I hit it really well. I love the contented looking whale on the soleplate.

Drivers over 290cc look too big to me. I consistently slice with them. 460cc drivers are just crazy! None of the modern driver offerings of today get my serious consideration. I wish the manufacturers would shrink the size of the drivers. I keep hearing about cracked and dented drivers nowadays. Smaller heads should be more durable. All driver clubheads weight close to 200g. A smaller size could afford to give more weight to the crown, sole, and skirt strength. Why do they keep making lighter crowns when I see people cave in the crowns on their drivers accidentally. I am just plain aggravated by the golf driver trends. I like my Whale!


Posted
I just restored the head on the 130cc and reshafted and regripped it about a week ago. The shaft is spine aligned, the grip custom sized at .960'', and all of the works. I hit it a few times about a month ago. I plan to hit it again soon with the new treatment.

I hit a bunch of balls with the little driver yesterday. It must be me or something because it was outperforming "The Whale."

Both were giving excellent sweet hits, but the 130cc was working the ball back to center a whole lot more on the poor strikes. The distance loss on the off-center hits was essentially the same with the two as well. The 130cc sometimes had a pop-up, but I could hit it off of the short grass too. The Whale has the same loft, but I can't do that with it. The little driver practically has a low profile face, so that helped on the grass. Both had great shaft feedback. The little guy made a tiny ping on the sweet hits, but felt solid also. It was a thoroughly enjoyable experience using the 130cc once I forgot about the size. Its performance was not proportional to its volume, so I forgot about it.

Posted
  AlCzervik said:
Right now I've got a 460cc size driver, and all I hit is massive slices with the ball. It stayed out of my bag while i used my 3 wood to tee balls since i hit that fairly straight. My 3 wood is busted and I dont plan on replacing it until next season.

Try looking at Callaway's pre-owned site. They also have other brands of vintage [used] clubs. I have also found similar items at Golf Galaxy and Golfsmith, as they have trade-ins and used clubs for sale. I think there are a few reasons why there is a difference between the 460 and older clubs. 1. I've noticed that some of the grooves have been removed from the sweet spot on my new vs. old driver. I believe this is because the equip. mfg. are trying to produce a few extra yards of distance by reducing spin. 2. Loft and launch angle and shaft flex vs. swing speed The 3W has a higher loft angle which, I believe, helps fly straighter shots. I did a little experiment myself on the course the other day. I had Callaway X460 tour 9.5*and a GBB/Warbird 200cc 10* I was slicing the X460 all over the place, while the WB was making a slight fade down the fairway. I wasn't getting as much distance, but I was left with a much better 2nd shot. BTW, picked up the Warbird for $12 at Golf Galaxy. Can also be used to hit off the deck with it's small size. http://www.golfgalaxy.com/ http://www.golfsmith.com/ http://callawaygolfpreowned.com/

Driver: X460 tour- 9.5*
3-wood: 3+ - 13*
Hybrid: BB HW 20*
Hybrid: 24*
Irons: X-20 Uniflex SteelWedges: Colonial 56* & 60*Putter: XG SabertoothBall: GPS-8âIf you are caught on a golf course during a storm and are afraid of lightning, hold up a 1-iron. Not even God...


Posted
As competitive as the golf club industry is you would think one of the major players would come out with a new smaller headed driver just for the niche market and the novelty of it. You walk into Golf Galaxy and it’s a sea of ham hocks on a stick. A high tech looking small head driver with a claim of faster club head speed and more control would stand out (be it true or not).

Driver: Ping K15 10°, Mitsubishi Diamana Blueboard 63g Stiff
Fairway 4-wood: TaylorMade RocketBallz Tour TP 17.5°, Matrix Ozik TP7HD S shaft

Hybrids: Callaway Diablo Edge 3H-4H, Aldila DVS Stiff
Irons: MIURA PP-9003, Dynamic Gold Superlite S300, Sand Wedge: Scratch 8620 56°
Putter: Nike Method Concept Belly 44"
Ball: Bridgestone Tour B330-S


Posted
  AlCzervik said:
I tee it up alot lower with the 3wood and have the ball more forward in my stance. If i try that with the driver I get a slice that carries 2 fairways over.

