Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
So I'm looking at adding a Vokey to the bag but which one. I'm somewhat limited by what www.tgw.com have as (according to a thread I found here) they allow my parents back home (UK) to get it for me (Xmas gift) and pay for it, then get it delivered to my US address, saving me hauling it back on the plane.

http://www.tgw.com/customer/search2....itmfr=Titleist

Besides loft (I'm going for a 60*) and bounce (which doesn't seem to make s huge difference) is it just a difference in the finish?

I rather like the oil cans from an aesthetic perspective but am not sure whether they require a lot of TLC. I've got some gun oil I use after each round to prevent rust on my Scotty Cameron and that's fine with me...

Any input would be great

Cheers.

In the Matrix XTT Standbag:

Driver: Biggest Big Bertha 11*
Fairway Wood: Steelhead Plus 3 Wood
Irons: T-Zoid Titanium Insert irons 3-SWWedge: Vokey Spin Milled Oil Can 60.04Putter: Pro Platinum Laguna 34" w/ British Open '04 headcoverBall: ProV1 Rule35 Playing again after a three year hiatus...


Posted
Well playability-wise bounce does make a big difference. If you are a 'sweeper' or 'picker' of the ball and dont take big divots, then you'll want to go with the 60.04 with 4 degrees of bounce. This is what I use and despite its low bounce it works well out of bunkers for me. If you are more of a digger you'll want something with more bounce. The vokey website should do a good job explaining all of the options. As far as finish goes, I'm not sure about how much love you have to give the oil can but i do know that its designed to wear over time naturally. If you prefer to have your clubs looking as new as they can for as long as they can, you may want to go with the tour chrome or black nickel.

My Bag:
905T 9.5 Grafalloy Blue S
980F 15, 19 Speeder by Titleist S
990 4-PW DGS300
Vokey 54.10 60.04 TC SC PP Newport 2 34"


Posted
Well playability-wise bounce does make a big difference. If you are a 'sweeper' or 'picker' of the ball and dont take big divots, then you'll want to go with the 60.04 with 4 degrees of bounce. This is what I use and despite its low bounce it works well out of bunkers for me. If you are more of a digger you'll want something with more bounce. The vokey website should do a good job explaining all of the options. As far as finish goes, I'm not sure about how much love you have to give the oil can but i do know that its designed to wear over time naturally. If you prefer to have your clubs looking as new as they can for as long as they can, you may want to go with the tour chrome or black nickel.

Spot on advice.

But for some reason the 60.04 from the old Vokey line plays a little better out of the rough than one might expect. I'm definately a digger, but this club still works for me. I think it has to do with the sole depth which actually increases the "effective" bounce. So although the bounce is very important in a wedge, in this particular wedge (Vokey SM60) I don't think you will see a great deal of difference. Be prepared to carry the ball all the way to the hole! This wedge bites when new.

Posted
My Vokey wedge has the "oil can" finish and I haven't done anything special to protect it's finish besides keeping it clean and dry. I wipe it down like I do all my clubs with my bag towel and so far besides the finish itself wearing away on the sole and face of the club it looks like it did when I bought it a couple of months ago.

I wish now though that I had bought the chrome finish instead of the oil can. Titleist says that the oil can finish groves actually wear down faster than the chromed ones because there is no protective finish/covering over the raw steel (stainless is very soft as far as metals go). While I'm not overly worried about groove wear on the club it is easy to see that the club face itself takes more of a beating from regular play versus a club with a chrome finish.

As to bounce I got my LW with the low bounce option because my SW has a lot of bounce. so what I do is if the shot calls for a lot of bounce (soft sand, thick grass, etc.) I use my SW but if low bounce is called for (hard, packed, or wet sand, tight lie, etc.) I go with the LW. For me having my two highest lofted wedges with opposit bounces adds more options in my bag.

Nike Vapor Speed driver 12* stock regular shaft
Nike Machspeed 4W 17*, 7W 21* stock stiff shafts
Ping i10 irons 4-9, PW, UW, SW, LW AWT stiff flex
Titleist SC Kombi 35"; Srixon Z Star XV tour yellow

Clicgear 3.0; Sun Mountain Four 5


Posted
well, in my experience, the low bounce is only really better if you are hitting off of hard pan. the high bounce works well for most people despite what kind of swing you have. i am a digger, and i play high bounce, but my brother is a sweeper, and he also plays high bounce. i would go to the store, and see which ever one feels most comfortable for you

In my vaporlite carry bag
DRIVER ft-5. 9* Mitsubishi Diamana BlueBoard 73 X-stiff
FWY WOOD: 980F 15 EI-70 X Stiff
Hybrid: Burner tour launch 4 hybrid
IRONS mp-57 4-pw with project x 6.5 shaftsPUTTER: Rossa Classic AGSI+ Monte Carlo WEDGES vokey spin milled oil can 52.08, 58.12Niblick 42*


Posted
As to bounce I got my LW with the low bounce option because my SW has a lot of bounce. so what I do is if the shot calls for a lot of bounce (soft sand, thick grass, etc.) I use my SW but if low bounce is called for (hard, packed, or wet sand, tight lie, etc.) I go with the LW. For me having my two highest lofted wedges with opposit bounces adds more options in my bag.

Actually, I did the very same thing for the very same reasons.


Posted

60 degree with low bounce.
As for the finish, I like the black on my Tmade wedges.
I hang my 60 and 56 SW in the same section of my bag.
They seem to get along fine. They are my scoring clubs!
Amazing how the finish makes them seem softer, with more touch.
My chrome 50 gap wedge I have to keep separate.
Looks like a plan old iron. Jealous I think!

Driver :T Edge CB-1 or Cally Mini Driver 14* or GBB 11*
Tour Edge CB2 15* 3 wood (Best Club Ever!)

Callaway XR 5Wood (New BCE!)

Hybrids: Nike SQ 23*  Tour Edge 28*

Irons: TMade RAC  7-PW   T Flight 56 SWedge
Putter: Odyssey 2 Ball Blade, SStroke flatside to hole


Posted
speaking of the vokey wedges, does anyone know when the new models are going to be available? tgw and golfsmith were showing that they would be shipping this week, now the scheduled shipped date has been pushed back to december/january.

apex53
In my bag:
Titleist 913D3 9.5
Titleist 913F 15

Titleist 913H 19, 913H21

Titleist 712CB 5-P Titleist Vokey 54, 58 Scotty Cameron Fastback Titleist ProV1x


Note: This thread is 6404 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.