Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6315 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Okay, here is my situation:

I don't print a lot at home, but my 10 year old HP DeskJet 832c needs a new color ink cartridge. $40 frickin' dollars at Staples. And the black ink is due to run out any time.

I have a laser printer for document printing, but I want something that can do color when I want it.

I also have a 10 year old scanner that is incompatible with XP. (I don't foresee upgrading to Vista in the near future.)

So instead of figuring out another workaround for the scanner (I figured it out once before) and putting money into ink for an obsolete printer, I am considering a cheap All-In-One Printer/Scanner/Copier/Fax.

I think I can get by without wireless printing because I have a home network, but in case I've ditch the desktop for good, that feature would be nice (unless wireless print servers are cheap.)

However, a document feeder is mandatory.

Can anyone recommend an All-In-One that they have been happy with? I've done some Googling and Cnet.com reading, but can't find a consensus.


Thanks.

Posted
Harry,
I can recommend one thing for you in the world of printers since I just bought 18 new ones for my office. When it comes to printers, they all work similar, so go with the one that has the cheapest ink. For that, it seems to be Canon. We use Canon All in ones for the last 2 weeks and absolutely love them. Best of all, the ink is half the price of Lexmark and HP.

For more info, our machines cost $13 for black ink.

Posted
Check out Kodak's line of all-in-ones. I replaced my HP with a Kodak and I'm impressed with text quality as well as photo quality. The color is not as vivid as HP's inks, but only on a side by side comparison. If you didn't have a comparison, you'd think the print was perfect. The inks are considerably less expensive.

Tools of my game:
Burner 09' Driver 10.5 Reg flex
5-pw G10's/ plus Taylormade R7 4 iron
Burner 08' 4 Hybrid
A70S 3 Hybrid Burner 09' 3 wood "Zing" SW 56 degree Fastback Laser range finder / plus Skycaddie SG5...also a great ball retriever!!


Posted

And no matter what the deal is for an Epson, dont't do it. DON'T DO IT!!!! I dont care, DON'T DO IT!

So much fail in one package.

Driver- Nike Sasquatch 10.5/Aldila VS Proto ByYou
5 wood- Taylormade CGB Max Clone
3-PW- Nike Pro Combo Tour Clones
3 Hybrid (2i replacement)-Ben Hogan Edge CFT
Wedge- Vokey 56 degree Oil Can ClonePutter- Guerin Rife 2-Bar CloneBag- Cougar Hydro III Carry Bag


Posted
I've been happy with the Canon's and currently have the Pixma780 (which isn't made anymore)
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Thanks for the input everyone. I picked up a Canon Pixma MX310 on sale for $79. All the reviews I read were that it's a great little inkjet for home use.

Like I said, I already have a laser printer for documents, so this is a printer for light color use and to replace an obsolete scanner. We'll see how it works out.

Posted
Harry,
Glad I could help. I have the exact same printer in my home office. it works good and the ink is dirt cheap.

Posted
Hey guys, I own a printer supply company and whenever this topic comes up, I always give the same response. Always buy HP for several reasons. First, you can always find supplies either new or compatible. Second, you can always find someone to work on them because most people are trained in HP maintenance. Third, the quality of HP is easily better than any of the other companies out there. I constantly switch people from new HP to compatibles all the time and save them over half the price of new ones. From my experience, the worst printers and supply cost gouging you can encounter are from Brother, Lexmark and smaller ones like Okidata. HP makes some multifunction printers that are great. They are making the color laser printers so quickly these days, it's kind of like last years golf clubs. If you buy last years model, you can save some serious coin.
That's all I have. Good night.
In my Vantage bag:
Driver::905R 8.5*(V2)
3 Wood:Launcher 13*(V2)
Irons:AP2 (Project X 5.5) (3-W)
HybridTWS 19*Gap wedge:CG15 50* Sand wedge:CG15 56*Putter:: XG9 (35")Ball:ProV1X

Posted
Printers are almost disposable for inkjet nowadays so I cant imagine paying someone to service one. I have an HP and like it, but the ink is almost twice as much as my Canons.

Posted
I might agree with you on laser printers, J.W. But not on inkjets or other peripherals. HPs quality has declined markedly the past decade. I have personal experience with several returns, warrantied items, self repairs, and work-arounds necessitated by HP's refusal to write updated drivers when operating systems change.

For example, the scanner I just replaced with the Canon All-In-One, when I tried to load the scanner driver software, the HP software actually gave me an error message that said "This product is not compatible with Windows XP. Please consider upgrading to a newer HP product." [parphrased]

Uhh, bite me. I paid for the scanner once and I shouldn't have to throw it in the landfill after 5 years because your profits are slipping and your stock price is down. It took me forever to find a workaround on the internet.

Check around on any review site (e.g., cnet.com) and look at the number of dissatisfied consumers.

Oh, and anyone notice how the price of HP toner and ink gets more expensive the older the product gets? To the point where it's more economical to buy a whole new product? Not real subtle.

Has laser cartridge technology really advanced so much that HP needs to keep changing the physical design of the toner cartridges? I doubt it. But if people buying new printers looked at the cost of toner and decided it was too high, they would buy another brand. And if cartridges stayed the same, people would just keep buying more toner. And if the printers were made poorly and broke, HP would get a bad reputation and lose new customers.

The printer is the bait. The ink/toner is the hook. That's where the manufacturer makes its money. (Does "the first taste is free" sound familiar?)

Note: This thread is 6315 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.