Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6137 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. which is better

    • Nike CCI
      5
    • Titleist AP1
      27
    • About the same
      6


Recommended Posts

Posted
I have been looking at titleist ap1 Irons when I some nike cci's. I find it hard to go against titleist irons but I was wondering if you guys think these Irons are on par with the titleist Irons.


please state why one is better or are they just better in different aspects like feel forgiveness and workability.

Posted
I have been looking at titleist ap1 Irons when I some nike cci's. I find it hard to go against titleist irons but I was wondering if you guys think these Irons are on par with the titleist Irons.

Workability with either of those anchors? lol. I'd go with the AP2's....they arent that much harder to hit, and provide better feel/feedback.

G15 9.0 Degree, PRO FORCE V2 77G-X
MP57- 3-5, MP68- 6-P (X100's)
56 (QUAD CUT/ X100)
Odyssey Sabretooth
B330 Black Tour


Posted
I feel like a lot of people here are extremely titleist biased. It's a great golf company, but I find their stuff to expensive and sometimes a little too hype endorsed.

Haven't heard great things about those cci's. Mizuno makes an mp-52 iron that's a lot like the ap1's and ap2's. I like taylormade the most so you could take a look at their tp irons or their r7 tp's which are cavitybacks but very workable as well as cast for durability. Cleveland cg reds are also in that range of workable forgiveness while being cast.

If you're getting cast clubs for durability go right ahead, but if you're getting them because they seem cheaper, go for some forged sticks. I highly recommend looking at mizuno's if you decide to go that way due to the price deals on ebay.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Workability with either of those anchors? lol. I'd go with the AP2's....they arent that much harder to hit, and provide better feel/feedback.

I didnt think I would be advanced enough to use the AP2s but I will look at them thanks.


Posted
  imtomtomim said:
I feel like a lot of people here are extremely titleist biased. It's a great golf company, but I find their stuff to expensive and sometimes a little too hype endorsed.

I admit I am titleist biased but not so much to miss a good deal (i wont get screwed over buying a Scotty Cameron). I love the feel they give and I dont know why but useing titles clubs and balls just give me a feeling of confidence and golf being largely a mental game i will take every little bit of help. I will look in to those clubs seriously. Thanks!


Posted
I ordered the AP2's two days ago... when I get them and have a chance to try them, I'll get back to you. Hitting them in the net at Golfsmith there was no contest... nothing else I tried even came close.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I would always err on the side of more forgiveness. There is no reason not to get yourself a more forgiving iron design unless you are a +5 handicap. Otherwise you are only hurting yourself and your wallet in the long run. Take some time and look at the tour pro's bags and you will see many more cavity backs than blades.

Whats in the bag?
Driver = Wishon Golf 949mc 9.75*/.5* Closed Face Angle
Fairway Wood = Wishon Golf 915 F/H 16* Square Face Angle
Wood Shafts = Wishon Golf Pro Flight EXP 85g Stiff Flex
Hybrids = Wishon Golf 331H 21* & 24*Hybrid Shafts = Wishon Golf GI335 Tour Weight 92g Stiff FlexIrons = Wishon...


Posted
I need some help. I am a somewhat beginning golfer and i ordered the Nike Slingshot OSS irons which i recieved today. Has anyone seen these in person? what i was wondering is that on the 8,9,pw,aw the black piece on the back of the club head is full. on the 4,5,6,7 the black piece on top of the saddle on the back is not there, therefore the cavity is somewhat open. Is this the way they are suppose to be?
Posted
Yes I know a couple of people that play these and yes that's how there made

Mizuno mp 630 9.5 Mitsubishi Fubuki stiff
Taylormade R7 RE*AX 55g Stiff
Taylomade Rescue mid 19* Light metals 95g
Mizuno MX25 4 -52*Gap True Temper Dynalite S/L
Mizuno MP-T 56* / 60*Odyssey White Hot Tour # 1


Posted
  imtomtomim said:
I feel like a lot of people here are extremely titleist biased. It's a great golf company, but I find their stuff to expensive and sometimes a little too hype endorsed.

I second the mizuno's they make a great club have a few sets in the GI catagory you may like and ther forged.

Mizuno mp 630 9.5 Mitsubishi Fubuki stiff
Taylormade R7 RE*AX 55g Stiff
Taylomade Rescue mid 19* Light metals 95g
Mizuno MX25 4 -52*Gap True Temper Dynalite S/L
Mizuno MP-T 56* / 60*Odyssey White Hot Tour # 1


Posted
Thank you so much!! Now i feel better about my purchase. They hit great for me but will be somewhat hard to clean. LOL
Posted
No problem enjoy your new purchase I know my friends like them.

Mizuno mp 630 9.5 Mitsubishi Fubuki stiff
Taylormade R7 RE*AX 55g Stiff
Taylomade Rescue mid 19* Light metals 95g
Mizuno MX25 4 -52*Gap True Temper Dynalite S/L
Mizuno MP-T 56* / 60*Odyssey White Hot Tour # 1


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
Im very curious to know what people think about the victory red blades versus the Titleist ZM blades.