Wait a minute did you say that you play a 3 wood further forward in your swing than your driver? That would definately be the source of a slice because you can't close the face in time for impact. I used to have the same problem with woods but you have to trust it is going to work. You are likely not getting enough extension through the ball, yet when you play a driver back in your stance you get stuck and can't release the clubhead in time. You should definately be playin the ball slightly ahead of where you tee your three wood. You can tee the ball lower to reduce sidespin. Also work on your flexibility because your swing is being rerouted at a certain point and you aren't able to fully extend through the ball that is played past a certain point in your stance.


Posted
I have a problem with 460 drivers also. I consider the driver as one of my best clubs but can't come around on a 460 driver. I have an old TaylorMade r7 Quad from 2004 that is I believe 400cc and I hit it awesome, about a 5 yard draw pretty consistently, and I can do that with a couple of my friends older and smaller headed drivers. However if you put any 460cc driver in my hands I will not get around on it and it will cut about 40 yards. The only one I have ever gotten around a small percentage of the time is the callaway ft-i. I am really excited about the new 440cc Titleist. I wish it was a 420cc but beggars can't be choosers I guess. Hope I can hit that thing cause I will buy it in about 3.2 seconds if I can.

Posted
I honestly don't like the sound of most of the rivers over 400cc that I have hit. They all seem to make a "KLONK!" sound. My 350cc King Cobra sounds good and looks good at address/impact.

My web design business


  • 6 years later...
Posted

I too like a small head to drive with. I bought the new Taylormade 3 wood-driver that has three different lofts, 12* 14* and 16*. I bought the 14* and originally used it for a three wood only and it is loooong ! I also use it as a driver and it is straight as an arrow and on average of all drives it is just as long as a driver. It is a fixed loft SLDR so there are no adjustments. I am wondering how it would do in a 12* with a driver length shaft. Any one of you might want to try that 3-wood/driver. I don't think you will be disappointed.


Note: This thread is 3892 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Played 9 holes, shot a 39.  Kind of got around. Everything between the trees, so in play. Short game was rusty. Got to get back on that. Greens were stupidly slow because they got a lot of rain yesterday and probably couldn't cut them down. Usually in the summer they are firm and pretty fast for how sloped they are. Got to work on face to path a bit. 
    • We agree here. Top of the car has a forward force, bottom of the car experiences a backward force via the braking. Both about the COM (somewhere in between). Result is a rotational flip. Since the forward force is still higher the car probably still globally travels forward. Sure, pretty basic. You really think there are deliberate twist forces applied? Like forcing the club head forward and simultaneously forcing grip end in the opposite direction? Heck I don't think we even slow down the grip end deliberately let alone force it the other way. Sorry, if I am missing something here. The orientation change is simple incidental because there is different rate of global movement of grip vs. clubhead throughout the swing. I also happen to think the best swings have the least amount of differential movement between the two end in the impact zone.  In my defense, I never thought one could do justice in covering all aspects of a golf swing in a paragraphs or two to begin with. Especially not with grade school physics..😜 Okay.
    • Wow, @DeadMan that is such a helpful breakdown of what’s around. Really excited to check a bunch of these out. Thank you. Will definitely go to Walnut Creek. Will also try and get a commonground tee time. Haven’t played many Doak courses yet! If your schedule frees up, let me know! 
    • Yeah. I'm not sure what Vishal is really talking about with the "constrained" COM. The club's COM doesn't really change much. Less than the body's does… We definitely apply force to the golf club to move it both translationally (linear force) and rotationally (torque) to the golf club. That's what Manzella's alpha/beta/gamma is all about. Even before they switched the reference frame from the global to the club-based one. 😉 
    • Any time you apply a force to an object that is not directly through the COM, you're applying a torque. Take a car for example. If a car is moving and you hit the brakes, the only contact point is on the ground. The brakes make the tires slow down which applies a force backwards at ground level. Since that force is not applied directly to the COM, it also applies a torque, which makes the car rotate forwards. The suspension at the front applies another torque upwards to fight against that twist (because the ground is in the way). You can feel the front end of the car dip when you brake. Then, when you stop braking and that force is no longer applied, the tires stop applying that torque to the car and the car feels like it rocks backwards as the suspension evens itself out. That's all torques being applied. Ignoring the twist forces applied to the club leaves you way short of being able to describe the motion. Otherwise the orientation of the club would never change.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...