Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6309 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Like $Nassau mentioned above, as far as possible with a straight left arm. So, the distance would depend on how flexible you are. Some must bend the left elbow some, but at the cost of accuracy, as the weight of the club will likely pull that joint straight when in the impact zone.

Posted
isn't there a measure/degrees?

The distance depends on the golfer's physical make-up, as a taller person will have longer arms than a shorter one.

The angle depends on the swing method used. I employ the classic golf swing, and try to get my shoulders to 90° at the top of the back swing. Because I want to remain synced and connected, my preferred hand position would be in front of, or just past my chest, so I'd like my hands to fall close to 90°/95° when looking down from an above view.

Posted

I don't think there is. Remember, there are many varying swings, body types, arm lengths, and flexibilities that would make it impossible to set a golden rule as to the pitch between a golfer's head and hands at the top of the back swing.

It would be like saying one shoe fits all.


Posted
I don't think there is. Remember, there are many varying swings, body types, arm lengths, and flexibilities that would make it impossible to set a golden rule as to the pitch between a golfer's head and hands at the top of the back swing.

then would be good thinking as far as possible?


Posted
then would be good thinking as far as possible?

Yes, because as your arm swings down in a circular path into the ball, you'll want the radius (arm length) to remain constant, from beginning through impact.


Posted
I hitted some shots and I recorder them trying to get wider at the top of the backswing.
I had the problem of a steeper downswing, now that seems to have solved that, now I egt the famous slot position at the middle of the downswing.
I am surprised that a wider backswing solved that problem.

Posted
Oh I believe I misinterpreted your original question. Were you asking of how wide to take your back swing?

From what I understand, when golfers swing back with a wide takeaway (or a one piece takeaway,) they're swinging back with their bodies and will allow their wrists to cock back naturally. Little, to no hand manipulation in the back swing will probably lead to the same in the transition and down swing.

Note: This thread is 6309 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.