Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 7407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm looking to upgrade my 580xd and want to get one of the r7's. What is the difference between the original r7 and the r7 425 other than a bigger head? I tried the r7 425 out lastnight and liked it but they didnt have an original r7 to test out. With the price being $200 dollars different im leaning towards the orig. r7 cause I can't seem to see what the real difference would be for an average golfer like myself. Can you guys help me decide. Is the 425 worth the extra $200 dollars? P.S. - I'm going with a 10.5 degree this time.

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


Posted
an help would be appreciated guys

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


  • Administrator
Posted
an help would be appreciated guys

Without knowing how much free cash you have, which none of us would ever ask you, of course, it's tough to say whether it's worth it (for you) for $200.

I'd get the 425, because it seems to be pretty spiffy. I never did get along with the original r7 much.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Tried both and I have to say go with the 425. The face seems to have more feel than the old R7. Beside can't go wrong with new technologies.

Rick T.
A Big Equipment Freak!!!
Life is too short not to tried everything out there

In the BagDriver: SuperQuad 10.5 REG BABYWoods: TP 3 or 5 woods R7 stiffIrons: AP1 4-PW w/Project X 5.5Wedge: Spin milled 54 (bent to 52) 56 & Special Grind "P" 60Putter: Gauge Design Japan " The Balde"Ball:...


Posted
I am having the same dilemma as I said in a different thread. My problem is the offset of the new r7(425). It's hard for me to compare the drivers because I've never played a round with the new r7(425). I've only hit it on the range and on launch monitors. However, from what I've experienced, I think the new r7 is a little longer, but not by much, only about 5-10yards. The big difference was forgiveness. I found the new r7(425) to be much for forgiving on off-center hits. As for my choice, I dont know yet. Like I said the increase in offset of the new r7(425) compared to its original is a turnoff for me, but I'm interested in getting the newest technology possible. I think I'll end up waiting for the 905r.
Northeastern University Golf Team


In Play:
Driver - Titleist 905R 9.5*/Aldila NV 75sFairway Wood - Titleist 904f 14.5*Dynamic Gold S300Hybrid - Cleveland Halo 2Iron(19*)Irons - Titleist 735cm(stainless)/Dynamic Gold S300 (Bent +0.5 degrees upright, +1.0 degrees strong) Wedges - Callaway...

  • Administrator
Posted
I am having the same dilemma as I said in a different thread. My problem is the offset of the new r7(425). It's hard for me to compare the drivers because I've never played a round with the new r7(425). I've only hit it on the range and on launch monitors. However, from what I've experienced, I think the new r7 is a little longer, but not by much, only about 5-10yards. The big difference was forgiveness. I found the new r7(425) to be much for forgiving on off-center hits. As for my choice, I dont know yet. Like I said the increase in offset of the new r7(425) compared to its original is a turnoff for me, but I'm interested in getting the newest technology possible. I think I'll end up waiting for the 905r.

There's no offset. It's a driver. I've seen it, used it, hit with it. There's no offset.

The R is a replacement for the T, so if you're a 905T kinda guy, cool. But if you play a 905S (or could), the R may not be for you.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
well after spending the weekend swing both the original r7 and the r7 425 i have decided to go with the r7 425 after i save up alittle more money. The 425 is just alot more consistent due to the better shaft and there is more room for forgiveness. so does anyone know where i can get one for the lowest price besides ebay. my retail stores are selling it for 399.99 and im hoping to get about 125.00 for my 580xd so im looking at about 275.00 in my retail stores. anyone know anywhere that would be lower than 399.99. thanks

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


  • Administrator
Posted
well after spending the weekend swing both the original r7 and the r7 425 i have decided to go with the r7 425 after i save up alittle more money. The 425 is just alot more consistent due to the better shaft and there is more room for forgiveness. so does anyone know where i can get one for the lowest price besides ebay. my retail stores are selling it for 399.99 and im hoping to get about 125.00 for my 580xd so im looking at about 275.00 in my retail stores. anyone know anywhere that would be lower than 399.99. thanks

Email the golf gods fellow that posts here - worst case, you can probably use a coupon to save some percentage.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
There's no offset. It's a driver. I've seen it, used it, hit with it. There's no offset.

Sorry, maybe I used the wrong terminology however, "While the r7 425cc Quad driver still features the ultimate in ball flight customization with four weight ports and four removable weight cartridges, the larger size also promotes exceptional forgiveness for longer, straighter shots — even on off-center hits.