In my Stand Bag:
Driver: 910 D2 9.5*- Stiff Ahina
3W: Snake Eyes

7W: Snake Eyes (IDK why i love this club)
Irons: 690.MB 3i-PW Stiff
Wedges: CG12 54*, Form Forged 900 60*

Putter: Versa White #1

Ball: Pro V1x *used and cheap/free*


Posted
jcrob902- Do you really feel that the 52's are game improvement irons? I have heard they are somewhere between players irons and Game improvements, but isnt that for people with a 10 or lower handicap?

Superquad 10.5* Aldila Shaft (the green one)
R9 3-Wood 15* Stiff
Ignite 3H
MP-52 PW-4
Vokey Tour Wedge 52,56,60 Newport Studio 2


Posted
  201-pb said:
jcrob902- Do you really feel that the 52's are game improvement irons? I have heard they are somewhere between players irons and Game improvements, but isnt that for people with a 10 or lower handicap?

If you'r refering to the quote above no I don't think mp 57's or the 52's are GI irons I was just agreeing that as a former Titleist player I now prefer the Mizuno irons there a better iron and have more to choose from in my handicap catagory,I would probably compare the MP 52's & 57's to the AP2'S but no where close to the AP1's sorry for the confusion.

Mizuno mp 630 9.5 Mitsubishi Fubuki stiff
Taylormade R7 RE*AX 55g Stiff
Taylomade Rescue mid 19* Light metals 95g
Mizuno MX25 4 -52*Gap True Temper Dynalite S/L
Mizuno MP-T 56* / 60*Odyssey White Hot Tour # 1


Posted
  Fourputt said:
I ordered the AP2's two days ago... when I get them and have a chance to try them, I'll get back to you. Hitting them in the net at Golfsmith there was no contest... nothing else I tried even came close.

Congrats. Got mine last summer and haven't had one complaint about them. The only real issue I've had is not getting as much spin out of the rough like I did with my old square groove irons. No problems spinning the ball from the fairway though. Sweet feeling clubs.

In my BagBoy Clip-Lok bag:

Driver: Titleist 909 D2
3 Wood: Callaway X tour (alternates with 2H hybrid depending on the course)
Hybrid: Titleist 909H 21 degreeIrons: Titleist AP2 4-PW, PX 5.5 flighted shaftWedges: Titleist Spin Milled 52 degree, Taylor Made Rac Black TP 56 and 60 deg.Putter:...


Posted
  mjgraniero said:
Congrats. Got mine last summer and haven't had one complaint about them. The only real issue I've had is not getting as much spin out of the rough like I did with my old square groove irons. No problems spinning the ball from the fairway though. Sweet feeling clubs.

I would agree, the Ap2 irons improved my play. I don't plan on changing irons for a long time,

In my bag:

Driver: 905R Proforce V2 S76 10.5*
3Wood: 906F4 Aldila vs proto S80 15.5*
Hybrids: 585H Project X 6.0 21*Irons: AP2 4-PW Project X 6.0 4-6 bent 2* weak 7-PW bent 1* weakWedge: SW SM53* bent from 56* (custom grind by me) DG S200 Wedge: LW SM58* bent from 60* (custom...


Note: This thread is 6137 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I played in an outing a few years ago. The course was wet, and it was windy. We all did bad enough to reward us with a PCC of +1 (If I am remembering this correctly). So all of our differentials went up 1.  So, if that score is part of my best 8 out of 20. That means I am getting 1/8th of a differential improvement. For you to get a PCC, you need enough people submitting their score for handicap during that day. Let's say you were the only person who was submitting the score for handicap, odds are you are not getting a PCC.  Which is fine, because no handicap system can be that nuanced. I don't think you'd want it to be. Still, my statement is correct. It takes into account weather and abnormal difficult conditions. 
    • I’ve been rather surprised how my original question relating to the logic behind “differential vs course handicap” elicited the responses expressed on this thread so far. I suppose it shows that there are many who have given this subject a lot of thought. I personally like the current system for the same reasons stated in the post by saevel25 and it works very well in our league. I just needed to get the reasoning/logic clear in my head so I could explain it succinctly to those who had questions. Regarding the ongoing discussion, the only tweak we make is only the scores made in league competition count. (We don’t use GHIN, we do the calculation ourselves.) The only additional thought I had is perhaps the powers that be can come up with a method, when doing the differential calculation, of giving greater weight to the rounds played more recently than those from 20 rounds ago. I’ve been testing this with an idea I had similar to the way colleges calculate GPA’s based on credits offered by different classes, but honestly, the complexity it adds to the calculation isn’t worth the trouble as any change made has proven to be inconsequential.
    • Wordle 1,616 4/6 ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 102 11-21 Early practice session today. Flow drill, getting to lead side, and a bit of skills work. Really need to slow down and ingrain the "rotating" to lead side.  Feels weird-which is great, it means changes, I'm just going too fast right now. 
    • Wordle 1,616 4/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.