Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6372 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I'm in the market for new irons, and I've narrowed it down to these two sets (X-20 and BB Irons), but I'm not sure which one is better suited for my game. Really, I'm looking on information as to when one should be in the market for game-improvement clubs vs. super game improvement clubs.

I've been playing for 5 years (started 10 years ago but took 5 years off). I've reduced my number of completely bad shots per game, but I have a pretty wicked slice. I usually hit right around 100. 95 on the good days and 105 on the bad. I am starting to golf more regularly (almost weekly), thus the desire for a "real" set of clubs.

I don't have any qualms about "funny looking" game improvement clubs, and I'm not out to impress anyone by having "pro looking" irons. In fact, I kind of like the new technology look, since my current clubs are over 10 years old. I was even looking at the cobra transition-s clubs for a while, but it seems like these Callaways get consistently better reviews (Golf Digest Hot List, etc).

SO...would one set of these clubs or the other be inherently better for my play level?

Posted
I'd say go with what you have hit best. The only one of those I have hit is the X-20's. While they were fairly damaging on bad hits, they felt amazing for me on the ones I hit well.

But that's just me. Like I said, go with what feels and what you hit best.

Driver: Big Bertha 460 11* w/ Graffaloy ProLaunch Blue 65R
Woods: Big Bertha 3 and 5 wood stock shaft, Light flex
Hybrids: None
Irons: Viper Tour 4-PW -1", 4* flat
Wedges: X-Tour 52.11*, 58.9*Putter: Classic 3 33"The Thing That Goes In The Hole (hopefully): NXT Tour"30 minutes a day keeps...


Posted
Don't go by what gets the better reviews. Base your decision on what you hit better and what feels the best for you.
That being said the Big Bertha's would be a better choice for your game unless all your strokes are lost on the tee or with your putter.

Posted
Thanks for the replies.

One problem I've had is telling much of a difference when I've hit them in stores. The shops I've been to just have me hitting into a net, and I'm not really sure what to look for there. I don't seem to get a good sense of which club I'm hitting better. That's why I was wondering if there was any general rules as to what level of golfer should be using each of the two sets.

Posted
i dont know if there is a Dicks Sporting Goods Golf Shop by you, but thats where i go when i want to try out new clubs to buy. they have a set up in the back where you hit a normal ball at a screen and it picks up how far the ball goes, where it lands on the course, where you hit it off of the face of the club, with all that it makes it easy to see what club set would be better. so good luck.

Posted
I've got the Callaway X-18's and I would have to say that they would be better suited for a 20 handicapper and the Big Bertha's for a 25-30 handicap. However, having said that, I believe that this depends solely on your strengths and weaknesses. Personally, I would go with the X-20's, there are several reasons for this with the main one being that as a 25 handicapper, you will likely improve as you start playing more and the Big Bertha's are going to get almost detramental to your game in a way as you won't be able to tell where you are hitting the ball on the clubface and you will have trouble with learning what you have to work on.

Taylormade R7 460
Lynx Parallax 15 Degree
Nickent 3DX Ironwood 18 degree
Callaway X-18's
Titleist Vokey Spin Milled 56 degreeOdyssey Black Series No. 1


Posted
Yeah, what golf rules said. Seriously, when I picked the game back up, I was using a set of Dunlop irons that were essentially Big Berthas; huge sole, huge cavity back, and large offset. It wasn't long before they became a problem. I couldn't tell any difference in feel from shot to shot. I wanted some reinforcement for good and bad shots. I say go with the X-20s, they will serve you better in the long run. I have the X-16 Pro series and absolutely love them(although I drool over the X-22s and X-forged every time I see them).

In my  Warbird Hot stand bag:
nike.gif Dymo2 Str8 fit 10.5 or  HiBore XLS 10.5,  Steelhead Plus 3 and 5 woods,

 NP2 3H,  DCI 990 4-PW,  Forged + 54/12,  RAC 58/8,

 Classic #1,  NXT Tour or  Burner TP
 


Note: This thread is 6372 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • So you understand this format is intended to get as many people involved as possible, but you prefer a format where the only scores that are likely to count are those of the better players.  How often do you think the score of the D player would count?  And knowing his score won't count, why would be "be bothered" to play?   I'm not a fan of scrambles, but I understand the reason to use the format.  I DO enjoy meeting club members, and I believe that my club's spring scramgle is relatively free of cheating, although there definitely ARE some players who overdo the libations.  If your club's scramble is rife with cheating, that's a problem with the culture of your club, not a problem with scrambles in general.  
    • I know that every golf outing is always a scramble because of the varied skill levels, but my buddy thinks I'm a snob because I don't like to play our club's kickoff event, which is an A-B-C-D scramble.  Yeah, I get the point of it to mix teams up and get to know other/new members, but I honestly can't be bothered.  Would much rather that they play it as a SWAT format - still A-B-C-D players, but you only count the lowest gross score (no gimmes).   I just don't get the point of scrambles beyond people who love to booze it up and they are always rife with cheating. 
    • Wordle 1,769 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 ⬜🟨⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Nice! Wordle 1,769 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟩🟨⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,769 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟩⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟨⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.