A slightly closed clubface alignment is pleasing to the eyes, further increasing confidence and accuracy. " http://www.golfsmith.com/products/TM7425 The driver may not be offset, but when placed side by side with the r7(400cc) it appears to have a slightly closed face. That is all I was meaing to say. Personally I've never played either driver in the 905 series. I've hit the 905t on the range but I dont know whether I "could play" the 905s or not. Once the 905r comes into my local shop I'll demo it and see what I think. Thanks.
Northeastern University Golf Team


In Play:
Driver - Titleist 905R 9.5*/Aldila NV 75sFairway Wood - Titleist 904f 14.5*Dynamic Gold S300Hybrid - Cleveland Halo 2Iron(19*)Irons - Titleist 735cm(stainless)/Dynamic Gold S300 (Bent +0.5 degrees upright, +1.0 degrees strong) Wedges - Callaway...

Posted
Erik, who is the golf gods fellow and what is his email address?

In the Bag:

Driver: Taylormade r7 425 10.5
Woods: Taylormade Rescue Fairway #3
Irons: Taylormade Rac HT 3-PWWedges: Callaway Vintage Black 52 Top Flite 56 sandwedge Top Flite 60Putter: Taylormade Rosso Sport Marenello #2Ball: ...


Posted

I know Erik hates them, but I'd check eBay . You should get it for no more than 330 (brand new). I played both clubs - old and 425 and I'm not "sold". Neither really fit me. from the look / feel / distance point of view - neither matches the 510TP. Maybe it's the smaller head, maybe it's the hollow sound r7's make... Duno. I also had 580XD for a while, a very short while
IMHO - extra $200 is not worth it, but if you decide to go r7 and the MWT - get the old r7 TP - good shaft and plenty of weights to play with.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 7407 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The criticisms are starting already 🤣 U.S. Open pro criticizes Shinnecock green conditions: 'Bumpy' After playing his first practice round at the 2026 U.S. Open, Michael Kim offered a less-than-glowing review of Shinnecock's "bumpy" greens.   The sand, I don't care about that. If the greens didn't come back as well for latest aerification, that would be a bit of a blunder on Shinnecock I think.   
    • Well, if your frame of reference spins twice during the swing, then Bryson's ab/adduction is more like 780 degrees so there! (Yes I'm being silly, but not sure it's any sillier than what your pal Andy is doing...)
    • Update: Brandon Sorsby has decided to enter the NFL Supplemental Draft. He will not play for Texas Tech in the upcoming season.  From my perspective, I think he did the right thing. I hope he gets the correct help for his gambling addiction. I say the right thing, because I would be worried that the stress from all of this now and throughout the entire year would not be beneficial towards his mental health.  If an NFL team picks him up, then there really isn't any pressure for him to play immediately. He can work on himself and his game for the NFL.  From Texas Tech,  "Texas Tech will continue to provide the support and recovery resources Brendan requires on this journey. Furthermore, Texas Tech will not seek return of any amounts already paid to Brendan through his NIL agreements with the University," Campbell wrote. "We wish our best to Brendan, and we offer our prayers to him and his family as he chases his dreams at the next level. This has been an unbelievably painful experience for us all, but I know that his true, underlying character and lessons learned through this experience will ultimately bring him great success on the field of play and in life." Which, I also the right thing to do.   
    • So, something I noticed yesterday at the range. My eyes and visualization of what the ball needs to do is way off. I put up an alignment stick about 10 yards down range. My initial thought was, "Oh crap". Even while wearing prescription sunglasses, and I know I am hitting it towards the sun, I couldn't pick up where the ball was at all. 
    • Oh man. As you can see above, Manavian mocked me for not realizing they were getting the 130° from BOTH shoulders. Apparently, though, Manavian is also wrong, as Andy said I was lying when I cited what Manavian had written: The next thing Andy says that's both accurate and clearly stated will be the first. I replied to that post with something like: Tell Manavian who said "only counting the abduction/adduction of one shoulder rather than 2." One of the issues with “bad” information is that y’all can’t even get on the same page. You've not shown that Bryson has 130° range of motion in either shoulder separately P1 to P7. I’ve shown the numbers. You’ve name-called and just said “nuh uh” repeatedly. Did you see the AMG IG video? Of course you have. Wrapping your head around the distance the shoulder travels yet, Andy? Andy later commented to explain how he got his range of motion number (apologies to whoever @iacac and @icaca are on Instagram, who are going to be wondering just what in the hell they've gotten themselves into). Oh boy. Adding the numbers in one direction and then adding them again going back is not a "range" of motion. If I can bend my knees 140°, I don't claim to have 280° range of motion because I have two knees nor because I can also extend my knees 140° after bending them. Bryson (with a driver, again — I used his iron swing) abducts about 65° (and bends his elbow a ton) with the driver. Then he adducts 50… and then another 15°… to end up right back where he started. This is exactly the equivalent of saying that I bend my knees 140° and then straighten them, creating a range of 280°. It's so silly I don't even have much of a response. It falls down completely on its own. It doesn't need even a nudge.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.